You
will notice that Wahabism is
spread in Arab world like wild
fire (except for Yemen and few more countries which were
praised by Prophet Peace be upon him) and also many times people get
impressed by their recitation of Qur'an in prolific Arabic
language.
The next important point is about sticking
to Jamm'ah which is
understood from other hadiths that it refers to Ahlus
Sunnah wal Jamm'ah which is Sawad
ul Adham
(highest ranking scholars and
their majority fellowship who hold onto 4 schools of jurisprudence,
Ash'ari/Maturidi in creed and also followers of Tassawuf)
This
following hadith proves that even if we do not find genuine Sunni
scholars and leader of Muslim Ummah, then Porphet did not say wage
Baatil Jihad on Muslim nations like Wahabis perceive,
rather he told us to isolate ourselves even if we have to eat the
roots of trees until death comes up upon us.
This
hadith also destroys the Wahabi
Baatil Jihad completely
Book
020, Number 4555: (Sahih Muslim)
It
has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger
of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: One who defected from
obedience (to the Amir) and separated from the main body of the
Muslims-if he died in that state-would die the death of one belonging
to the days of Jahiliyya (i. e. would not die as a Muslim). One who
fights under the banner of a people who ate blind (to the cause for
which they are fighting. i. e. do not know whether their cause is
just or otherwise), who gets flared up with family pride, calls,
(people) to fight for their. family honour, and supports his
kith and kin (i. e. fignts not for the cause of Allah but for the
sake of this family or tribe) -if he is killed (in this fight), he
dies as one belonging to the days of Jhiliyya. Whoso attacks my Umma
(indiscriminately) killing the righteous and the wicked of them,
sparing not (even) those staunch in faith and fulfilling not his
promise made with those who have been given a pledge of security-he
has nothing to do with me and I have nothing to do with him.
Note: I
have read this hadith many times in my life and By Allah this refutes
the extremist Wahabis word by
word. Especially the last passasge starting from: "Whoso
attacks my Umma (indiscriminately) killing the righteous and the
wicked of them..." is very revealing.
Book
020, Number 4565: (Sahih Muslim)
It has been narrated on
the authority of 'Arfaja who said: I have heard the Messenger of
Allah (may peace be upon him) say: Different evils will make their
appearance in the near future. Anyone who tries to disrupt the
affairs of this Umma while they are united you should strike him with
the sword whoever he be. (If remonstrance does not prevail with him
and he does not desist from his disruptive activities, he is to be
killed.)
Volume 9, Book 83, Number 2: (Sahih
Bukhari)
Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said, "A
faithful believer remains at liberty regarding his religion unless he
kills somebody unlawfully."
Note: The Prophet (Peace be
upon him) made a beautiful point and he mentions "Killing
SOMEBODY unlawfully" rather than only saying "Killing
MUSLIM unlawfully"
This includes all kinds of people
whether Sunni, Shia, Christians and even polytheists. Islam teaches
proper guidelines not indiscriminate killing of even animals let
alone polytheists. Hence how could Wahabis with their so called
Jihaad against Ahlus Sunnah or Shias and their mass murdering be
justified? This Baatil ideology of Wahabis is exposed like a bright
sun even by this short hadith.
Volume 9, Book 83, Number
7: (Sahih Bukhari)
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar: The
Prophet said, "After me (i.e. after my death), do not become
disbelievers, by striking (cutting) the necks of one another.
Note:
This hadith does not apply on Sahaba but Khawarij who always incited
Sahaba and Ahlul Bayt to fight with one another. The Wahabis are
following the legacy of Khawarij too and inciting Muslims to fight
with one another rather than we putting full concentration to make
high standard weaponry to confront Zionists.
This hadith
also proves that stricking heads of other Muslims (i.e. Killing them)
makes one a disbeliever.
Not to rebel against even worst
of Rulers
Book 20, Number 4573: (Sahih Muslim)
It
has been narrated on the authority of 'Auf b. Malik that the
Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The best of your
rulers are those whom you love and who love you, who invoke God's
blessings upon you and you invoke His blessings upon them. And the
worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and who hate you and
whom you curse and who curse you. It was asked (by those present):
Shouldn't we overthrow them with the help of the sword? He said: No,
as long as they establish prayer among you. If you then find anything
detestable in them. You should hate their administration, but do not
withdraw yourselves from their obedience.
Even though
description of worst rulers apply on Wahabi Saudi Kingdom today but
still the Prophet (Peace be upon him) forbade us to use sword against
tyrant rulers. On the other hand wahabism was founded on brutality
when they attacked the last Muslim Ottomon Sultanate and they spilled
the blood of thousands of Muslims even those who were worshipping in
Haramayn. Wahabis even today do this and declare Ahlus Sunnah as
disbelievers and thus Jihad upon us and governments is necessary
(Naudhobillah).
Sahih Muslim Chapter title:
باب
الَْمْرِ بِلُزُومِ الْجَمَاعَةِ عِنْدَ
ظُهُورِ الْفِتَنِ وَتَحْذِ رٌِ الدُّعَاةِ
إِلَى الْكُفْرِ
The
obligation of staying with the Jama'ah (main body) of the muslims
when Fitan (tribulations) appear, and in all circumstances. The
prohibition of refusing to obey and on splitting away from the
Jama'ah
Book 20, Hadith 4554: (Sahih Muslim)
It
his been narrated through a different chain of transmitters, on the
authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said:
Messenger of
Allah, no doubt, we had an evil time (i. e. the days of Jahiliyya or
ignorance) and God brought us a good time (i. e. Islamic period)
through which we are now living Will there be a bad time after this
good time? He (the Holy Prophet) said: Yes. I said: Will there be a
good time after this bad time? He said: Yes. I said: Will there be a
bad time after good time? He said: Yes. I said: How? Whereupon he
said: There will be leaders who will not be led by my guidance and
who will not adopt my ways?
There will be among them men
who will have the hearts of devils in the bodies of human beings
( رِجَال
قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّ اٌَطِ نٌِ فِ
جُثْمَانِ إِنْ ).
I said: What should I do. Messenger of Allah, if I (happen) to live
in that time? He replied: You will listen to the Amir and carry out
his orders; even if your back is flogged and your wealth is snatched,
you should listen and obey.
Again this refutes the Wahabi
ideology completely, please note at the Hadith as it says to the
extent that: "THEY WILL HAVE HEARTS OF DEVILS IN BODIES OF HUMAN
BEINGS" Now no matter the ruler is Shia or even Kafir as long as
the rulers do not stop the Muslims from establishing prayers in
mosques they cannot be fought against. This has marvelous wisdom
because once you start the fight in Muslim countries then only the
Yuhud, Nassara and polytheists benefit from it. I have personally
heard Christians and Americans laughing over the Muslim countries and
mocking at Islam (Naudhobillah) that look they are killing
themselves. The Zionists only want to eliminate Muslims and they do
not care whether you are Sunni or Shia.
Wahabis are thus
biggest allies of Zionists, their leaders who incite young wahabis
for Baatil Jihad are many times taking funding from Zionists but the
ordinary wahabis in lower hierarchical chain assume as if they are
fighting against Yuhud and Nassara ( but they do not realize that
they in reality are fighting "FOR" them)
An
exquisite Hadith
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 428: Narrated
'Uqba bin 'Amir: One day the Prophet went out and offered the funeral
prayers of the martyrs of Uhud and then went up the pulpit and said,
"I will pave the way for you as your predecessor and will be a
witness on you. By Allah! I see my Fount (Kauthar) just now and I
have been given the keys of all the treasures of the earth (or the
keys of the earth) By Allah! I am not afraid that you will worship
others along with Allah after my death, but I am afraid that you will
fight with one another for the worldly things
This hadith
destroys Wahabism from variety of Angles.
a) It proves
immense knowledge of unseen being given to Prophet (Peace be upon
him) to the extent that he saw fount Kawther right from earth. This
proves he can see from near and far. Many hadiths above also prove
that Prophet (Peace be upon him) knew of future events. The Wahabis
deny Ilm ul Ghayb of Prophet in "Mutlaqqan (total)" terms
when they are with their own Shayateen (I have experienced this
myself) but when they are refuted they hypocritically say "Ahh
he had some" so in a nutshell Wahabis are confused about Nubuwah
and are insulters of Prophet.
b) The Prophet (Peace and
Blessings be upon him) took an oath that we will not worship other
than Allah after him. Whereas Wahabis say majority of Muslims as
Mushrikeen, the wahabis say exactly opposite to Prophetic
understanding of Tawheed (as proven from many hadiths as shown before
and shall be shown again in this article)
c) Prophet
(Peace be upon him) was afraid that we will fight with one another
"FOR WORLDLY THINGS" . This again destroys Wahabi ideology
because when Wahabis declare Muslims as Mushrikeen then fighting is
bound to happen as Muslims consider Ilzaam of Shirk to be far worst
than cussing at our mothers or fathers. Please remember that Wahabis
misquote Fath ul Bari cleverly by not stressing on the point that Ibn
Hajr himself said that "SOME WILL FALL IN SHIRK" which by
itself proves Wahabi ideology to be wrong.
They often
reject sayings of same Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah) in a very
insulting way to the extent of saying that Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani
(rah) was "CONFUSED IN REGARDS TO SIFAAT OF ALLAH" and he
gave "ASH'ARI" like interpretations, but when it comes to
justifying their own viewpoints they rely on Qawl of same scholar
that too by misinterpreting it.
Here is what Ibn Hajr (rah) said
according to famous islamqa Wahabi website: Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar
al-„Asqallaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The words “I
do not fear that you will associate others with Allah” mean: (I do
not fear that you will do that) en masse, because that happened with
some of them – may Allah protect us. This hadeeth is one of the
miracles of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him),
hence the author narrated it under the heading of the signs of
Prophethood. End quote from Fath al-Baari, 3/211
Please
note at red highlighted part which destroys Wahabi ideology itself.
The Islamqa website uses the word en masse which could be a difficult
word to understand for people
who do not know English well. They
should have kept that word simple and easy to understand just like
they kept the remaining passage simple.
En masse = In
totality.
Then it says "BECAUSE THAT HAPPENED WITH
SOME OF THEM"
Hence majority of Muslims i.e. Ahlus
Sunnah wal Jamm'ah (those who do Taqleed, those who are
Ash'ari/Maturidi, those who follow Tassawuf) are not indulged in
shirk by any means. It is just false understanding of Tawhid and
Shirk by Wahabis which forces them to hurl Baatil fatwas upon us and
I take an oath that their Baatil takfeer bounces back on their own
minority barbaric sect as it was proven above through many hadiths ,
one of which proves from Prophet (Peace be upon him) that "ONE
WHO ACCUSES IS MORE DESERVING TO BE MUSHRIK THAN THE ONE
ACCUSED"
Hence this hadith has to be taken in general. If
we start believing that it only applies to Sahaba as Wahabis misquote
scholars then Naudhobillah it has to be accepted that "SAHABA
FOUGHT OVER WORLDLY THINGS WITH ONE ANOTHER"
Plus to
make it specific one has to cite a categorical Nass from Prophet
(Peace be upon him) in regards to "SAME ABOVE HADITH" where
he clarified that "HE ONLY TALKED ABOUT SAHABA TENURE" not
even explanation of Ibn Hajr can work according to Usool ul Hadith
(Wahabis are ignorant of Usool ul Hadith as they are just fake Ahlul
Hadith)
To expand a little more we would like to show some
more hadiths which establish that Shirk al-Akbar will not enter this
Ummah "IN MAJORITY" the wahabis accuse the majority of
being indulged in Shirk al-Akbar so none of their interpretation or
counter refutation is to be given any weight.
First Hadith
in explanation of this is found under chapter title of Sahi Muslim
which states:
بَاب
تَحْرِ شٌِ الشَّ طٌَْانِ وَبَعْثِهِ
سَرَا اٌَهُ لِفِتْنَةِ النَّاسِ وَأَنَّ
مَعَ كُلِّ إِنْسَانٍ قَرِ لٌاً نا
Chapter:
The Mischief Of The Shaitan And How He Sends His Troops To Tempt
People, And With Every Person There Is A Qarin (Companion From Among
The Jinn) The Hadith states:
Book 39, Hadith 6752: (Sahh
Muslim)
Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (صلى
الله عليه وسلم)
as saying: Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers
would ever worship (him) in the peninsula of Arabia, but he (is
hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst
them.
Satan had sown exactly that into Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahab who contrary to this hadith believed that Arabian peninsula was
engulfed in Shirk al Akbar (Naudhobillah) and thus he started
dissension amongst Muslims (i.e. Arabs first and then this fitnah
spread everywhere through Saudi funding)
Allah's Merciful
Prophet is saying that Satan has lost all hope that Muslims will
worship him (i.e. commit shirk) but Wahabis say: Wait a minute let us
become helpers of Satan to make Muslims fight by calling them
Mushrikeen.
We Ahlus Sunnah slap Satan Khabeeth by
exposing him and his ilk (Wahabiyoon)
Let us look at another
Sareeh hadith:
Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has
informed us: “The thing that I fear most for my Ummah is
associating others with Allah. I do not say that they will worship
the sun or the moon or idols, but deeds done for the sake of anyone
other than Allah, and hidden desires.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1 B37,
H4205]
Note: This hadith and the next hadith which we will
show from Mustadrak al-Hakim are both weak in "SPECIFIC CHAINS"
however they become authentic due to many Shawahid and hadiths from
Bukhari, Muslim and others which were shown above.
Let us
look at yet another hadith (not quoting scholars yet)
It
is recorded in Al Mustadrak Ala Sahihayn (4/366):
Shadad
bin Aws (RA) narrates that he was crying one day. Thereupon, someone
asked him why he was crying? He replied: It is because of something I
heard the Prophet (Peace and Blessings be upon him) saying; it's
memory is making me cry. He says that he heard the Prophet (Peace be
upon him) saying: ―I fear upon my ummah the "SMALLER"
from of Shirk (polytheism) and desire. Shaddad (RA) asked the Prophet
(Peace be upon him): Would you Ummah associate partners with Allah
after you? The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Yes, (but) "THEY
WILL NOT WORSHIP THE SUN OR THE MOON OR STONES OR IDOLS, BUT THEY
WILL DO ACTIONS TO PLEASE OTHERS"
[al-Hakim in Mustadrak
ala Sahihayn, Volume # 4, Page # 366]
Imam al-Hakim (rah)
said after this hadith:
This hadith has "SAHIH CHAIN"
but is not narrated (by Bukhari and Muslim)
Wahabis in
opposition to such ahadith, say that Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon
him)'s tomb is the biggest idol (Naudhobillah). Actually these
Wahabis have claimed their own new Nubuwah where they claim to know
more than Prophet (Peace be upon him). This is not to be taken
lightly as I am serious because such opposition to Prophetic
teachings can only be done by people who claim their intellect to be
superior to that of Prophet (Peace be upon him).. Naudhobillah.
This
hadith from Mustadrak could be called weak or even rejected due to
presence of "Abdul Wahid bin Zaid" in chain. The point
arises why Imam al-Hakim (rah) called it Sahih?
Although
Imam al-Hakim (rah) is considered soft in authenticating hadiths but
this judgement against him is not true in Mutlaqan terms. Imam
al-Hakim (rah) was amongst the top notch Muhaditheen, rather he was
amongst those great scholars who compiled the Usool of Hadith
initially for Ummah which benifit us till today.
The
reason why Imam al-Hakim (rah) authenticated the chain is because
Muhaditheen do not work like Wahabis work i.e. If you stumble upon 1
weak chain then you start calling the "MATN" of hadith as
weak. This is never a proper way to judge "MATN" of
any
hadith. It is a fact that many times Muhaditheen were keeping in mind
different turaq (chains) and Shawahid present on same hadith in their
minds and thus declare it Sahih or Hasan. Even aqwaal of some
Muhaditheen on some narrators will not work because when the "MATN"
is proven authentic then hadith becomes authentic. This is why Ahlus
Sunnah prove the Matn of hadith which states: "Sahaba are like
Stars" to be authentic although none of it's chain is authentic
(Rawafidh also reject that hadith by saying look none of the chains
are authentic)
I would like to quote Ibn Taymiyyah the so
called Shaykh ul Islam over here:
It is not allowed for
the claiment to confine himself to (all) hadiths of Prophet (Peace be
upon him) which are in "CERTAIN COLLECTIONS" If we should
believe that all Ahadith from the Prophet were confined (to certain
books only) then no scholar has knowledge of all that is in books nor
is it possible for anyone to know (them all). Rather at times a
person may have many books with himself but he does not know
everything which they contain. Instead those who came before the
compilation of Books were much more knowledgeable than those who came
later (Ibn Taymiyyah praises likes of Imam Abu Hanifa here), this is
because "MANY HADITHS WERE AUTHENTIC IN THEIR RESPECTIVE TIMES
BUT THEY REACHED US THROUGH AN UNKNOWN NARRATOR OR A DISCONTINUED
CHAIN, OR IT DID NOT REACH US AT ALL" Their books were
(preserved) in their hearts which contained more than what we have
with us now (i.e. present books). "THIS IS
SOMETHING ON
WHICH THERE IS NO DOUBT AND (ANYONE) HAVING SOME KNOWLEDGE
UNDERSTANDS IT" [Majmua al Fatawa (20/239)]
Although
Ahlus Sunnah strongly refutes Ibn Taymiyyah but here he has talked
like a Sufi. The people of Tassawuf strongly believe that knowledge
does come from "heart to heart" and this is indeed the
traditional and appropriate way taught by Prophet (Peace be upon
him).
The Wahabis even after seeing beautiful explanation of Ibn
Taymiyyah might assume that I do not have "AUTHENTIC"
Shawahid from "present day books of hadith" and thus Ummah
will indeed get into Shirk al Akbar (in majority i.e.)
Naudhobillah.
To their surprise, here is witness # 1
The
previous hadith in Ibn Majah states:
صلى
الله عليه وسلم came
out to us when we were discussing Dajjal (False Christ) and
said:
Shall I not tell you of that which I fear more for you
than Dajjal? ‘ We said: Yes.‟ He said: Hidden polytheism, when a
man stands to pray and makes it look good because he sees a man
looking at him." [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1 B37, H4204]
This
hadith is declared "HASSAN" by so called leading Muhadith
of Wahabis Zubayr Zai [Darussalam English Version of Ibn Majah,
Hadith # 4204]
The Prophet (Peace be upon him) feared
"SHIRK AL-KHAFI (HIDDEN/MINOR SHIRK)" more than he feared
Dajjal and this is a proof that Prophet (Peace be upon him) did not
fear of Shirk al-Jalli (Shirk al Akbar) to become prevelant in
Majority of Ummah.
Hence we agree that Ummah even in majority
can get indulged in "Riya (showing off) which is minor shirk"
but cannot indulge in Shirk al Akbar (Major shirk) "IN MAJORITY"
no matter how fancy interpretations Wahabis give.
Note:
Yes "SOME" people will get into Shirk al Akbar too like for
example believing in a sky god with "LEGS/SHINS", god who
has a shadow, god who sits on the throne and sound of quaking is
heard, god who has a "HADD (LIMIT)" which he himself knows,
god who can be pointed with a direction, this world being
beginingless and always existed (like Ibn Taymiyyah believed contrary
to belief that only Allah exists from Azl), god who laughs literally,
god who runs/jogs, god who capable of doing wrong deeds (These
beliefs are and were upheld by Wahabi leading authorities)
Also
the apostates like Nusayriyah (who are not part of Muslims) and some
Indian actors and cricket players who are Muslims just by name, they
do strange things on hindu temples due to pressure from hindus. These
people were never Muslims at first place, the actor Shahrukh married
a hindu woman and his house contains hindu idols along with Qur'an
(Naudhobillah).
Also we Ahlus Sunnah are honest people and
we are against some wrong acts taking place on some graves of Awliya,
however we have clarified that even if some Muslim is seen
prostrating towards a grave then according to Shariah the fatwa of
Shirk/Kufr cannot be passed instantly rather there are strict
pre-requisites to be followed.
Also those who indulge in black
magic and do not repent from it, they turn apostates.
Please
read this important article on "Sajda controversy" Here
The
solution is simple: Go in line with teachings of Nabi (Peace be upon
him) not Wahabi.
More hadiths could be shown but due to brevity
issue these should suffice to suffocate even an extremist Kharj'ite
Wahabi.
The Khawarij ideology may attract even good people
towards them but Beware!
Hadith:
Sa'eed bin Juhman
(rah) narrates: The Khawarij used to invite me (towards their
idology) and It was close that I had joined them (by getting
influenced) but Abu Bilaal's sister saw a dream that Abu Bilaal is
"IN A FORM OF BLACK DOG WITH LONG HAIR" and his eyes were
overflowing. She said: O Abu Bilaal may my father be sacrifised on
you, what is the reason that I saw you like this? Abu Bilaal replied:
We people after you have been turned into "DOGS OF HELL FIRE"
and this Abu Bilaal was one of the leaders in Khawarij [Musannaf Ibn
Abi Shaybah (7/555), Hadith # 37895 with Sahih chain]
Bani
Tameemi person said "No Hukm But of Allah"
Note:
Khawarij used same approach like Wahabis that only Allah is al-Hakim,
please note this is a categorical verse in Qur'an that indeed "THERE
IS NO HUKM EXCEPT OF ALLAH" but this does not mean that great
Prophets and Awliya cannot be Hukaam. Similarly Wahabis say only
Allah is the one whose Tawassul and Istighatha is to be taken
although Ahlus Sunnah believes that Anbiya and Awliya could be called
for intercession and it is proven too from Qur'an and Sunnah.
Imam
Ibn Atheer (rah) narrates in his "Al-Kaamil": Ash'aat bin
Qays started to read the (treaty between Sayyinda Ali and Ameer
Muawiya) to people in every tribe. "WHEN HE REACHED THE TRIBE
BANI TAMEEM" where he read it to Urwa bin Adiya (A Kharj'ite)
who was brother of Abu Bilaal, he (the Kharj'ite) started exclaiming:
You make human beings as Judges between us in Amr of Allah? There is
no Hukm except of Allah! [Narrated by Ibn Atheer in al-Kaamil (3/196)
and Ibn Jawzi in المنتظم
ف تار خٌ الملوک والأمم (5/123)]
This
proves that even the Khawarij who fought with Sayyidna Ali (RA) had
their roots laid in NAJD Bani Tameem. Moving to Iraq and fighting
Sayyidna Ali (RA) does not mean Khawarij had their roots from
Iraq.
The Khawarij will kill Muslims and leave the
idolaters
Vol. 9, Book 93, Hadith 527: (Sahih
Bukhari)
Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: When `Ali was in
Yemen, he sent some gold in its ore to the Prophet. The Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم)
distributed it among Al-Aqra' bin H`Abis Al-Hanzali who belonged to
Bani Mujashi, 'Uyaina bin Badr Al-Fazari, 'Alqama bin 'Ulatha
Al-`Amiri, who belonged to the Bani Kilab tribe and Zaid AI-Khail
at-Ta'i who belonged to Bani Nabhan. So the Quraish and the Ansar
became angry and said, "He gives to the chiefs of Najd and
leaves us!" The Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم)
said, "I just wanted to attract and unite their hearts (make
them firm in Islam)." Then there came a man with sunken eyes,
bulging forehead, thick beard, fat raised cheeks, and clean-shaven
head, and said, "O Muhammad! Be afraid of Allah! " The
Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم)
said, "Who would obey Allah if I disobeyed Him? (Allah). He
trusts me over the people of the earth, but you do not trust me?"
A man from the people (present then), who, I think, was
Khalid
bin Al- Walid, asked for permission to kill him, but the Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم)
prevented him. When the man went away, the Prophet said, "Out of
the offspring of this man, there will be people who will recite the
Qur'an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out
of Islam as an arrow goes out through the game, and they will kill
the Muslims and leave the idolators. Should I live till they appear,
I would kill them as the Killing of the nation of 'Ad."
Now
see Volume 6, Book 60, Number 368 :(Sahih Bukhari) with prorf from
hadith itself that Bani Mujashi was from Najd within the present
Saudi Arabia.
With all the fake Jihad hurled at Muslim
countries the Wahabis get refuted due to above hadith of Khawarij
killing Muslims but sparing the Idolaters. When wahabis are shown
this hadith they give lame excuse that Muslims are the idolaters
(Naudhobillah). There are videos of ISIS (terrorist group in Iraq)
sparing an Indian Nurse out of so called Mercy. The Wahabis were seen
shouting, look how merciful and generous these people are but soon
the Ahlus Sunnah used this above hadith and the Wahabis were
dumbstruck. The same point is tied around their necks as necklace of
thorns.
continue ... Part3: Here
The
misconception that Najd is Iraq and by no means areas in Saudi Arabia
(such as Bani Tamim, Banu Hanifa, Mudar, Rabi'a, Riyadh and such
areas) be included.
+the+best+speech+of+all+people.jpg)
