Wednesday, 12 December 2018



Ibn Taymiyya brazenly claims that everyone including himself was upon misguidance until he somehow supposedly happened upon “trueguidance and was guided:

Ibn Taymiyya mentions in his Majmu’at al-Fatawa (6/258) regarding the issue of non-eternal attributes subsisting in Allah’s essence:

However, this issue, the issue of visitation [to the grave of the Prophet sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam] and other issues besides these have emanated from the later scholars (muta’akh’khirun) and there is a lot of confusion therein.
 At first, even myself and others were upon the way of our forefathers in this – we used to advocate the doctrine of the innovators.
Then when it became clear to us what the Messenger [sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam] has brought, the matter became one of either following what Allah has revealed or following what we found our forefathers uponand what was necessary (wajib) is following the Messenger [sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam].
قال ابن تيمية في مجموع الفتاوى (6/258) عن مسألة حلول الحوادث:
وَلَكِنْ هَذِهِ الْمَسْأَلَةُ وَمَسْأَلَةُ الزِّيَارَةِ وَغَيْرُهُمَا حَدَثَ مِنْ الْمُتَأَخِّرِينَ فِيهَا شُبَهٌ، وَأَنَا وَغَيْرِي كُنَّا عَلَى مَذْهَبِ الْآبَاءِ فِي ذَلِكَ نَقُولُ فِي الْأَصْلَيْنِ بِقَوْلِ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ؛ فَلَمَّا تَبَيَّنَ لَنَا مَا جَاءَ بِهِ الرَّسُولُ دَارَ الْأَمْرُ بَيْنَ أَنْ نَتَّبِعَ مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ أَوْ نَتَّبِعَ مَا وَجَدْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا، فَكَانَ الْوَاجِبُ هُوَ اتِّبَاعُ الرَّسُولِ.

Mu-hammed ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab followed his imam, Ibn Taymiyya, in this respect, while taking it a step further, and based on this perverse understanding, he actually had the audacity to make takfir upon his teachers and all the scholars around him – he basically even made takfir upon himself prior to having supposedly happened upon such “true” guidance:

Mu-hammed ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab mentions in his letter to the Qadi of al-Dir’iya, Shaykh ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Isa, (al-Durar al-Saniyya10/51):

At that time I did not know the meaning of la ilaha illa Allahnor did I know the religion of Islam prior to this blessing which Allah has graciously bestowed. It was the exact same thing with my teachers, none of them had any such knowledge. 
Therefore any of the ‘ulama of ‘Arid, who claimed that he knew the meaning of la ilaha illa Allah or that he knew the meaning of Islam,has certainly lied, falsified, and deceived the people.
If he claimed any of his teachers had any such knowledge, then he has certainly lied, falsified, and deceived the people while praising himself with something which he does not possess.
قال ابن عبد الوهاب في “الدرر السنية” (10/51) في رسالة إلى قاضي الدرعية الشيخ عبد الله ابن عيسى:
وأنا ذلك الوقت لا أعرف معنى “لا إله الا الله” ولا أعرف دين الاسلام قبل هذا الخير الذي مَنَّ الله به، وكذلك مشايخي ما منهم رجل عرف ذلك، فمن زعم من علماء العارض أنه عرف معنى “لا اله الا الله” أو عرف معنى الإسلام قبل هذا الوقت، أو زعم عن مشايخه أن أحداً عرف ذلك، فقد كذب وافترى ولبّس على الناس ومدح نفسه بما ليس فيه.


(Fath Al-Majeed (Sharh Kitab At-Tawheed) By: Shaikh Abdur Rahman Ibn Hasan Aal As'Shaikh By Shaikh Abdul Aziz Bin Baaz)

Ibn Baz: In his commentary of Fath al-Majid, wrote:
أهل مصر أعظم ءالهتهم أحمد البدوي
“The greatest of the Gods of the people of Egypt is Ahmad al-Badawi”
أهل الشام يعبدون ابن عربي
“The people of Sham worship Ibn al-Arabi”
أنتشرت في أهل الحجاز واليمن عبادة الطواغيت والأشجار والأحجار والقبور
“…people of Hijaz and Yemen worship idols, trees, stones and graves”

Quote: Wahhabi/Salafi:

The Wahhabi/Salafi question these so called Misguided (Barelvi/Sufi/Sunni) Mushrik Beliefs:

Q-The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive
Majority Muslims believe: Here
Q-The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is present and can see what is happening, especially immediately after Jumu‘ah prayer.
Majority Muslims believe: The Omnipresence of the Prophet(s): Here
Q-The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will definitely intercede for them.
Majority Muslims believe: Here and Here
Q-They believe in the awliya’ (“saints”) and the occupants of graves, and they pray at their graves and ask them to meet their needs.
Majority Muslims believe in Tawassual/Wasila/Istighatha: Here and Here
Q-They build domes over graves and put lights in them.
Majority Muslims believe: Here
Q-They are known to say “Ya Rasool, Ya Muhammad (O Messenger, O Muhammad) (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
Majority Muslims believe: Here
Q-They get angry with the one who says Ameen out loud and raises his hands when praying, and they regard him as a Wahhaabi.
Majority Muslim believe: Here, Here ,Here and Here
Q-They kiss their fingers during wudoo’, at the time of the adhaan, and after prayer.
Majority Muslim believe: Here
Q-They gather in circles after Jumu‘ah prayer, standing, reciting and reciting poetry in praise of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) loudly.
Majority Muslim believe: Here and Here
“Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on praying behind an imam from the Bareilawi sect, who believes that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive and present and can see us? 
He replied: If they believe that, then they have gone against ijmaa‘ (consensus of the ummah), and if they seek his help, then that is shirk, so it is not permissible to pray behind them. End quote. 

[Thamaraat at-Tadween, p. 8 ] Here

Majority Muslims (Ash’ari/Maturidi) are Misguided

Al-Albaani: If cooperating with a [n ash’ari] man like this does not lead to him [i.e., the Salafi] neglecting his [Salafi’aqidah, then that is something allowed without doubt.
In fact, I believe that part of the religious good of a believer (wahhabi/salafi) who is strong in his eemaan is for him (wahhabi/salafi) to cooperate with other Muslims (Asha’ri/Maturidi) who have, due to reasons past or present, deviated from the Salafi ’aqidah.
It is more deserving for this Salafi believer to cooperate with these people (Majority Muslims) because he will find an appropriate opportunity to convey the Salafi  da’wha to them (Majority Muslims).
And what has happened, and I know this from experience, is that those people (Ash’ari/Maturidi) who oppose us (wahhabi/salafi) will take one of two stances towards this righteous, Salafi believer:
 they will either respond to his call and will thus lean towards accepting the Salafi madhhab and will turn away from their khalafi madhhab—and this has happened many times, or
they will reject him and his madhhab and will refuse to work with him …” 
[Mutafarriqaat lil-Albaani, 6, no. 15.]  Here Note: Above Edited Brackets: (this is what al-Albani and his follower’s wahhabi/salafi mean and believe)
al-Albani compares Hanafi fiqh to the Gospel. [Source: In his commentary 18- on al-Mundhiri's Mukhtasar Sahih Muslim, 3rd ed. (Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, 1977, p. 548)]. Note: This phrase was removed from later editions.
al-Albani said: "Many of those who interpret figuratively [the Divine Attributes] are not heretics (zanâdiqa), but they say what heretics say," and "figurative interpretation is the very same as nullification (al-ta'wîl `ayn al-ta`tîl)." (1)
Albani suggests that Imam al-Bukhari is a disbeliever for interpreting the Divine Face as dominion or sovereignty (mulk) in the verse"Everything will perish save His countenance" (28:88) in the book of Tafsir in his Sahih: "Except His wajh means except His mulk, and it is also said: Except whatever was for the sake of His countenance."
al-Albani blurts out: "No true believer would say such a thing" and "We should consider al-Bukhari innocent of that statement."(2)
(1) Fatawa (p. 522-523) and Mukhtasar al-`Uluw (p. 23f.).
(2) Fatawa (p. 523).

He declared Imam Bukhari as ‘Mushrik’ (Nauzubillahi) for translating ‘Wajhu’ as ‘dominion and sovereignty (mulk) in verse كُلُّ شَيْءٍ هَالِكٌإِلَّا وَجْهَهُ ۚ(Meaning – Everything will perish save His countenance (Al-Qasas – 88) in the ‘Book of Tafsir in Sahih Bukhari.
He wroteNo true believer would say such a thing” and “We should consider Bukhari innocent of that statement”(Look how intelligently he is branding Imam Bukhari as Mushrik (Astghfiruallah ). Reference:(Introduction to al-San’ani’s Raf al-Astar – page 24-25).

Major Wahhabi theologian Abdullah al-Ghunaymnrecommending violence against the Ash’aris!


Wahhabi theologian  ABDULLAH AL-GHUNAYMAN  considered a major shaykh / Allamah by the Pseudo- Salafis, in the text above confirms that most of the followers of the four madhhabs are Ash’ari.  
He goes on to suggest stopping the Ash’aris ‘with books and refutations and occasionally, when required, deploying physical force (literally: brandishing weapons) ‘Such is the depravity of the Wahhabi movement – if you can’t defeat your opponent intellectually – just kill him / her.
He was appointed a member of the permanent Committee for scholarly research and verdicts, and a member of the Committee of Major Wahhabi/Salafi Scholars
His teachers:

Abdul-Azeez ibn `Abdillaah ibn Baaz
Abdullaah al-Khulayfee
Abdul-Azeez ibn Rasheed
Muhammad al-Ameen ash-Shanqeetee
Abdur-Rahmaan al-Ifreeqee
Abdur-Razzaaq Afeefee
Abdul-Fattaah Qaaree al-Bukhaaree

ABDULLAH AL-GHUNAYMAN...  ( "what he said: Here
(*the concept of Ahlu Sunnah has two meanings: [...] and this is what sheikh ul islam ibn taymiyyah also said...)
Note The " IF " you mean and the second meaning:
(*But 2nd meaning: there is only one Ahlu Sunnah wal Jamah that is  Ahlul Hadith and the Salafis and
the rest of the groups are not from Ahlu Sunnah  wal Jamah, Ash'ari,Maturidi whoever they might be...)
What sheikh Ghunayman meant:
Note The "Pure Ones" ?
(*if there is a "situation"... Yani that place you do not have "The Pure Ones"  the  Ahlul Hadith/Salafi ...)
*Ibn Hajar Asqalani was not Ash'ari...(hmmm)
*Saladin was an Ash'ari...(but he was not PURE according to you!)
watch video : Here

Misguided Innovators Bidah, Shirk & Mushrik:

انظر كتاب ابن عثيمين "لقاء الباب المفتوح"
راجع الشريط المسجل بصوت شيخ للوهابية جاسر الحجازي وعلى موقعهم في الانترنت. ولدينا الشريط
انظر نفس المصدر في الشريط المسجل بصوت جاسر الحجازي وانظر كتابهم "فتح المجيد" لعبد الرحمن حسن بن محمد بن عبد الوهاب، ص/352
انظر كتابهم "فتح المجيد"
 وانظر نفس المصدر في الشريط المسجل بصوت جاسر الحجازي
انظر مقدمة محمد بن صالح الفوزان عن الكتاب المسمى "التوحيد" لابن خزيمة
انظر كتابهم المسمى "المجموع المفيد من عقيدة التوحيد" ص 55 وكتاب "إعصار التوحيد" لنبيل محمد.
انظر كتابهم المسمى "حلقات ممنوعة" تأليف حسام العقاد ص 25
انظر كتاب ابن عبد الوهاب المسمى التوحيد. وانظر كلام مفتي مكة "الدرر السنية" ص 42 وما بعدها.
انظر كتابهم المسمى "إعصار التوحيد" لنبيل محمد

- They declared Imam Nawawiy, Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalaniy, Imam Suyutiy as misguided in creed
- They declared Sultan Salahud-Deen al-‘Ayoubiy as Misguided Aqeedah
- They denounce the Ottoman Sultans as Mushrik blasphemers
- They declared as a blasphemer Sultan Muhammad al-Fatih (whom the Prophet(s) praised)
- They claim that all Asharis (like Nawawiy) and Maturidis (like Nasafiy) whom are the Majority of Ahlus-Sunnah are misguided Bidah/Shirk=Mushrik
- They claim that all Islamic Sufism is Shirk and must be eradicated and targeted
- They declare Shirk on the one who says “la ilaha illallah” in the count of 1,000 times
- They claim that Islam ceased to exist between Ibn Taimiyah (Hidden for 400 years!Here) until Ibn Abdul-Wahhab revived it.
- They declare Muslim countries upon Bidah/Shirk


Wahhabi/Salafi: "Imams al-Ghazali, an-Nawawiy, as-Suyutiy, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaniy, al-Bayhaqiy, al-Qurtubiy, an-Nasafiy, at-Tahawiy (whom are all Ash^aris and Maturidiswere all deviant’s misguided aqidah"
[Misguided Innovators]  
The Rashidun Caliphate (632–661) – Beginning of the Islamic Empire
The Umayyad Caliphate (661–750) – Successor of the Rashidun Caliphate
The Umayyad Caliphate of Cordoba in Islamic Spain (929–1031)
The Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258) – Successor of the Umayyad Caliphate, Fall of Baghdad (1258)
The Fatimid Caliphate (909–1171) End of the Arab Empire
The Almohad Caliphate (1121–1269)
The Ottoman Caliphate (1362–1924)
The Sokoto Caliphate (1804-1903)
The Sharifian Caliphate (1924-1925)
Muslim Rule in India (712-1857)
Paradise - The Garden is only for Ibn Taymiyyah and his followers...

Saudi Arabia Population-34Million- 31Million Muslims  [You decide Do not forget people of Hijaz] ?

1.8 Billion Muslims

Now according to Wahhabi/Salafi belief:

[Misguided Innovators Bidah/Shirk]  

-Turkey=81 Million=Majority=sufi=mawlid=Misguided=[Mushrik]
-Pakistan=Population 202 Million-195 Million Muslim=Majority=Maturudi/Ash'ari/sufi/barelvi/milad un Nabi celebrators Bidah/Shirk=Majority=[Mushrik]
-India=Muslims population=194M=majority=Maturudi/Ash'ari/sufi/barelvi-milad=Bidah/Shirk=[Mushrik]
Bangladesh=Muslims=150M=Majority= [Mushrik]
-Indonesia=Population=268M -230 Million Muslim=Majority=[Mushrik]

Algeria=41M= Majority=[Mushrik]
Tunsia-11M=Majority= [Mushrik]
-Egypt=97M= Majority=[Mushrik]
China =Muslim Population=25M=Majority=[Mushrik]
USA=3.5M=Muslims=Majority= [Mushrik]
UK= 2.7M=Muslims= Majority=[Mushrik]
Europe (2010=44 Million Muslims)= Majority= [Mushrik]


Narrated 'Uqba bin 'Amir: One day the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم went out and offered the funeral prayers of the martyrs of Uhud and then went up the pulpit and said, "I will pave the way for you as your predecessor and will be a witness on you. By Allah! I see my Fount (Kauthar) just now and I have been given the keys of all the treasures of the earth (or the keys of the earth) "BY ALLAH! I AM NOT AFRAID YOU WILL WORSHIP OTHERS ALONG WITH ALLAH AFTER MY DEATH, BUT I AM AFRAID YOU WILL FIGHT WITH ONE ANOTHER FOR WORLDLY THINGS" 
[Sahih Bukhari: Volume: 2, Book 23, Hadith, 428]

This hadith categorically proves that Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) did not fear we will indulge in Shirk.

The Wahhabi/Salafis try to misinterpret this hadith by saying it refers only to the tenure of Sahaba.

Let's read Fath ul Bari Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari in this regard:

Hafidh Ibn Hajr al-‘Asqallaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The words “I do not fear that you will associate others with Allah” mean: (I do not fear that you will do that) "ALL TOGETHER, BECAUSE THAT HAPPENED WITH SOME OF THEM" may Allah protect us. This hadeeth is one of the miracles of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), hence the author narrated it under the heading of the signs of Prophethood. [Fath al-Baari, 3/211]

Plus this hadith is "general" in meaning and cannot be made Khaas until and unless there is a specific hadith which categorically says that it applies only on Sahaba.

No general hukm of Prophet (s)can be made Khass without another Nass on it.
Also remember this hadith says "YOU WILL FIGHT WITH ONE ANOTHER FOR WORLDLY THINGS" so if we apply it only on Sahaba them Rawafid/Shia would become right in asserting that Sahaba fought with each other on worldly things (Naudhobllah)

حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو خَالِدٍ الأَحْمَرُ، عَنْ كَثِيرِ بْنِ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ رُبَيْحِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، قَالَ خَرَجَ عَلَيْنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ وَنَحْنُ نَتَذَاكَرُ الْمَسِيحَ الدَّجَّالَ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ أَلاَ أُخْبِرُكُمْ بِمَا هُوَ أَخْوَفُ عَلَيْكُمْ عِنْدِي مِنَ الْمَسِيحِ الدَّجَّالِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ قُلْنَا بَلَى ‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ الشِّرْكُ الْخَفِيُّ أَنْ يَقُومَ الرَّجُلُ يُصَلِّي فَيُزَيِّنُ صَلاَتَهُ لِمَا يَرَى مِنْ نَظَرِ رَجُلٍ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
It was narrated that Abu Sa’eed said: “The Messenger of Allah () came out to us when we were discussing Dajjal (False Christ) and said: ‘Shall I not tell you of that which I fear more for you than Dajjal?’ We said: ‘Yes.’ "HE SAID: HIDDEN POLYTHEISM (SHIRK AL-KHAFI)" when a man stands to pray and makes it look good because he sees a man looking at him.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1 B37, Hadith,4204]

This hadith is declared "Good" by leading Muhadith of Salafis i.e. Zubayr Ali Zai [Dar-us-Salam English Version of Ibn Majah, Hadith # 4204]
The Prophet (Peace be upon him) feared "SHIRK AL-KHAFI (HIDDEN/MINOR SHIRK)" more than he feared Dajjal and this is a proof that Prophet (Peace be upon him) did not fear of Shirk al-Jalli (Shirk al Akbar) to become prevalent in Majority of Ummah.

Although this chain is weak but the hadith becomes authentic due to previous hadith shown and many other Shawahid.

Imam al-Hakim narrates that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: I fear upon my ummah the "SMALLER" from of Shirk (polytheism) and desire.  Shaddad (RA) asked the Prophet (Peace be upon him): Would your Ummah associate partners with Allah after you? The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Yes, (but) "THEY WILL NOT WORSHIP THE SUN OR THE MOON OR STONES OR IDOLS, BUT THEY WILL DO ACTIONS TO PLEASE OTHERS" [al-Hakim in Mustadrak ala Sahihayn, Volume # 4, Page # 366]
Imam al-Hakim (rah) said after this hadith:
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد ولم يخرجاه
Translation: This hadith has "SAHIH CHAIN" but is not narrated (by Bukhari and Muslim) [ibid]

This hadith is narrated by a totally different chain from the previous one, so this also becomes authentic due to Usool ul hadith.

Book 39, Hadith 6752: (Sahh Muslim)
حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، وَإِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، قَالَ إِسْحَاقُ أَخْبَرَنَا وَقَالَ، عُثْمَانُ حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ أَبِي سُفْيَانَ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ ‏ "‏ إِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ قَدْ أَيِسَ أَنْ يَعْبُدَهُ الْمُصَلُّونَ فِي جَزِيرَةِ الْعَرَبِ وَلَكِنْ فِي التَّحْرِيشِ بَيْنَهُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (صلى الله عليه وسلم) as saying: Verily, the "SATAN HAS LOST ALL HOPES" that the worshipers would ever worship (him) in the peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them.

This hadith proves that Wahabi/Salafi movement was based on false grounds by  M-uhammed bin Abdul Wahab who declared Muslims in Arabia of Shirk.

 One who accuses other Muslim of Shirk is more deserving to be Mushrik

أن حذيفة يعني ابن اليمان رضي الله عنه حدثه قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلّم «إن مما أتخوف عليكم رجل قرأ القرآن حتى إذا رؤيت بهجته عليه وكان رداؤه الإسلام اعتراه إلى ما شاء الله انسلخ منه ونبذه وراء ظهره وسعى على جاره بالسيف ورماه بالشرك» قال قلت يانبي الله أيهما أولى بالشرك المرمي أو الرامي ؟ قال «بل الرامي»
إسناد جيد
Translation: Hudhaifa i.e. Ibn al Yaman (ra) said that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Verily, I fear about a man from you who will read the Qur'an so much that his face will become enlightened and he will come to personify Islam. This will continue until Allah desires. Then these things will be taken away from him when he will disregard them by putting them all behind his back and will attack his neighbour with the sword accusing him of Shirk. "THE PROPHET WAS ASKED - WHICH OF THE TWO WILL BE DESERVING OF SUCH AN ACCUSATION? - THE ATTACKER OR THE ATTACKED? THE PROPHET REPLIED: THE ATTACKER (ONE ACCUSING THE OTHER OF SHIRK)
[References with Authentication on Hadith: It is Narrated by Ibn Hibban in his Sahih, Volume No. 1, Page No. 282, Bukhari in his Tarikh ul Kabir, Volume No. 4, Page No. 301, Haythami in Majma uz Zawaid, where he declared its chain to be “Good”, Imam Ibn Kathir declared the Chain as “Jayyid (strong)" in his Tafsir al Qur'an al Azim, Volume No. 2, Page No. 266]

What a beautiful hadith without doubt. Indeed the extremists who accuse majority of Muslims of Shirk are directly proven as Mushrikeen themselves according to Sayyidna Muhammad (Salallaho alaihi wasalam). If they still persist in their Baatil taweel then here are other Hadiths which we Muslims should always keep handy to prove extremists as cheaters and Liars.

عن عبيد الله بن عمر عن نافع أن رجلا قال لإبن عمر أن لي جارا يشهد علي بالشرك فقال قل لا إله إلا الله تكذبه
From `Ubayd Allah ibn `Umar, from Nafi`: A man said to Ibn `Umar: "I have a neighbour who bears witness against me that I commit shirk." He replied: "Say: 'La Ilaha ill Allah,' you will make him a liar."[Imam Ibn Asakir in Tibiyeen al Kidhb al Muftari, Page No. 373]

عكرمة يعني ابن عمار قال ثنا سوار بن شبيب الأعرجي قال كنت قاعدا عند ابن عمر فجاء رجل فقال يا ابن عمر إن أقواما يشهدون علينا بالكفر والشرك فقال ويلك أفلا قلت لا إله إلا الله قال فقال أهل البيت لا إله إلا الله حتى ارتج البيت
Translation: Akrama i.e. Ibn Ammar said that he heard Sawwar ibn Shabib al-A`raji say that he was sitting in Ibn `Umar's house when a man came and said: "O Ibn `Umar! There are groups of people bearing witness against us and attributing to us kufr and shirk." Ibn `Umar replied: "Woe to you! Did you not say: 'La Ilaha iL Allah'?!" Whereupon the entire household began to say La Ilaha Ill Allah until the house was shaking. [Ibid]


(Edited by ADHM)