Wahhabi/Deobandi
Fatwa:
“Darud Taj
is Shirk”
---
---
When
the Wahabis of
India objected on Darud
Taj , the great Hanafi scholar,
Mujaddid of the last century , Imam Ahmed Raza
Khan [Rd] wrote:
Al-Amnu
wa al-'Ula : ''
Li Naa'iti al-Mustafa bi Daafi'i al-Balaa ''
Safety and Greatness for those who describe the Chosen One as the Eliminator of Difficulty
Imam Ahmad Rida Khan(ra)
''Al Amnu wa al-'Ula Li Naa'iti al-Mustafa bi Daafi'i al-Balaa ''
Translated into English by : Muhammad Hussain al-Qadiri
First Edition - United Kingdom
In 1311H /1893CE, Mawlana Karamatullah Khan sahib of Delhi sent a question to Imam Ahmad Raza Khan, Radi Allahu anhu.
Safety and Greatness for those who describe the Chosen One as the Eliminator of Difficulty
Imam Ahmad Rida Khan(ra)
''Al Amnu wa al-'Ula Li Naa'iti al-Mustafa bi Daafi'i al-Balaa ''
Translated into English by : Muhammad Hussain al-Qadiri
First Edition - United Kingdom
In 1311H /1893CE, Mawlana Karamatullah Khan sahib of Delhi sent a question to Imam Ahmad Raza Khan, Radi Allahu anhu.
The
question was about the leader of the innovators, Mu-hammed
Ismail Dehlvi (d. 1242H/ 1831CE) and his
people, who have criticised the
reading of Durud-e-Taj.
They
say it is shirk
[polytheism] as the words ''Dafi
al-Bala wa al-Waba'' and other words have been used to denote
the power gifted to Prophet, Salla
Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam, by Allah,
the All-Powerful.
These
words penetrate their hearts
because according to their satanic beliefs,
to call the Prophet as an
elder brother, and to call him helpless, powerless and weak is all
acceptable.
Imam
Ahmad Raza, Radi Allahu anhu, was asked to answer
their false
beliefs.
Imam
Ahmad Raza, Radi
Allahu anhu, answered them by writing,
''Al
Amnu wa al-'Ula Li Naa'iti al-Mustafa bi Daafi'i al-Balaa (in
1311H).
He
proved
the powers of
the Prophet of Allah through sixty
(60) verses of
the Qur'an and three
hundred (300)
Ahadith.
This great book was written to prove the power of the Prophet, Salla Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam, and has been unreciprocated for the last 68 years (now 117 years), and those who burn by reading the virtues and authority of the great Beloved of Allah, SallaAllahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam, have been helpless and could not challenge this book. And through the grace of Allah it will remain the same, ''And Allah allows not the guile of betrayers'' - (Surah Yusuf 12: 52).
In this book, the beliefs of the 'People of the Truth' - Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah; have been clarified beautifully. Here the Wahabis are disturbed by the fact that if they would accept the sixty verses of the Qur'an and the three hundred Ahadith, then they would have to accept their predecessors as the insulters of the Prophet and the close Friends of Allah Almighty.
This great book was written to prove the power of the Prophet, Salla Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam, and has been unreciprocated for the last 68 years (now 117 years), and those who burn by reading the virtues and authority of the great Beloved of Allah, SallaAllahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam, have been helpless and could not challenge this book. And through the grace of Allah it will remain the same, ''And Allah allows not the guile of betrayers'' - (Surah Yusuf 12: 52).
In this book, the beliefs of the 'People of the Truth' - Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah; have been clarified beautifully. Here the Wahabis are disturbed by the fact that if they would accept the sixty verses of the Qur'an and the three hundred Ahadith, then they would have to accept their predecessors as the insulters of the Prophet and the close Friends of Allah Almighty.
How
then will they accept it when they have kept their predecessors close
as ''Arbaaban
Min Dunillah'' - ''gods besides Allah'' (Surah
at-Touba 9: 31)
If only those who give verdicts of Shirk against Muslims understand the concept that their own predecessors are committing polytheism.'' by 'Abd al-Hakim Khan Mujaddidi Mazhrai [1395 H / 1975 CE]
-Contains Explanatory footnotes with full references.
-Highly Recommended !
-First ever English Translation
If only those who give verdicts of Shirk against Muslims understand the concept that their own predecessors are committing polytheism.'' by 'Abd al-Hakim Khan Mujaddidi Mazhrai [1395 H / 1975 CE]
-Contains Explanatory footnotes with full references.
-Highly Recommended !
-First ever English Translation
Later
another great Hanafi scholar, Syed
Kazmi [rd]
wrote:
“Darud
Taz per Aitraaz ke Jawab” (Answer to
the objections on Darud
Taj)
In
this book he showed disrespect to Holy
Prophet (sal allahu alayhi wa sallam) and
called Muslims as “mushrik”.
Continuing
his evil work, his followers:
Rashid Ahmad Gangohi issued
a fatwa that reciting
Darud Taj
is shirk (polytheism).
(Fatawa
Rashidiyyah, Kitab al-’Ilm; p.169, Dar al-Isha’at)
Quote:
Question:
What do scholars of religion, Allah have mercy upon you, say about the proof, virtues and reward for Durud Taaj? It is generally famous among the laity and particularly the ignoramus and whether the following words of it are affiliated towards Holy Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace); dafi’ al-bala’ (remover of distress), wa al-waba’ (and epidemic), wa al-kaht (and drought), wa al-mardh (and ailment), wa al-‘alm (and agony). Now whether reciting it and having the belief of its virtues and reward is established and correct from legal proofs or not or is it shirk and bid’ah?
Answer:
What do scholars of religion, Allah have mercy upon you, say about the proof, virtues and reward for Durud Taaj? It is generally famous among the laity and particularly the ignoramus and whether the following words of it are affiliated towards Holy Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace); dafi’ al-bala’ (remover of distress), wa al-waba’ (and epidemic), wa al-kaht (and drought), wa al-mardh (and ailment), wa al-‘alm (and agony). Now whether reciting it and having the belief of its virtues and reward is established and correct from legal proofs or not or is it shirk and bid’ah?
Answer:
Whatever
virtues of this durud are mentioned by some ignoramus are false and
its status is impossible to know except that from Holy Messenger
(Allah bless him and give him peace) himself, and this durud was
written after passing of [many] centuries. So
how can these wordings of [this] durud can be considered as
rewarding? So to
leave the wordings that have appeared in authentic narrations and to
expect abundance of reward in this [Durud Taaj] and
to recite it is innovation of deviancy. And because it contains words
that are shirkiyyah (polytheistic)
and there is fear
for corruptness of belief of laity hence its
recital is prohibited. So
to instruct Durud Taaj is akin to giving poison to laity. Because
many people fall into prey of polytheistic beliefs and it becomes a
cause of their peril. (Fatawa
Rashidiyyah, Kitab al-’Ilm; p.169, Dar al-Isha’at)
Also
Zakariyya Kandahlawi
Mu-hammed
Zakariyya was
a deobandi/Tablighi
hadith scholar of
India.
He was given the honorary title of : " Shaykh
al-Hadith" ("Great
Scholar of Hadith") by
his teacher:
Khalil
Ahmad Anbethawi (Saharanpuri)!
-------------------------------------------------------
Zakariya
Kandehelvi "Shaykh
al-Hadith" said:
“It
is Haraam to read or recite Durood-e-Taj...This
Durood is disliked.”
--------------------------------------------------------
Reference -
Zakariya Kandehelvi, Faza'el Amaal, page 52 and 73, Chapter Fazaa'ele
Durood, Maktaba Aarifeen, Karachi Publication.
---
Darud Taj
Darud
Taj is recited by a
huge Muslim population and it has nothing but love and praise of
the best of the
creation, the Most
Beloved of Allah (
sal allahu alayhi wa sallam).
By
calling the majority of the Muslims as “ mushrik”
(polytheist) !
Rashid
Ahmad Gangohi created division and confusion among
the Muslims.
The British succeeded
in using deobandi as a tool in dividing Muslims.
Readers
should note that deobandi group
is just another name for Wahabis.
The evil methodology of
calling Muslims polytheists has
since continued.
Mufti Taqi Usmani
Quote
a deobandi said:
"Mufti
Taqi Usmani on Durud
Taaj, etc.
Invented duruds, e.g. Durud Taaj contain words contrary to Shari'ah and many such duruds also contain polythestic words.”
Invented duruds, e.g. Durud Taaj contain words contrary to Shari'ah and many such duruds also contain polythestic words.”
The
present fatwa from deoband is
a
reminder to this
fact.
Rashid
Gangohi Fatwas: On "Darud
Taj"
[The
invocation of blessings on the Prophet called:"The
Crown"
Question:
What
do the 'ulama of Deen say in regard to the excellence, merits and
proofs of Durood-e-Taj which is established among
the majority of Muslims especially amongst the ignorant, and in which
the following words [=qualities] are ascribed to
the Prophet ('alaihis salaam) :
"One
who repels calamities, epidemics, droughts, ailments and anxieties."
Is
the recitation of this Durood and accepting its excellence and merits
is established/proven by the Shariah ruling or not? Or is it Shirk?
or Bid'a ?
Answer: [From
Rashid Gangohi]
Whatever
excellence is attributed to Durood-e-Taj by
the ignorant (jahil) is absolutely wrong. And its status is
impossible to be defined, until outlined by the Legislator (Holy
Prophet) 'alaihi salaam. And this Durood was drafted years after
[him].
So how can the reading of this wording (seegha) of durood be declared worthy of reward? To disregard the wordings of durood which are established by sahih hadith and hope for merits in this (durood) and reciting it, is Bid'a Dalaala. And since there are shirkiyah statements (contaminated with shirk) included in it, there is a great danger of misleading the beliefs of masses. So the reading of this Durood is FORBIDDEN. And the teaching of Durood-e-Taj to the masses is like giving them lethal poison, because many people will become victims of contaminated shirk beliefs and that causes them to be destroyed.
Source: Fatawa-e-Rashidia
Lahore ed. page 162, Delhi ed. Volume 3, Page 98-9,
Lines 9,10,11,12 and 1,2,3,4
Lahore ed. page 162, Delhi ed. Volume 3, Page 98-9,
Lines 9,10,11,12 and 1,2,3,4
---
*A
recent fatwa
issued by
Deoband
has repeated
this wahabi verdict
Deoband
Fatwa- Answer
3186
-04 Mar, 2008- (Fatwa
196/197=L):
The
virtue and merit of Durood-e-Taj mentioned
by ignorant Muslims
is mere nonsense and baseless.
The other duroods narrated in traditions are far better. The
Durood-e-Taj contains some words leading to shirk (associating
God with Allah), so it must not
be recited. It has no base in Shariah.
and Allah (Subhana Wa Ta'ala) Knows Best
Darul Ifta, Darul Uloom Deoband
and Allah (Subhana Wa Ta'ala) Knows Best
Darul Ifta, Darul Uloom Deoband
--------------------------------------------------------
Q:) Is
it permissible to recite the Salawat known as Durud
at-Taj?
Another Deobandi
Mufti who
is in a habit of presenting deobandi
false belief in
a sugar
coated way
to the Muslim population, says: [...]
“...In
conclusion,
there are three conditions for the permissibility of reciting the
Salawat known as Durood
al-Taj.
If these three points are taken care of, then one will be rewarded
for sending blessings upon the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him
& give him peace) and achieve proximity to him in this world
and the next.
a) This Salawat should not be considered to be specifically established through the Sunna, neither should it be considered superior to other forms of Salawat that are established and narrated from the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace).
b) One should avoid attaching benefits of reciting this Salawat that are connected to the hereafter. However, there is nothing wrong in mentioning the many worldly benefits of reciting it, as they are based upon experience.
c) The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) must be considered a “means” of removing afflictions, sicknesses, droughts and the like, whilst Allah Most High must be regarded the absolute remover of all pains and calamities.
Some individuals may not be giving due attention to one, two or all three of the above mentioned conditions; hence it would be wise to explain the matter to them. It is in this context that some scholars of the past prohibited its recitation, for they saw the non-observance of these conditions.
a) This Salawat should not be considered to be specifically established through the Sunna, neither should it be considered superior to other forms of Salawat that are established and narrated from the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace).
b) One should avoid attaching benefits of reciting this Salawat that are connected to the hereafter. However, there is nothing wrong in mentioning the many worldly benefits of reciting it, as they are based upon experience.
c) The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) must be considered a “means” of removing afflictions, sicknesses, droughts and the like, whilst Allah Most High must be regarded the absolute remover of all pains and calamities.
Some individuals may not be giving due attention to one, two or all three of the above mentioned conditions; hence it would be wise to explain the matter to them. It is in this context that some scholars of the past prohibited its recitation, for they saw the non-observance of these conditions.
However,
if these conditions are taken care off, then there is nothing wrong
whatsoever in reciting this Salawat (Durood al-Taj), and one will be
rewarded for doing so.
And
Allah knows best”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Zakariya
Kandhalvi don't forget "Shaykh
al-Hadith" al
deobandi compiled
“Fazil
e Darud sheriff” (virtues of
sending blessings upon prophet)
in which most of
the darud
is not authentically related from the prophet!
There
are literally hundreds of supplications by pious latter-day Muslims
that were compiled years after the Prophet ( sal
allahu alayhi wa sallam), such as the famous Ahzab by al-Shadhili,
al-Rifa`i, etc.
Most
especially Dala'il al-Khayrat by al-Jazuli which
is nothing but Durood, some of it from the Sunna and some of it from
the heart of the author; not to mention the countless poems to the
same end by the Awliya' such as al-Busiri (whose Qasidat
al-Burda apparently is in the Deobandi
syllabus), al-Nabahani, Shaykh Muhammad al-Burhani, etc.
As
for the statement, "its status is
impossible to be defined, until outlined by the Legislator (Holy
Prophet) 'alaihi salaam. And this Durood was drafted years after
[him].
So
how can the reading of this wording (seegha) of durood be declared
worthy of reward?"
This
criticism is astounding in
view of the fact that it applies to much of Dala'il
al-Khayrat, although the latter booklet of Salawat is part of the
daily recitations of the Deobandi
Shuyukh as reported by the Shaykh's student Khalil
Saharanfuri in al-Muhannad (Karachi ed. p. 24-25):
"We
consider it desirable to invoke blessings on the Prophet ( sal allahu
alayhi wa sallam) abundantly and this is among the best acts of
obedience and among the recommended acts that are closest to being
obligations, whether through the recitation of the Dala'il
[al-Khayrat] and the Awrad of Salawat composed in that chapter, or
with other texts. However, the best according to us is whatever
wording is authentically narrated from him. But if one uses other
than what was reported from him , then *such can never be devoid of
merit* and it deserves the glad tidings of [the hadith] 'Whoever
invokes one blessing upon me, Allah blesses him ten times. AND
OUR SHAYKH THE `ALLAMA AL-GANGOHI USED TO RECITE THE DALA'IL
[AL-KHAYRAT] and so did the rest of our Shuyukh... and they
used to transmit the narration of the Dala'il just like hadith
narrations, and Mawlana al-Gangohi would give ijaza for it to his
friends, Allah have mercy on him."
Please
note: Deobandis wrote Al-
Muhannad only to fool the Sunni
Arab scholars.
Deobandi
objection is on this part:
“One
who repels calamities, epidemics, droughts, ailments and anxieties”
(
dafi’ al-bala’I wal- waba’I wal-qahti wal- maradi wal –alam)
Now, Readers
will be Shocked!
to see hypocrisy of these
deobandi “akabir” (deobandi elders)
After Shaykh
Rashid Gangohi died , his student , Mahmoodul
Hasan wrote elegy (song written in praise
of dead) for Mawlana Rashid
Gangohee!
Mawlana
Mahmoodul Hasan is
called “shaykhul Hind”
by the deobandis and
he is among deobandi “
akabir”
The
elegy has following wording:
“My
guides, my teachers, for me the be-all and end-all,
You are my masters, my patrons and my princes.
You are my masters, my patrons and my princes.
Rasheed and Qaasim-i-Kairaat, both are venerated teachers
Both of them are Qibla-e-Deen and Ka'ba-e-lmaan".
To
whom shall I now turn for the redress of my needs!
The redresser of all my physical and spiritual needs is now gone. "
The redresser of all my physical and spiritual needs is now gone. "
"He
is the second Junaid and Shiblee and Abu Mas'ood Ansari,
He is the Rasheed-e-Millat-o-Deen, the Ghaus-e-A'zam, the Qutb-e-Rabbani."
He is the Rasheed-e-Millat-o-Deen, the Ghaus-e-A'zam, the Qutb-e-Rabbani."
(Ghaus" means
one who redresses one's grievances.) And
Mahmood-ul-Hasan Sahib addresses Gangohi Sahib not only as "Ghaus"
but as "Ghaus-e-A'zam
Even
while present in the Ka'bah, it is a very good act to
remember Gangoh.
Here:
"At
the Ka'bah they went about inquiring about the way to Gangoh
Those
that had in their hearts a keen desire to get at the truth".
Scan
Click on ^scan -
---
Mawlana
Rashid Gangohee writes
in his Fatwa:
“ Those who read and write Marsiyah ( elegy =song written in praise of dead ) are Fasiq ( sinner) ( Vol 2 , page 39)
Mawlana Rashid Gangohee also writes:
“All the marsiyah which is read in praise of martyrs of Karbala should either be burnt or buried” ( Fatwa Rashidiya p 276. Karanchi edition. )
In another work with the name: “ Haarikul Asrar “ which used to come as a supplement along with “Taqwiyatul Iman” it is written that to read and write marsiyah is the work of Majoosi ( fire worshipper).
The "Sheikh-ul-Hind" of the Deoband, Janab Mahmood-ul-Hasan, sought remedies for all his needs from the Imam of Deobandis , Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi Sahib!
“ Those who read and write Marsiyah ( elegy =song written in praise of dead ) are Fasiq ( sinner) ( Vol 2 , page 39)
Mawlana Rashid Gangohee also writes:
“All the marsiyah which is read in praise of martyrs of Karbala should either be burnt or buried” ( Fatwa Rashidiya p 276. Karanchi edition. )
In another work with the name: “ Haarikul Asrar “ which used to come as a supplement along with “Taqwiyatul Iman” it is written that to read and write marsiyah is the work of Majoosi ( fire worshipper).
The "Sheikh-ul-Hind" of the Deoband, Janab Mahmood-ul-Hasan, sought remedies for all his needs from the Imam of Deobandis , Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi Sahib!
He
says:
" To whom shall I now turn for the redress of my needs!
The redresser of all my physical and spiritual needs is now gone. "
"Ghaus" means one who redresses one's grievances. And Mahmood-ul-Hasan Sahib addresses Gangohi Sahib not only as "Ghaus" but as "Ghaus-e-A'zam". Just see.
"He is the second Junaid and Shiblee and Abu Mas'ood Ansari,
He is the Rasheed-e-Millat-o-Deen, the Ghaus-e-A'zam, the Qutb-e-Rabbani".
Mahmood-ul-Hasan Sahib declared Gangohi Sahib to be not only all these things, but also as "Murrabiye-Khalaaiq", "Maseehaa-i-Zamaan, Qaseem-i-Faiz-e-Yazdaah, the equal of the founder of Islam, host to all creations, Muhyud Deen Jeelaani, the fountainhead of all beneficence, without any parallel, the object of veneration and reverence in this world and in the next, the light through and through, and Allah alone knows what else besides. In the compendium of his poetical works, he says:
"My guides, my teachers, for me the be-all and end-all,
You are my masters, my patrons and my princes.
Rasheed and Qaasim-i-Kairaat, both are venerated teachers
We sent these original lines to different Deobandi Mufti asking them whether these type of statements constitute kufr or not?
" To whom shall I now turn for the redress of my needs!
The redresser of all my physical and spiritual needs is now gone. "
"Ghaus" means one who redresses one's grievances. And Mahmood-ul-Hasan Sahib addresses Gangohi Sahib not only as "Ghaus" but as "Ghaus-e-A'zam". Just see.
"He is the second Junaid and Shiblee and Abu Mas'ood Ansari,
He is the Rasheed-e-Millat-o-Deen, the Ghaus-e-A'zam, the Qutb-e-Rabbani".
Mahmood-ul-Hasan Sahib declared Gangohi Sahib to be not only all these things, but also as "Murrabiye-Khalaaiq", "Maseehaa-i-Zamaan, Qaseem-i-Faiz-e-Yazdaah, the equal of the founder of Islam, host to all creations, Muhyud Deen Jeelaani, the fountainhead of all beneficence, without any parallel, the object of veneration and reverence in this world and in the next, the light through and through, and Allah alone knows what else besides. In the compendium of his poetical works, he says:
"My guides, my teachers, for me the be-all and end-all,
You are my masters, my patrons and my princes.
Rasheed and Qaasim-i-Kairaat, both are venerated teachers
We sent these original lines to different Deobandi Mufti asking them whether these type of statements constitute kufr or not?
We
did not tell them that these lines are from their own
scholar!
The deobandi muftis were United that all thes statements constitute KUFR!
So the deobandi scholars have done takfir upon their own sheikhul Hind, Mawalan Mahmoodul Hasan,
Kindly see the scan of original fatwa issued by deobandi muftis:
The deobandi muftis were United that all thes statements constitute KUFR!
So the deobandi scholars have done takfir upon their own sheikhul Hind, Mawalan Mahmoodul Hasan,
Kindly see the scan of original fatwa issued by deobandi muftis:
Click on ^scan to
---
Deobandi 3 Conditions
Click ^image Enlarge
---
---
Haaji
Imdaadullaah Sahib,( the
supreme spiritual guide of all
Deobandis)
after the death of his spiritual guide and teacher, Maulana
Noor Muhammad Sahib,
calls out to him thus:
“Why
should Imdaad have any fear when you are there to help me,
But
my hands and feet tremble when I listen to the talk of love.
O
prince Noor Muhammad! This is the time to come to my help,
For
you are my only sources of help in this world.”
(Shamaa'im-e-lmdaadiyah,
Page 83; and Imdaad -ul-Mushtaaq, Page 116 (Thanvi)
Ashraf
Ali Thanvi says:
‘(O
Prophet!) you are the one who reveals what is hidden in our heart."
“(O
prophet) you are the one who provides relief from difficulty to those
in need.”
(
Hayatul Muslimeen,page 9 )
See
the scans : here
It
is sufficient for the readers to see that how these deobandis have
praised their scholars but
when the similar words are used for the Holy Prophet
(s), these wahabis do
not hesitate to call Muslims as mushriks!
---
---
Back
to the ^deobandi mufti
who said:
“a)
This Salawat should not be considered to be specifically established
through the Sunna, neither should it be considered superior to other
forms of Salawat that are established and narrated from the Messenger
of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace).
I
am sure that this Deobandi
Mufti knows
that except Darud
e Ibrahimi,
no other darud is authentically related from Prophet with
a sahih chain of narration.
Then
why is that this Mufti is
making this point which is irrelevant at this point?
The answer
is clear! This Mufti is
making a foundation to justify the claim of his “sect”!
Even
if this Darud is considered to be established through the Sunna
(which is not), how will this belief constitute shirk?
Does
this Deobandi Mufti know
what is shirk?
If
a layman considers a mawdu narration to be from prophet, will
it make him mushrik???
The
answer is clear! No
one has ever said that this darud has been established though the
Sunna ,Just like Qasida
Burdah
This Deobandi
Mufti wanted to call Sunni
Muslims as mushrik ,
that is why he wrote this belief of his sect !
The
second claim by the Deobandi Mufti:
“One
should avoid attaching benefits of reciting this Salawat that are
connected to the hereafter. However,
there is nothing wrong in mentioning the many worldly benefits of
reciting it, as they are based upon experience. “
By
making this claim, the living
Mufti has unknowingly hurt the claim of his
“Imam e Rabbani” of the
deobandis, Shaykh Rashid Gangohi!
Rashid
Ahmad Gangohi said,
“Whatever
excellence is attributed to Durood-e-Taj by the ignorant (jahil) is
absolutely wrong”.
Rashid
Gangohi “only the ignorant
attribute the excellence to Darood Taj.
And
this living Deobandi mufti says,
“there
is nothing wrong in mentioning the many worldly benefits of reciting
it, as they are based upon experience.”
Can
this Deobandi
Mufti tell
us, who had
this experience of worldly benefits?
If
these were ignorant (Jahil), then how can we base our ruling on
experience of these ignorant?
Did
these ignorant Muslim inform him that they are not getting any
benefit after they are dead.?
Did
they come back after being buried ?
Note it
a part of Deobandi belief that prophet
cannot help us or move from his blessed resting place , but the
deobandi scholars can do so . see
scans: Here
How
does this living Deobandi
mufti come to know that there
is ONLY wordly benefits from
reciting Darud Taj?
How
is he sure that there is no
reward/ benefit after this life?
Why
is he not mentioning these hadith:
“Recite Durood on me in abundance on Fridays, for
Durood is presented to me (on Fridays)”
(Abu
Dawood, Nisai, Ibni Majah and Ibni Hibban)
“Allah bestows ten measures of mercy to the one who
recites Durood on me; ten of his sins are forgiven; he is elevated ten ranks
and ten virteous deeds are written in his Book of Deeds” (Nasai and Tibrani)
Imam
Mustaghfiri
narrates that Rasulullah (sal allahu alayhi wa sallam) said :
"Whoever recites 100 times Durood on me daily, 100 of his
needs will be fullfilled - 30 worldly needs and 70 pertaining to the
Akhirah."
And
Darud Taj begins with:
“O Allah, send blessings and Peace upon our Master and Patron
Muhammad, The Owner of the Crown……..”
Deobandis hidden hatred for the Holy Prophet(صلى الله عليه وسلم) can be seen in the writing of this deobandi
mufti:
The Deobandi Mufti then writes:
“ The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace)
must be considered a “means” of removing afflictions, sicknesses,
droughts and the like, whilst Allah Most High must be regarded the absolute
remover of all pains and calamities.”
The
Imam of the wahabis
in India, Ismail Dehalvi said that even if the belief is that prophet or anyone else
is a "means" ., it will still constitute SHIRK ! [ Tafwiyatul
Iman]
So
if this Deobandi mufti considers prophet ( sal allahu alayhi wa sallam) to be a
"means" he still commits shirk as per the fatwa of his wahabi
imam!!!
Muslims
have nothing to do with this wahabi fatwa
But
which Muslim in the world thinks that Anyone except Allah has absolute
power over anything?
Why is he bent on proving that all the Muslims are mushrik and do not know this fact?
Why is he bent on proving that all the Muslims are mushrik and do not know this fact?
Does
he not know that all the Muslims know that Allah has absolute knowledge,
control and authority over everything. Allah bestows this upon
anyone whom HE wishes.
Let’s
look at the hadith of Black seed as found in Sahih of Imam Bukhari
Narrated
Aisha
(RA) that she heard the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
saying, "The black cumin is healing for all
diseases except As-Sam." Aisha (RAA) asked "What is As-Sam?" He
(SAW) said, "Death."
Does
this deobandi mufti think that the black
cumin has healing power in itself or Allah has given this in it?
The
Holy Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم) did not say “Allah has given shifa in black seed” rather the
Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم ) said: “ The black cumin is healing for all disease….”
Because it is known and understood by every Muslim that Allah
is the ultimate power for everything.
But
our learned mufti wanted to fulfill his desire of calling Muslims as mushrik and to prove his sect correct !
For
better understanding of this topic the learned mufti
should read:
Fatwa Khairiya.( Kitab al Iman )
We
seek refuge in Allah from these wahabis and pray to Allah to guide these
people on the right path. Ameen!
Proof
from Quran and Hadith
And Allah is not one to chastise them, till ('O beloved Prophet)
you are in their midst. And Allah is not to chastise them, whilst they are
begging forgiveness.
(Al Anfal , 33)
Here
Allah subhanahu wata’ala clearly says that He will not chastise these
wrong doer till our beloved prophet is between them . It means
prophet is the cause for these people not getting punished . Hence
he is definitely “One who repels calamities,” as found in Darud
Taj.
And We sent not you, but a mercy for all worlds. ( Al Anbiyaa, 107)
And
it is understood that being a mercy includes being a cause of
removing calamities.
And We have not sent any messenger, but that he should be
obeyed by Allah's will. And if when they do injustice unto their souls, then O
beloved! They should come to you and then beg forgiveness of Allah and the
messenger should intercede for them then surely, they would find Allah Most
Relenting, Merciful.
(An Nisaa, 64)
Allah has
full authority to forgive any one whom He wishes , But Lord of the entire
creation says that the sinners should have gone to prophet ( sal allahu
alayhi wa sallam) and requested him to pray for them.Getting ones sin forgiven
is definitely a great news as we will not get punished for these
sins in the hereafter . Which means the calamity get removed. Again it is Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
who was made a cause for forgiving these people. Hence Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
is definitely “One who repels calamities,”
as found in Darud Taj.
Those who were driven out from their homes without right only on
this pretext that they said, 'Our Lord is Allah. And if Allah had not removed
men one by means of other, then necessarily, the cloisters and churches and
synagogues and mosques wherein the name of Allah is mentioned much would have
been pulled down. And undoubtedly, Allah will necessarily help him who will
help His religion; verily Allah is necessarily, Powerful, Dominant ( Al Hajj , 40)
This
shows that through mujahidden difficulty and hardship is removed.
And if Allah would not repel some of them by some others among
people, then necessarily the earth, would have been ruined, but Allah is
Munificent to entire, world . (Al Baqara, 251)
The
commentators ( mufassireen) have said that due to Muslims the calamites
which are to come on evil doers is removed .
They are those who disbelieved and hindered you from the
Sacred mosque, and the sacrificial animals were detained from reaching their
place of sacrifice. And if it had not been for certain believing men and some
believing women whom you knew not that you might have trampled them, and there
befall you any harm from them unknowingly, We would have permitted you to
fight. This protection of theirs is for that Allah may admit into His mercy
whom He pleases. If they had been separated, necessarily then We would have
punished the infidels among them with a painful punishment.
(Al
Fath, 25)
The
verse mentions the incidence before the victory of Makkah. When prophet went
for umra and the mushrikeen of the Makkah did not allow him to enter the city
of Makkah. Allah revealed this verse telling the wisdom behind not
enetering makkah this year. As it says clearly it was due to muslims that the
unbelievers were not given punishment.
Imam Bayhaqi has narrated a hadith in Shu`ab
al-Iman on the authority of Anas bin Malik[rd] that Prophet
(صلى الله عليه وسلم )
said that Allah azz wa jal says, “ When I
see those who visit my House ( masjid), those who love me and those who
are awake in the night asking for forgiveness , then I do not send afflictions
on land”.
Imam
Tabrani
in his Mu’jam al-Kabir and Imam Bayhaqi in his Sunan have
narrated a hadith on the authority of Rabia [rd] that Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم )
said “ had there not been worshippers
punctual in salah ( prayer) and infants and grazing animals ,
then Allah would have surely sent afflictions on you.
The
old name of Medina al Munawwara was “ Yathrib”
which is derived from the root word “tharb”
meaning “fasad’ ( wickedness). People used
to get high fever when they used to enter this city. When the companions of the
Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم) entered this city they
all fell ill. When Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
was informed about this , he made dua (supplication) and every one became well.
The
Prophet (صلى
الله عليه وسلم) then said, “the dust of the city of medina has cure
for leprosy”
[
Al wafa.; Imam Ibn Al Jawzi al Hanbali ]
This
is a clear proof that Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
was given the Authority of Removing Affliction.
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Darud Taj
O Allah, send blessings and Peace upon our Master and Patron
Muhammad,
The Owner of the Crown and the Ascent and the Buraq and the
Standard,
The Repeller of Affliction and Disease and Drought and Illness
and Pain.
His name is written on high, served and engraved in the Tablet
and the Pen,
The Leader of All, Arabs and non-Arabs,
Whose body is sanctified, fragrant, and pure,
Illumined in the House and the Haram,
The Sun of Brightness, the Full Moon in Darkness,
The Foremost One in the Highest Fields, the Light of Guidance,
The Cave of Refuge for Mortals, the Lamp That Dispels the Night,
The Best-Natured One, The Intercessor of Nations,
The Owner of Munificence and Generosity.
Allah is his Protector, Gabriel is his servant.
The Buraq is his mount, the Ascent is his voyage,
The Lote-Tree of the Furthermost Boundary is his station,
Two Bow-Lengths or Nearer is his desire,
His desire is his goal, and he has found his goal,
The Master of the Messengers, the Seal of the Prophets,
The intercessor of sinners, the friend of the strangers,
The Mercy for the Worlds,
The rest of those who burn with love, the goal of those who
yearn,
The sun of knowers, the lamp of travellers,
The light of Those Brought Near,
The friend of the poor and destitute,
The master of Humans and Jinn,
The Prophet of the Two Sanctuaries,
The Imam of the Two Qiblas,
Our Means in the Two Abodes,
The Owner of Qaba Qawsayn,
The Beloved of the Lord of the Two Easts and the Two Wests,
The grandfather of al-Hasan and al-Husayn,
Our patron and the patron of Humans and Jinn:
Abu al-Qasim MUHAMMAD Son of `Abd Allah,
A light from the light of Allah.
O you who yearn for the light of his beauty,
Send blessings and utmost greetings of peace
Upon him and upon his Family.
-------------------------------------------------
Also Read
“Is this durood shirk?
Is it shirk to recite this darood :
---
(Edited by ADHM)
