Why did the Deobandi
"akabir"
write
Al Muhannad
?
What is this Al Muhannad?
Quote:
"Al-Muhannad ala
al-Mufannad (The
Sword on the Disproved)
also known as al-Tasdiqat
li-Daf’ al-Talbisat (Endorsements
Repelling Deceits)
The book was first
published in the Subcontinent in the year 1325 A.H. (1907CE)"
Al Muhannd was written exclusively for Ahlus Sunnah scholars of Arab
to prove that the Deobandis are not Wahhabis!
Al Muhannd was written by Khaleel Ahmed Saharapuri
(d.1346AH /1927CE)
Who had only deceived people and did not write
those beliefs which were present in Deobandi books.
The Deobandis will give a list of scholars who signed Al Muhannad but they will shy away from
giving the comments of many scholars who signed.
Also, Deobandis should present the book in the
original form in which it was presented to the Arab scholars, that is,
in question and answer form, so that everyone can see the truth!
First let us see what Mawlana Rashid Ahmed Ganghoi
wrote in Fatwa Rashidiya on the issue of
Mawlid:
Quote:
“Those Mawlid gatherings which do not have any “
ghair shariah’ activity , even in those gathering as a matter of precaution ,
people should not join in present time . (Fatwa Rashidiya, Vol: 1, page:
48.)
Question: Is it permissible
to join in those Mawlid gatherings in which ONLY authentic narrations are read
out and no weak or fabricated narrations are read out?
Answer:
It is impressible to join in these gatherings due to other reasons.
(Fatwa Rashidiya,Vol: 2, p age:131.)
Mawlid gatherings are not permitted in any condition (Fatwa Rashidiya, Vol:2, page: 96.)
Question: Is it allowed to participate in those “urs”
gathering in which ONLY quran sheif is recited and sweet is distributed?
Answer: It is not allowed to join any
“urs” AND MAWLID gathering and all kind of “urs” and Mawlid are
impressible. (Fatwa Rashidiya, Vol:
3, page: 143.)
Rashid Ahmad Gangohi said: “Milad Sharif, Mairaj Sharif,
Urs Sharif, Soyam, Chehlum, Fatiha Khwani and Isal-e-Sawab all are unlawful,
wrong and method of Kuffar and Hindus.”
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Page:144-150,
Vol2, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1352 AH, 1933CE publication).
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Page:93-94, Vol3, Published by: Rahimia Kutb
Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1351 AH, (1932CE publication).
Deobandi deceptions in Al Muhannad
Having
read the above Fatwas, now let us see how Mawlana Khaleel
Ahmed twisted the facts in Al Muhannad
Note that the questions in Al Muhannad
were not asked by Arab scholars.
Mawlana Khaleel himself made questions and then
replied to clarify Deobandi standing on different issues:
Question No. 21 (Al Muhannad)
“ Do you say that Mawlid celeberations of prophet ( sal allahu alai hi wa
sallam) is not allowed as per shariah and it is ‘offending”( qabeeh) and biddah
and haram? Or do you say something else on this?
Now if Mawlana Khaleel Ahmed had been
a true Deobandi he
would have given this reply:
“ Yes , our founder Ismaeel Dehalvee has called all
these type of celeberation as Mushrikana act. Our Shaykh Rashid Ahmed
has called all types of Mawlid as impressible in his book/Fatwas, we have also said that Mawlid celeberatons are just like the hindu celebrating birth
of their “god” Krishna.” (Fatwa Rashidiya and in my Barahin-e-Qatia)
If Mawlana Khaleel would have written the
above ^answer, we know how many Ahlus Sunnah scholars would
have signed this Al Muhannad !
But Mawlana Khaleel was a wise man!
He knew that the Wahhabi fitna was spreading fast and all the Ahlus sunnah scholars were
united against refuting Wahhabis.
Before we read what Mawlana Khaleel Ahmed wrote in al Muhannad
Let us also note what
Allamah Anwar Shah Al-Kashmiri (d.1933CE)
has said regarding Mawlid :
وأحدثه صوفي في عهد سلطان إربل سنة ( 600 ) ، ولم يكن له أصل من الشريعة الغراء
العرف الشذي شرح سنن الترمذي - (2 / 82 مؤسسة ضحى للنشر والتوزيع)
“A sufi innovated it in the era of Sultan Irbil around the year 600 A.H, and it does not have any basis in our pure Shariah.”
Let us read the answer which Mawlana
Khaleel wrote:
( No.21)
Al Muhannad
“ No muslim will have any problem in celeberating
and discussing the birth of prophet. In fact no one can say that it is biddah
to discuss even the dust of the shoes of prophet or even to discuss the animal
on which prophet travelled. Discussing all those events and people who have
some relation with prophet is very pleasing and is considered ‘mustahab’ near
us. Whether it is the celeberation of his birth of discussing his life or his
dreams, all this is recommended near us.
So he wrote the answer as to please the Arab scholars of Ahlus sunnah!
A few lines later….
“ We are not against discussing the event of birth but we are against those
‘wrong’ things which have got mixed with these celebrations as you have seen in
the Indian celebration of Mawlid, they have mawdu( fabricated) narrations in
their gatherings. Men and women mingle in these gatherings, lightning and other
un necessary things cause wastage of money and they consider these gatherings
as ‘ wajib” and those who do not participate are criticized. Apart from all these,
there are other anti shariah acts present, from which no mawlid gathering is
free.”
This is just one “small lie” present in Al Muhannad !
No Sunni scholar ever called Mawlid as ‘Wajib’
and men and women never mingle in any Mawlid gathering. It is a big lie. Those
functions which are arranged at night , only men attend and other Mawlid
gatherings which are conducted in day time , has got lectures of Ahlus sunnah
scholars telling about the birth , life and noble character of prophet. Imagine
this lie, that during those days, more than 100 years back, as per Mawlana Khaleel, men
and women used to “mingle’!
Quote:
“
Question
Do you say that the commemoration of his (Allah
bless him and grant him peace) birth is deemed blameworthy (mustaqbah) in the Shari‘ah, from
the evil and prohibited innovations (al-bid‘at al-sayyi’ah al-muharramah), or [do you believe]
otherwise?
(Note: what Rashid Ahmed and Anwar Shah said above)
Answer
Far be it that any of the
Muslims say, let alone we, ourselves, say, that commemorating his noble birth (upon him
blessing and peace), rather even commemorating the dust on his shoes and the
urine of his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) camel, are deemed
blameworthy in the Shari‘ah, from the evil and prohibited innovations;
for, commemorating the states which have the least connection with the
Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is from the most
desirable of recommended acts (ahabb al-mandubat) and
the greatest of preferable acts (a‘la l-mustahabbat) according
to us, whether it is the commemoration of his noble birth or commemoration
of his urine, feces, standing, sitting, sleeping and waking as is stated
clearly in our treatise called Al-Barahin
al-Qati‘ah at various junctures therein, and in the fatwas of our teachers (mashayikh) (may
Allah have mercy on them), as [is mentioned, for example] in the fatwas of Mawlana Ahmad ‘Ali al-Muhaddith al-Saharanpuri, the student
of Shah Muhammad Ishaq al-Dahlawi then al-Muhajir al-Makki, which we will quote
in translation, that it may become an example of all [the other fatwas]:
He (may Allah have mercy on
him) was asked about the milad function,
in which manner is it permissible and in which manner is it impermissible?
He replied [saying] that:
Commemorating the noble birth of
our master, the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) using
sound narrations, during times devoid of the obligatory duties of worship, and
in forms not contravening the path of the Companions and the people of the
three generations whose greatness has been attested to, and [in forms not]
containing beliefs that may be conceived of as shirk and bid‘ah, and in
manners which do not contravene the conduct of the Companions which is the
measure of his (peace be upon him) statement, “What I and my Companions are
upon,” and in gatherings free from abominations of the Shari‘ah, is a cause for
goodness and blessing, with the condition that it is accompanied by pure
intention and sincerity and the belief that it is included within the totality
of recommended good remembrances (jumlat al-adhkar al-hasanah
al-mandubah), and is not restricted to a time from the times. When it is
so, we do not know of any Muslim who rules it to be unlawful (ghayr mashru‘) or bid‘ah.
To the end of the fatwa.
It is learnt from this that we do
not denounce the commemoration of his noble birth. Rather, we denounce the
abominable acts that are associated with it as you [may] have seen in the mawludi functions which [take place] in India, of
narrating weak and forged narrations, the mixing of men and women, extravagance
in lighting candles and decorations, and the belief that it is obligatory, by
vilifying, insulting and anathematising those who do not attend their function
with them, and other such abominations of the Shari‘ah which are almost not
found to be absent from them. If they were free of these abominations, far be
it that we say that commemorating the noble birth is abominable and a bid‘ah.
How can this ugly belief be suspected of a Muslim? Hence, this
attribution to us is also from the inventions of the deceptive lying deviants
(Allah Exalted is He disgrace them, and curse them on land and sea and on
smooth and rough land).[1]
Al-Muhannad ‘ala l-Mufannad
ya‘ni ‘Aqa’id ‘Ulama Ahl Sunnah Deoband, pp. 60-63 "
[End of Quote]
Those who are against Mawlid, they fabricate stories to label
Ahlus Sunnah
as ignorant.
One such booklet published by a Wahhabi group
in South Africa said that in India during mawlid celeberation a woman sits behind a
veil carrying a baby in her lap. And when she pinches the baby, the baby starts
crying and the “public” stand as a mark of respect symbolising the birth of
prophet.
This is such an ugly lie that whoever said this, he will be held accountable
on the day of judgement. They hate Ahlus sunnah so much that they can fabricate
any story to full fill their desire.
This was just one question (No.21)
from Al Muhannad.
All other answers have got big lies.
It is better to get the original copy of Al Muhannad and read it.
Compare the
answers given in Al Muhannad with
writings of Deobandi scholars present in other books.
Then you will see how many lies were written in Al Muhannad.
---
Now
Have a read what the deobandi "akabir" said:
Rashid Ahmad Gangohi states:
"The followers of Mohammad Ibne
Abdul Wahab are called Wahabis, their beliefs were excellent."
(FATAWA-E-RASHIDJA
- Vol. 1- Page 111)
and also here the deobandi Fatwa: 994/834=B-1429 which says:
"Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi رحمۃ اللہ علی)This great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the opponents attribute us to him for irritating us. It is useful to study the book ? Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab ke khilaf propaganda aur Hindustan ke Ulam-e- Haq per uske asaraat? written by Hadhrat Maulana Manzoor Nomani.”
But in
Al Muhannad , the official Deobandi Aqida
book which was signed by over 20 Deobandi “akabir” scholars state that they agree with view of Imam Ibn Abidin al Hanafi (Rh)
on Ibn Abd Al Wahab al Najdi as mentioned in Durrul Mukhtar.
Deobandi
showed this book to Sunni Aarb scholars and got their approval.
Wahhabis on the other hand do not accept
the view of Ibn Abidin al Hanafi (rh).
---
The Deobandis
are contradicting
their own Aqida book Al
Muhannad
Their “akabir” Ganagohi said that Ibn Abd al Wahab Najdi was
correct in aqida.
When deobandis wrote Al
Muhannad (to get it approved from Sunni Arab scholars) they did not
mention this point in that book. If deobandis would have accepted the aqida and
methodology of Ibn Abdal Wahab al Najdi , then Sunni Arab scholars would not
have signed Al Muhannad!
Now official
fatwa from Deoband has accepted
the aqida and approach of Ibn Abdal Wahab Njdi as correct. Here Deobandis are
going against their own book, Al Muhannad.
This
proves that Al Muhannad was written by Deobandis
only to get it signed by Sunni Aarb scholars.
VIEW OF DEOBANDI SCHOLARS ON
IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI
AL TAMIMI
Al-Muhannad, the book of beliefs of the
ulama of Deoband, on page 12, contains the following question and answer:
"Question number 12: Muhammad Ibne
Abdul Wahaab held the view that shedding the blood of Musalmaans and taking
away their property and defiling their honour, all these things were lawful. He
also termed them idolaters. He was insolent towards the elders. What is your
view of him? And do you (think calling the Ahle Qiblah as infidels is a lawful
act? Or do you think that he who does these things belongs to a legitimate
sect?
Answer: In our view (Please note: OUR
VIEW (not My view) and Al Muhanned
was signed by leading scholars of deoband school of thought) the same verdict applies to them as has been given by the writer of
Durr-e-Mukhtaar. And Khawarij are a band of people who waged war against the
Imam because they thought him to be guilty of falsehood, that is, idolatry,
which justified waging war. For this reason they take the taking of our lives
and our property and making our women captives to be lawful. He further held
that they were rebels. He also held that they did not Describe them as infidels
because this was a matter of interpretation, though a faulty one. And Allamah
Shaami, in his marginal notes on the book, has said, "Like it happened in
our times when the followers of Ibne Abdul Wahaab sallying forth from Najd
overwhelmed Haramain Shareefain. They described themselves as belonging to Hambali
creed, but it was their belief that only they were Musalmaans and whoever was
against their belief was an idolater and, so, they justified the killing of the
Ahle Sunnat and the ulama of the Ahle Sunnat until Almighty Allah deprived them
of their ascendancy."
Hussein Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says: "Gentlemen' Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab appeared in
the Najd in the 13th century A.H., and, because he harboured evil thoughts and
held wrong beliefs, he waged war on the Ahl-e-Sunnat Wall Jama'at, sought to
force his evil thoughts upon them and considered lawful seizing of their
properties as the spoils of war, and killing them, and considered all these
acts to bring blessings. He was harsh on the people of the Haramain (Makkah and
Madinah) in particular and on the people of the Hijaaz in general. He used most
foul language against the pious men of the earlier generations. Because of the
atrocities committed by him on them, countless people had to flee the holy
cities of Makkah and Madinah, and many of them were martyred by his troops. In
short, he was a tyrant, a rebel and an altogether evil person."
(Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib, Page 42)
"Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab believed that people all
over the world and all Muslims were polytheists and infidels. (Page 44)
The Najdis believed, and his followers still
believe, that the lives of Prophets (Alihumus Salaam) were limited to the times
during which they lived upon this earth. Thereafter, in death, they and other
faithfuls are equal. (Page 45)
This group holds that having a vision of the blessed
Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and visits to his blessed tomb are bad
innovations and unlawful. He also holds as unlawful even journeying in that
direction for this purpose. According to some of them, even journeying for the
sake of paying a visit to the blessed tomb is like committing fornication. May
Allah save us from such evil thoughts! (Page 45)
The Wahaabis use most insolent language in respect
of Prophethood and the person of the holy Prophet himself (Sallal Laahu Alaihi
Wasallam) and, in their insolence, claim to be the equals of the personality of
the holy Prophet, and, according to them, only a little benefit accrued from
him during the times he was preaching the Messages of Allah, and no benefits
flowed from him after his passing away. And because they think so, they
consider as unlawful praying for Allah's forgiveness through his intercession.
Their elders also said that praying for Allah's forgiveness through his
intercession was unlawful. (May Allah save us from having such thoughts)! But,
perhaps, it may be permissible to reproduce such thoughts, for merely
reproducing blaspheming words does not by itself constitute blasphemy). They
also said that the staff in a man's hand was of greater advantage to him than
the glorious personality of the king of the universe (Sallal Laahu Alaihi
Wasallam), for with a staff in his hand one can defend himself from a dog while
the personality of the pride of the universe (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam)
cannot do even this much for him. (Page 47)
The Wahaabis are against performing mystic rites
and sophistic practices-meditating, engaging in the remembrance of Allah and
thinking about Him, owing allegiance to spiritual guides and the whole system
of spiritual guides, and having a mental rapport with the spiritual guides,
believing in the doctrine of annihilation and permanent life etc. etc In their
view, al' such things are of no consequence, bad innovations and demeaning.
(Page 59, Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib)
In Wahaabi belief, following any particular Imam is
considered to be blasphemy against the Prophet, and they use wretched and
wicked words for the four Imams and their followers, and thus they are
alienated from the Ahl-e-Sunnat-Wa-Jama'at and so the non-emulators of India
belong to this wicked group. While they claimed to be Hanbalee when they first
appeared on the scene, but in many matters they do not follow Imam Ahmad Bin
Hanbal (Alaihir Rahmah) (Page 62, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib).
Through verses Ar-Rahmaanu 'Alal 'Arshis Tawa etc,
the Wahaabis try to prove that Allah physically occupies a throne and also make
out His dimensions and, therefore, His bodily presence.
(Page 24, Ash-Shahaabus-Saaqib)
The Wahaabis of Arabia have often been heard to
harshly denounce the expression, "As Salaatu was Salaamu Alaika ya
Rasoolal Laah" (Peace and salutation to you, O Allah's Messenger)",
and most scathingly condemn and ridicule its use, and hurl most unbecoming
language against the people of the Haramain who use such an expression.(Page
65, Ash-Shahaabus-Saaqib)
The wicked Wahaabis harshly denounce sending
repeatedly peace and salutation on the mercy to the worlds, and consider
reciting Dalaa'ilul Khairuat, Qaseedah Burdah and Qassedah Hamziyah and such
like as most detestable and unwarranted. They also consider some couplets of
Qaseedah Burdah to be downright blasphemous, as for example the couplet:
Ya Ashrafal Khalqi Maali Man Aloozu Bihi Siwaaka Inda Huloolil Haadisil 'Amami
(O. the best of creations! I have no one To look up to in perilous times like
these)
(Page 66, Ash Shahaabus Saaqib)
Except for the knowledge by him of Allah's commands, the Wahaabis think the
personality of the Last of the Prophets (Alaihis Salaatu Was Salaam) to be
devoid of all hidden and true knowledge.
(Page 62, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib)
The Wahaabis consider the narration of the birth of the king of the universe
(Alaihis-Salaatu-Was-Salaam) itself to be a most reprehensible act and a very
bad innovation".
(Page 67, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib)
Anwar Shah Kashmiri writes in Fayd al Bari , Vol 1 "Muhammad ibn `Abd al Wahab
Najdi, and indeed he was a stupid man with little knowledge."
Compare ^ this with the fatwa
from Deoband !
SEE MORE DEOBANDI LOVE FOR WAHABIS
BUT KEEP IN MIND !
WHAT THEY SAID IN AL MUHANNAD
THEY SAID TO THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS THAT:
WE HATE WAHABIS AND CONSIDER IBN
ABDAL WAHAB AND WAHABIS AS MISGUIDED AND KHAWARIJ
1. This title
(Wahaabi) means a person who subscribes to, or is subservient, to the creed of
Ibne Abdul Wahaab". (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa), Page 233.
2.
On Page 45 of Ashrafus Sawaanih, it is stated thus: "A story is narrated of the times when Ashraf Ali Thanvi
Sahib was a teacher at the Madrasah Jaamiul-Uloom, Kanpur. Some women living in
the neighbourhood of the Madrasah brought some sweets so that the Holy Qur'aan
may be recited and the reward so earned be conveyed. Students of the Madrasah
did not do so and ate up the sweets. This created quite a row. When informed of
the row, Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, "Brethren!
This place is populated by Wahaabis. Don't bring anything here for the sake of
faatihah and niyaaz."
3.
One Page 192 of the biography of Janab Yoosuf Kandhalvi, it is stated that 'we are staunch Wahaabis."
4.
One of the elders of the Deobandi Wahaabi propagandist group, Sheikh-ul-Hadees
Muhammad Zakariya Sahib, declares: "I
am a more staunch Wahaabi than all of you." (Biography of Maulana Muhammad Yoosuf
Kandhalvi, Page 193, authored by Muhammad Saani Hasni and Manzoor Nu'maani).
5. "If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it and people would have
automatically become WAHABI"- Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvee ( Al ifadatul Yaumiya)
Scan:
and now:
click on ^image to Enlarge
The View of a Living Deobandi Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi and Wahhabis
Question
11949 from United States:
Q:
Can you please explain who are Wahabies (is this a sect), are they also Ahlus
Sunnah Wal Jammah
I
really would like to know who Wahabies are and what they believe in. I'am
hanafi and was wondering what is the difference between us and them.
Jazzakallahairun selam
Answer 11949:
The Wahabis, who call themselves
Salafis, are a group who had appeared in the last few centuries and hold
beliefs contrary to the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa'ah.
They try to pull the wool over our eyes by affiliating themselves with the
Salaf (Sahabah and Tabi'en) but in effect their beliefs and practices are
completely in contradictory with those of the Salaf.
The Wahabis are in essence Mujassimah (anthropomorphists-Those who attribute
a body to Allah Ta'ala).
They attribute a hand, leg, face etc to Allah Ta'ala, while the illustrious
Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jama'ah hold fast to the belief that Allah knows
best the meaning of these words.
Similar is the case with all the sifat (qualities) etc in the Quran ie. the
Wahabis take them on there apparent meaning , claiming that interpreting the
Quran is not permissible, while we say that Allah knows best what it means or
at times we interpret it in a suitable manner.
-The Wahabis reject the permissibility of using a deceased person as a
intermediary in dua, while we hold that it is permissible.
-The Wahabis reject the Ambiyaa being alive in their graves
- The Wahabis hold that Allah is really resting on His throne in the sky, while
we hold that this is from the Mutashabihaat.(Those unclear statements hose
meaning is only known to Allah).
- The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah disagree with the destruction of
numerous blessed historical landmarks by the Wahabis.
-The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah hold that taqleed of one mazhab is
necessary, while the Wahabis generally do not adhere to a mazhab and claim that
following one imam blindly is Bidah and shirk.
-There are dozens of other differences.
The Wahabis are vehement opponents of the Asharis and Maaturidis, who
constitute the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and are two groups whose beliefs are
correct. They also vehemently oppose tawassuf.
It is necessary for us to be on our guard against them as they are very active
propagators of their Baatil and false beliefs.
Mufti Ebrahim Desai
But hold on...
Question:
What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab? Do you agree that
the present form of wahhbism has nothing to do with teachings of Maulana Abdul
Wahhab?
Answer:
Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab
[ra] was a reputable and God-fearing Aalim of the eighteenth century aligned to
the Hanbali Madhab. Sheikh enjoyed unique acceptance and love across the
spectrum of social class. Sheikh, in conjunction with the royal family of the
time, was responsible for rekindling the love for the Qur’aan and Sunnah in the
populace of the Arabian peninsula.
Unfortunately, subsequent to the death of
the Sheikh, his opponents embarked on a vehement campaign of concocting
erroneous beliefs and views and attributed them to the Sheikh. This, in an
attempt to discredit the Sheikh and to bring about discord between his
followers.
When these attempts failed miserably, these
opponents rescinded and capitalized on the influence that Sheikh’s name enjoyed
and the love of the masses. By hijacking his movement and using it as a vehicle
to spread their incorrect views and beliefs. For more information, refer to
‘The Life of Shaykh Abdul Wahhaab’ by Sheykh Muhammad Abu Bakr Ghazipuri.
and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best
Mufti Ebrahim Desai
Read: Here
Note:
The " Deobandi Tactical Shift"?
The official book of Deobandis states that these
deobandis have the same belief about Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi which is mentioned
in Durrul Mukhtar!
By giving this lie, these Deobandi liars
managed a Fatwa from Sunni Arab scholars of Arabia ?
Now this Deobandi mufti was asked:
What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana
Abdul Wahhab?
So let this be known that this deobandi mufti is not only giving his views but
also the official view of Deobandis !
But this is totally against the official view in AL
MUHANNAD !
AL MUHANNAD says ibn abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis
and this mufti of
deobandis says that ibn abdul wahab was
a good man !
This is called policy of appeasement!
The
Deobandi mufti is smart to praise ibn abdul wahab najdi
, but he criticizes wahhabis !
THIS
IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL MUHANNAD WAS
WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS!
Conclusion:
When deobandis meet wahhabis they quote Mufti Ebrahim
Desai and current fatwa from deoband. Hence they prove that they are
supporters and followers of Ibn Abdal Wahab al Najdi .
When deobandis meet Sunni scholars from outside subcontinent , they
quote Al Muhannad.
Hence they prove that they are also sunni!
VIEW OF RASHID GANGOHEE ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI
AND DEOBANDI JUSTIFICATION
Rashid Gangohee was asked :
Question: What kind of a person was
(Muhammad ibn) Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi?”
“Answer: People
call Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab a Wahhabi. He was a good person, and I have heard that he was a follower of the
Hanbali School of Islamic law and acted upon the Hadith. He used to prevent
people from Shirk and innovation (bid’a), but he was harsh (shadid) in his
attitude.”
Please
Note: “I have heard”
THE
DEOBANDI JUSTIFICTAION
Read this Justification by a Deobandi
Wherein they are trying to prove that, their Shaykh
Gangohee had this view because it was based on information which he got ( I
HAVE HEARD). Later in this justification it has been tried to prove that
“Shaykh Gangohee would
have changed his view, had he known the fact!
Read
carefully
The Deobandi Justification says:
" Mufti Mahmud al-Hasan al-Gangohi (Allah have mercy on him) states in his
Fatawa that, Shaykh Rashid Ahmad (Allah have mercy on him) was initially
unaware of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi’s position, because al-Najdi was
initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and the one who
strived greatly in rejecting Bid’a and establishing the Sunnah. As such, the
respected Shaykh also said what he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold
good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven otherwise. "
The
Deobandi Justification continues...
" Thereafter,
the respected Shaykh’s mentor and teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar
wherein Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) clearly refuted Muhammad
ibn Abd al- Wahhab. Allama Ibn Abidin states:
“…As it has occurred in our times with the followers of Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi,
who appeared from Najd and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams.
They used to attribute themselves to the Hanbali School but they believed that
only they were Muslims and that whoever opposed their beliefs were polytheists
(mushrik), thus theyconsidered the killing of those who were from the Ahl
al-Sunnah and their scholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed
their might and power.”
(Radd
al-Muhtar, 3/339-340, chapter regarding the followers of Abd
al-Wahhab, the Khawarij of our times)
And also
"had Shaykh Rashid Ahmad read what Allama Ibn Abidin stated in his Radd
al-Muhtar regarding the Wahhabis, he would surely not have stated what he had
in his Fatawa"
Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on
him) was geographically closer to Najd, thus he was aware at first hand of what
Shaykh Rashid Ahmad, who was living in India, was unaware of. (See: Fatawa Mahmudiyya, 13/411-412)
ANALYSIS
As per this Deobandi Justification, "IF"
shaykh Gangohee would have had access to the Book
Durrul Mukhtar ( shami) then he might have not had this GOOD VIEW about Ibn
Abdul Wahab!
How ever, this justification also mentions that later Haji Imdadullah
(rh ) sent this book to Shaykh
Gangohee! So when shaykh Gnagohee got this book ,
Why did he not change his views about Ibn Abdul
Wahab Najdi ?
And the deobandi books are a witness to this fact
that Gangohee became an expert in
this book Raddul
Muhtar!
This has
been stated in many deobandi books that shaykh
Gnagohee was an expert on Raddul Muhtar and used to issue Fatwa based
on this book!
Read
this incidence which is mentioned in both Tazkiratur
Rashid and Arwahe Salasa !
Quote:
" It
states:
" Hazrat Gangohi ( Rashid ahmed) asked his student Mawlana Mohammed Yahya
sahib Kandhalvee to look for some ruling in the book Shami . Mawlana Yahya replied that
the particular ruling is not present in the book". Hazrat Gangho said how
can this be possible? Bring the book to me. The book was brought in front of
Hazrat (Rashid Ahmed gangohi).
At that time hazrat ( Rashid ahmed) had already lost his eye sight. He took the
book and turned two-third of the pages to the right and one third to the left
and opened a page and said " look on the bottom side of left page" .
It was found that the ruling was very much present there. Everyone was amazed.
Hazrat ( Rashid ahmed ) said " Allah has promised me that he will not let
anything wrong come come out of my tongue" ( Arwahe salasa, page
292)
Can we see? Even when Gangohee was
Blind he could locate a particular matter mentioned in that book! It means he
must have read that book so many times!
But
Gangohee did not change his view about Ibn
Abdul Wahab Najdi al Tamimi
CONCLUSION
1.From
this it can be derived that holding all Ahl-e-Sunnat to be polytheists and
killing them was lawful and permitted in the eyes of Gangohi Sahib. He also
says that the followers of (Ibne Abdul Wahaab) are good men, while all other
ulama of Deoband hold them to be Kharijis and rebels. It, thus, becomes clear
that Gangohi Sahib believes that Kharijis and rebels are good men.
2.
Gangohi Sahib says that their beliefs are excellent and he and his followers
are good men, while Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says that his views were
evil and his beliefs were most wretched. He considered the
killing of Ahle-Sunnat as an act, which brought blessings, and justified taking
away of their properties as spoils of war and, as such, lawful. He put the
people of the Haramain and the Hijaaz to great hardships until they were forced
to flee. He was most insolent towards the pious men of the earlier generations.
He was guilty of killing thousands of Musalmaans, and was tyrannical,
rebellious, blood-thirsty, and sinful.
3.
Now, if Gangohi Sahib is speaking the
truth, then Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni
is speaking the lie. Only one of two can be in the right. Now, a decision
about them rests on the followers of the two men.
4. Gangohi Sahib says that their
(Najdis) beliefs are excellent. How excellent can be seen in the writings of
the Principal of Deoband, Husain Ahmad Sahib t Tandvi Madni, who has listed,
serially, examples of the beliefs of the Najdis in his book, Ash Shahaubus
Saaqib! ( As quoted earlier)
THE
WORST PART OF THE WHOLE SITUATION IS THIS:
Darul
Uloom Deoband has issued this fatwa regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi
Quote:
"Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer
and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ). This
great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the opponents attribute
us to him for irritating us. It is useful to study the book ?Muhammad ibn Abdul
Wahab ke khilaf propaganda aur Hindustan ke Ulam-e- Haq per uske asaraat?
written by Hadhrat Maulana Manzoor Nomani. "
Here
So the official Darul Uloom Deoband has now accepted that they love Ibn Abdul Wahab
Najdi and his Aqida was ' sound" . This has also been accepted by a living
Deobandi Mufti!
The deobandis are pleasing wahhabis and
deceiving Sunni Muslim population!
Many living Deobandi scholars have adopted the policy of appeasement in this
modern time. Going totally against their Official aqida Book Al Muhannad they have praised Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi and called him a man with correct aqida!
In order to continue deceiving the Muslims of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah , they
have criticised the “wahhabis" in general and have said that wahhabis have anthropomorphic
belief.
Why did they not issue this fatwa in Al Muhannad?
Why did deobandi “akabir”
hide their aqida when Al Muhannad was presented to Sunni Arab scholars?
Now official Deobandi fatwa is
totally against official deobandi aqida as mentioned in ALMUHANNAD!
If Deobandis would have given their fatwa in support of Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi in
their book AL MUHANNAD, NO Sunni Arab
scholars would have signed this book!
So it is
again proved that AL MUHANNAD was written by
Deobandis to FOOL the Sunni Arab scholars.
The scholars of Ahlus sunnah have always told that AL
MUHANNAD is not against Hussamul
Harmayn as the confused deobandis claim.
The Deobandis firmly follow
the golden rule:
“If you
cannot convince someone, confuse them”
With Al
Muhannad
Note
after al Muhannad which according to deobandis was
written in 1907CE we read in Barahin-e-Qatia from the 1945CE edition that:
Khaleel Ahmed Ambethvi said: “Celebrating Milad-un-Nabi is
similar to that of Hindu's celebration on birth of their "Kanhia".”
Ref: Barahin-e-Qatia (Page: 148, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia
Saharanpur in1365 AH (1945CE publication).
Maulana Khalil
Ahmad Anbethawi Saharanpuri wrote: “Baraheen-e-Qati’ah” which was endorsed by Maulana
Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi this book was written in 1303 AH (1885 C.E.) and there was great displeasure to it. Read here
---
Imam Ahmad Raza (ra) in fact dedicated himself to wage war against these popular heresies and presented a powerful defence of true Islam. In 1905 A.D
Imam Ahmad Raza (ra) visited Holy places in Hejaz for performing pilgrimage. During this period he prepared a draft document entitled:
Al Motamad Al Mustanad (The Reliable Proofs):
for presentation to the eminent Ulamas of Mecca and Madina.
Imam Ahmad Raza (ra) collected scholarly opinions of the Ulama of Hejaz and compiled them in a compendium written in Arabic language with the title:
Husam al Harmain (The Sword of two sanctuaries):
Imam Ahmad Raza Khan (ra) passed away in 1921CE
--
Update: Nov 2018
The
Muhannad Deceit
Download/Read: Here
Brief
Content :
Quote:
-Denying
the finality of prophethood-p,4
-Satan
more knowledgeable than RasulAllah-p,5
-Comparing
the knowledge of RasulAllah صلى الله عليه وسلم with
lowly beings-p,6
Hifz
al-Iman-p,7
al-Mu'tamad
al-Mustanad-p,8
Tamhid-e-Iman-p,8
The
scholars of Makkah and Madinah -p,9
268
scholars of India and Pakistan-p,9
al-Sawarim
al-Hindiyyah-p9
al-Muhannad,
al-Shihab al-Thaqib and Bara'at al-Abrar-p,9
Sham’a
Munawwar Rah-e-Najat-p,9
616
Deobandi scholars –p,10
Mawlana
Hashmat Ali-p,10
Husam
al-Haramayn-p,10
-The
seals of approval in al-Muhannad-p,13
-The
appalling reality of al-Muhannad-p,14
-The
deceptive attempt of al-Muhannad-p,14
The
names of the Deobandi attesters to al-Muhannad-p,14
-There
is not a single reliable seal in al-Muhannad from the Haramayn-p,15
-The
lies and deceit of al-Muhannad-p,16
-A
simple conclusion-p,17
-Why
did Anbethwi do this?-p19
-Deobandi
alterations of passages and books-p,20
al-Shihab
al-Thaqib-p,20
Husain
Ahmad Madani presented bogus explanations of the passages of Tahdhir al-Nas-p,20
Hifz
al-Iman, it was originally a 10 page booklet-p,20
Hifz
al-Iman published by Anjuman Irshad al-Muslimin in Lahore is119 pages.-p,20
Thanwi
changed the passage but did not have the ability to make repentance-p,20
Molwi
Manzur Sanbhali-p,22
Another
myth that the Deobandis repeat-p,22
The
passage of Thanwi-p,23
Mawlana
Abdul Haq Muhajir Ilahabadi-p,24
Mawlana
Ali bin Husayn Maliki-p,25
Mawlana
Sayyid Ahmad Jaza’iri, the Shaykh of Malikis in Madinah-p,25
-The
mutual takfir of the Deobandis-p,29
-Manzur
Ahmad Nu’mani vs. Husain Ahmad Madani-p,30
----------------------------------
--------------------------------
---
ADHM
+also+known+as+al-Tasdiqat+li-Daf%E2%80%99+al-Talbisat.jpg)
,+are+they+also+Ahlus+Sunnah+Wal+Jammah.png)
