Imam Ibn Hajr (ra) calls the aqeedah that is associated to the Salafis of today as the Aqeedah of the Mushabbiha, who were a deviant sect and were refuted and rejected by the scholars of Ahlulsunnah. Today, the Salafi sect is a revival of those same beliefs, as seen in the video presentation here.
Imam Ibn Hajr (ra) says:
"Far greater is Allah than their opinion."
---
Orthodox and traditional Islamic knowledge is being lost.
The Prophet ﷺ said Islam will return to being something strange.
We are supposed to follow the Qur’an & Sunnah on the understanding of the Salaf ul-Saalih.
As new ideas are introduced and ignorance becomes prevalent, the original and correctunderstanding of Islamis becoming estranged.
Return to the Qur’an & Sunnah as the scholars have understood them.
---
From following the Quran & Sunnah, to the Salaf, to the history of the Ummah, to who Ash'aris really are, to what the Salafi sect actually believes- this lengthy but detailed video presentation critically details every aspect, and demonstrates why it is incumbent upon every Muslim to follow traditional and authentic sources when seeking knowledge, and to stay away from the Salafi sect when it comes to studying Aqeedah, as this field is the most important aspect of Islam.
Remember that the Prophet ﷺ said that at the end of times, the people will be misguided by those who have beautiful speech.
A person speaking well and beautifully, no matter how many Hadith he memorized, does not make him knowledgeable in every field of study in Islam. BE CAREFUL who you take your deen from. READ BIOGRAPHIES of speakers online. DON'T TRUST someone because he says some Arabic words! REMEMBER THAT the deen does not come easy, and true knowledge must be sought out by a person. ---
In the above video Umar explains the Hadith regarding Allah's 'descent', and why it wasn't to be taken literally according to Ahlulsunnah, what the interpreted understanding is, what the Hanbali and Ash'ari madhab said, and what the Salaf said in regard to leaving it alone without interpretation but while rejecting the literal. ---
https://www.youtube.com/@UmarElhashmi/featured
-----------------------------
Ustaadh Umar AbdulAziz
Ustaadh Umar began his Islamic studies as a junior in high school, where he enrolled in the traditional Darul Uloom dars-e-nizami Islamic education program. He completed the first year curriculum online with scholars from South Africa and Morocco, marking this as his introduction to the higher Islamic sciences (Sharia). He then transferred and studied in the well-known Darul Uloom Canada where he spent the year in the focus of predominantly the Arabic language with introductions to fiqh, hadith, and other sacred sciences. The following year he moved back to the US where he transferred to the Islamic Institute of Atlanta, GA, where the focus was on the depths of Arabic linguistics and rhetoric, fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) in the Hanafi madhab, comparative fiqh (differences of opinion within jurisprudential issues), hadith studies and memorization, Islamic history, and many other subjects.
In the years 2019 and 2020, Umar completed higher studies in the Tafsir of the first 10 juz of the Holy Qur'an and a beginner text in the Maliki fiqh. In 2021, he moved to Istanbul, Turkey to pursue specialized studies in the Islamic Sciences, completing the first year of the phD program in Sharia, with a specialization in Usool (principles) of Fiqh and Hadith, and Aqeedah (Islamic Philosophy).
He is currently studying under prominent Syrian Scholars, including Shaykh Mujeer al-Khateeb, Shaykh Khalid Kharsa, Shaykh Nader Abu Umar, Sheikh Ahmad al-Fadil, and many others with a chain of transmission directly through the well known scholar of Syria, Shaykh AbdulRazzaq al-Halabi.
Ustaadh has a deep love for the subject of Aqeedah and has received permission from his teacher to teach this subject. Umar continues as a formal student of knowledge under prominent Syrian scholars in Turkey, as he works toward receiving his phD and ijazah (formal qualification and license) in the Islamic sciences.
Quote Wahabi/Salafi: "I
was a so-called "Madkhali"
Salafi.
I
was "down" with SPUBS and TROID and
those people.
We
did not even consider the "Sururis" and "Ma'ribis"
and "Jihadis" Salafis.
They were labelled Hizbis, Qutbis and
Kharijis and part of Ahl-ul-Bid'a."
Another Wahhabi said: "Ok
I'm seriously confusednow after hearing all these
different types of Salafise.g. Madkali
Salafis, Saudi Salafis, Jihadi Salafis, Qutubis, Sururis, Modernist
Salafis, Murji Salafis, Talafis,etc, etc, etc,..."
?
---
What
is this "Salafi,Salafi & Salafi"?
Salafism was
re-introduced in the Arab world during
the late 1800s-
early 1900s by the reform
movement centered around the Egyptian: Mu-hammed
`Abduh(1849-1905)
Although
in theological matters,Abduh was
closer to the Mu'tazili school
of thought; he did adopt from Ibn
Taymiya, the latter's position against extreme forms of
taqlid and call for ijtihad. Abduh's studentRashid
Rida, the publisher of the influential journal:
Al-Manar was
closer in thought in his later years to the doctrines espoused by Ibn
Taymiyyah.
Like
most Egyptians of that time, Hasan
al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim
Brotherhood movement, was influenced by
the ideas of Abduh andRida, as
well as traditional Islamic doctrine as practiced in Egypt.
Hence
the Muslim Brotherhood had elements of Salafi
doctrine incorporated with it.
During
the same period, Ibn Taymiya's teachings
were revived in Syria by: al-Qasimi and
in Iraq by al-Alusi.
Salafismin
the Arab World after 1967
The
contemporary Islamic revival in the Arab world began to take shape
following the Arab defeat in the 1967 war
against Israel. At this time, there were two
main Salafi trends which
slowly began to merge: The
traditional Wahhabis found in Saudi Arabia centered
around:
Ibn
Humaid, Ibn Baz, and eventually Ibn
Uthaymin
... others
were represented by the Syrian based scholar
Al-Albani.
The
main difference between these trands lies in the close
identification of theWahhabis with
the Hanbali legal school and the Wahhabi
Salafis insistence on avoiding any legal school. In
this position they identified more closely with the 19th
century, Yemeni scholar ash-Shawkani and
his Indian student Siddiq
Hasan Khan.
After
the 1991 Gulf War, three new
identifiable trends of Salafism came
to the forefront.
The
anti-political pro-Saudi
government trend which identifies itself primarily with Saudi
scholar:
Rabi'
al-Madkhali.
The
political and mildly anti-Saudi
government trend which identifies itself with scholars like:
Safar
Al-Hawali.
The
various jihadist Salafi groups.
Each
trend accuses the other of straying from "true" Salafism.
The first two groups also argue between themselves that their
positions are closer to those of
Ibn
Baz and Al-Albani.
The
jihadist Salafi groups condemn both the first and second
trends.
Wahabi/Salafi
Madhkhalis,
Qutubis, Ikhwanis, Jihadists...
so
many sects/cults division amongst them... but they insist on their
slogan
He
pointed at a few famous Salafi Scholars such as Shaikh
Salman Al Awda, Shaikh Safara al Hawali, Shaikh Saleh Al Munajjjid,
etc...
And said:
"They
were all deviants"
---
Falihsaid: "Shaykh
Rabee 'is a liar, a charlatan,
a wild beast, he
is such a dog that
bites, all innovators are with him, his account is good, it's over!"
Abdullah
Ibn Abdur-Rahman Ibn Jibrin said: "I read what
the Shaikh Rabee 'Al-Madkhalee wrote in his refutation
of Sayyid Qutb and found that it has issued judgments on
things that do not exist. For this reason the Shaykh Bakr Abu
Zayd, Alla can preserve it, has refuted. It's identical to the
unjustified attacks [Al-Madkhalee] in the Shaikh
Abdur-Rahman ['Abdul- Khaliq] and how [to twist his words so as]
to show errors that would render astray, while they two were friends
for a whole period and he never found such fault with him [by the
past]. And the eye sees every fault of the property as insignificant,
while the eye of hatred always finds [serious] defects. " (02/26/1417
AH)
TheSalafi Jihadi movement arose and declared that the regime had abandoned its Islamic legitimacy and thus was an
"apostate regime"
The Ikhwan:
Ikhwān,
(Arabic: Brethren), in Arabia, members of a religious and military
brotherhood that figured prominently in the unification of the
Arabian Peninsula under Ibn
Saūd (1912–30);
in modern Saudi
Arabia they constitute the National Guard. Ibn
Saūd began organizing the Ikhwān in 1912 with
hopes of making them a reliable and stable source of an elite army
corps. In order to break their traditional tribal allegiances and
feuds, the Ikhwān were settled in colonies known as hijrahs. These
settlements, established around desert oases to promote agricultural
reclamation of the land, further forced the Bedouin to
abandon their nomadic way of life. The hijrahs, whose populations
ranged from 10 to 10,000, offered tribesmen living quarters, mosques,
schools, agricultural equipment and instruction, and arms and
ammunition.
Most
important, religious teachers were brought in to instruct the Bedouin
in the fundamentalist precepts of Islām taught by the religious
reformer Ibn
Abd al-Wahhāb in
the 19th century. As
a result the Ikhwān became archtraditionalists.
By
1918 they were ready to enter Ibn Saūd’s elite army.
So
the Ikhwan was a movement of Bedouins turned
into desert warriors to spread Salafism,
yet they soon found themselves betrayed by Ibn
Sa'ud, who preferred political expediency to a complete
affirmation of these doctrines. Successive Sa'udi rulers have often
promoted the Salafis whenever their objectives were being served, but
this was often little more than lip-service.
Ibn
Saud took control of the Brotherhood and
in 1916 ordered all
his Bedouin tribes to emulate Artawiyah. They were given instructions
in Wahhabism with Ibn Saud as their king and Imam. The Ikhwan became
a fanatical fighting machine and on the 25th May 1919 had
a fearsome triumph over the much superior Hashemite force at Turaba,
sixty miles from Mecca. Even Ibn Saud feared for the lives of the
Meccans and had to disband the Ikhwan.
In
1924, a band of three thousand Ikhwan looted and burnt the
town of Taif, killing 300 three
hundred townsfolk. Not having seen mirrors before, they smashed all
that they could find. After the massacre
at Taif, Ibn Saud forbade
further looting and murder and by 1926, Jeddah, Mecca,
Medina and indeed most of Arabia fell, comparatively bloodlessly,
into Saudi hands.
Ibn
Saud no longer needed the Ikhwan.
The
crunch came when the Brotherhood attacked the Egyptian hajji
of 1926. Accompanying them was a noisy brass band
which offended the puritanical sensitivities of the Ikhwan. Ibn
Saud's response was to clear them out of the Holy Places back to
their desert settlements of which there were about one hundred by
now.
The
Ikhwan werenotpleased
with what Ibn Saud.
In January
1927 Ibn Saud had to confer with three thousand odd Ikhwan
with the ulama as adjudicators. The
Ikhwan, still determined on jihad, raided across Saudi
borders butchering men, women and children and herding back their
animals. Transjordan and Iraq formed defence corps backed by British
armored cars, radios and aeroplanes. Unable to raid outside of Saudi
Arabia, the fighting turned inwards against other Wahhabis. Their
moral strength dissipated and Ibn Saud with an army of loyalists met
the rebel Ikhwan near Zilfi...
The final splitwithin Salafism
occurred
with the introduction of American troops into Saudi Arabia, and
specifically the lands of the Haramayn.
---
Quote: Islamic
Thinkers Society
“Rabee
al-Madkhali The
most infamous Talafi existent to date. A newly formed deviated sect
who claim to follow the path of the salaf came through him. He is
known for the science of "Jarh
& Tabdee".
He is also known as the one who is the thorn that pricks on the
throats of ahlul bida'ah. So
why avoid him?...
His
position is quite clear: Be harsh on Muslims who commit bida'ah but
be gentle on the kuffar.
This is shown through
his actions. He is infamously known for making indirect takfir
on Syed Qutb¹...
Here
is an excerpt taken from an article from another website:
¹Sh.
Rabi Al-Madkhali who said during Shawwal 1416 during
the 2nd Spring Camp in Kuwait:
"The
Ikhwan al-Muslimin are more harmful to Islam than the clear
kuffaar as the Muslims are not deceived by the kuffaar; but they are
deceived by these astray mubtadi'een. [The Muslims] are deceived by
them and fall into bid'a and various errors (dalaalat) because of
them."
"The
Ikhwan al-Muslimin and the Qutbis and those
who orbit in their circles have invaded (i.e., perhaps he means
infiltrated) [those] Salafi jama'aat which have destroyed the world
... The Ikhwan al-Muslimin don the garments of the
truth but they are the furthest of people from it. They are the
furthest away from the truth and Islam."
When
asked if the Ikhwan and Jamaat
at-Tabligh are
among the 72 sects destined for Hell, he replies "Yes."
"Tabligh fight
tawhid and the adherents of tawhid; the Ikhwan fight
tawhid and the adherents of tawhid. They fight the Salafi
minhaj and they fight its upholders; they are people of bid'a and
dalaal."
"Whoever
defends these jama'aat and says in them there is good and that they
have positive aspects, this individual sets people astray and calls
to dalaalah."
Regarding Sayyid
Qutb,
he says: "He
did not leave a bid'a but adopted it nor a fundamental of Islam but
destroyed it." (Al-Madkhali
has written four books against Sayyid Qutb accusing him of kufr on
more than ten counts.
When
Sh. Bakr Abu Zayd wrote a four page letter
to al-Madkhaliafter
reading the manuscript of the first book, advising him to drop the
project, al-Madkhali came back with a book refuting Sh. Bakr and
accusing him of being soft with the people of bida, etc.)
And
finally (and this not all), observe his extremism. When
asked regarding the permissibility of executing the members
of Jama'at at-tabligh,
al-Madkhali responds:
"I
possess the fatawaa and the deeds of the scholars to prove such.
Didn't they execute Ja'd ibn Dirham. He was better than the Ikhwan,
better than Sayyid Qutb a thousand times."
This
is why Madkhali and his teachings should be avoided.” [End
of Quote]
The
current split between the Madakhila and Sahwis occurred
after Salman Al-Awdah and Safar Al-Hawali -
both of whom have currently expressed modernist opinions - attacked
this decision of the Saudi regime and were imprisoned.
"The
method is to redefine the term 'revivalism'.
Now
we are told the modernists, isolated if not condemned, are
Al-Afghani, 'Abduh and Reda. We are told that their experiment
was confined or failed....Those who came later are now
neo-traditionalist movements which arrived in the form of
the wahhabis, the Ikhwan
al-Muslimin and Jamaat al-Islamiya, with no
relation or little relation to the modernists. The
neo-traditionalists are the new revival of Islam, they are the
revivalists. A deliberate attempt to break their connection with the
fathers of modernism and their followers has thus been formulated.
This, however, cannot be sustained. The evidence of the relationship
is huge" (The
Esoteric Deviation in Islam, 2003, p. 524).z
Quote ,SalafiMad-a-kill's: “As
we have alluded to in other threads, Abu Zubair Saleem Beg is amongst
the most
extreme of the Qutbis in the West and
he runs a forum which is a playground for the Takfiris. He
had strong attachments to Ali
at-Timimi,
who was one of main promulgators of the doctrines of al-Ikhwan
al-Muslimoon in
the West in
the latter half of the 1990s.From
the greatest of signs of the extremist Qutbiyyah of
Saleem Beg is that he
is prepared to lie outright for
the sake of 20th century non-Scholar ignoramuses who brought the
manifesto of Vladimir
Lenin to the Ummah in the guise of establishing "social
justice", as we have documented elsewhere.”
----
Salafi studentvs Salafi
student
May
Allah save us from this Wahhabi/Salafi
fitnah!
Salafi
Graduates "Students
of KNOWLEDGE" in Madinah University who
are slapping each other in the face next to the Prophet's SallAllahu
'alaihi wa sallam's grave.
-
Abdul
Wali, is from
Philly (USA)
USASalafis vs. UK Salafis!
Quote: ”By
Allah i'ma F*ck you up, By Abdul Wali graduate of the faculty of
hadeeth”
As
expected the video had been taken down!
Oops!
Too late… it’s
not going anywhere for those interested:
Original: Video/Audio
was removed from YouTube...
we
have another Link here:
"Clarification
from Abdul-Wali NelsonConcerning the Secretly Recorded Conversation"
The Audio
"recorder" was telling him that he was recording the
conversation?
In
the first 3 minutes of the salafi
conversation..!!!
Quote:
Ismeal
“Ahki, Just to let you know everything you just said is just been
recorded…
Abdul
Wali:"What ever!
Ismael:
"I am going to take this to sh.muhammed tomorrow!"
And
the “conversation” continues for another 30 minutes
---
Wahhabi/Salafi
What a Shame!
---
Bidah of the Taymiyyans
Quote:
The
Bid’ah of Yahya al Hajoori
by Abu Khadeejah:
Quote:
" Does
my Shaykh Yahya Al Hajoori & Abu Usamah At Thahabi Insult
the Companions? -
Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah
Quote:
" Why
Is Shaykh Muqbil Excused and Yahya Al-Hajuri Al-Haddadi Is Not?
The Answer:
One of their main lines of argument on the issue of the first
adhaan of Uthmaan (radiyallahu anhu) is centered around the use of the position
of ShaykhMuqbil (rahimahullaah) regarding this adhaan that it
was a bid'ah. This erroneous view of the Shaykh is used in a number of ways
a) to protect al-Hajuri, b) to claim that those attacking al-Hajuri
are really intending Shaykh Muqbil (a false claim). Here are some
points to explain why Shaykh Muqbil is excused and Yahya al-Haddadi is not: Read more: Here
Quote:
" Yahya
al-Haddadi Clipping the Statements of the Imaams of the Salaf To Justify His
Revilement Upon Uthmaan bin Affaan(radiallaahu anhu)
Yahya al-Haddadi has numerous revilements upon
the Companions (radiallaahu anhum) - even the Messenger of Allaah
(sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) has not been spared from his vile and
obnoxious tongue - and an instance of that is ascribing bid'ah to
Uthmaan(radiallaahu anhu) and declaring the action of Uthmaan(radiallaahu anhu) in adding a second aadhaan for Jumu'ah as being the
"mother" for all subsequent innovations."
