Myth or Reality ?
Ibn Baz Defends
the ‘Wahhabiyya’ and calls
them such!
It is interesting to note that the pseudo-salafis of our age, in their darkness and evil, refuse to be called “Wahhabis”.
They take offence and even go to extremes in defending their innovated title of:
“salafi” over the ascription of others who call them: “wahhabis”.
However, Bin Baz, their arch Imam in evil, anthropomorphism, treachery of the Muslims by releasing his fatwa that allowed the land of the sacred ka’abah – a land in which our very Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) still is alive within His grave, ‘alayhis salat wa salam, – to be inhabited by an army that defends the very emblems of economic tyranny through curses usury and political oppression and imperialism, called the wahhabis all sorts of wonderful names:
وليست الوهابية حسب تعبير الكاتب بدعاً في إنكار مثل هذه الأمور البدعية، بل عقيدة الوهابية: هي التمسك بكتاب الله وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم، والسير على هديه، وهدي خلفائه الراشدين، والتابعين لهم بإحسان، وما كان عليه السلف الصالح، وأئمة الدين والهدى، أهل الفقه والفتوى في باب معرفة الله، وإثبات صفات كماله ونعوت جلاله
“… Rather! The creed of the wahhabiyya is holding fast with the Book of Allah, the Sunnah of His Messenger, traversing upon His guidance, and the guidance of his rightly guided Caliphs, and those who follow them in good, and whatever the righteous forefathers were upon, and whatever the Imams of the Religions were upon, and the people of fiqh and fatwa in regards the gnosis of Allah, and affirming the attributes of Allah etc etc etc….”
All lies, but the point here is that he clearly professes the
“Creed of the Wahabiyyah!”
Source the very site of binbaz in Saudi Arabia:
---
What is a Wahhabi?
^watch: Here
---
Is it right to call someone a Wahabbi?
don't get confused with
Al-Wahhab
The Giver of All, He who donates all blessings to his creatures.
One of the names of Allahu ta'ala is Al Wahhab. The definite article 'Al' (The) makes it different from Wahhab. So the name of Allahu ta'ala is Al Wahhab and not Wahhab.
Calling someone as Wahhabi has nothing to do with the name of Allahu ta'ala. The word Wahhabi is used for followers and supporters of Ibn Abdal Wahhab al Najadi al Tamimi.
His name was Mohammed, but the sunni scholars have always used Ibn Abdal Wahhab for him , which means son of Abdal al wahhab.
Shaykh Abdal Wahhab was a sunni scholar and was aware of the deviant beliefs of his Najdi son.
For those that disagree have disagreed with Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Imaam Barbahaari, Shaykh 'Abdul Qaadir al-Jilaani, Imaam Muwaffaq ud-Deen Ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdasi and many other scholars who used the term Karaamiyyah to refer to those who follow the innovator:
Mu-hammed Bin Karaam.
With the very same reason we use the term Wahhabi or Wahhabiyyah for those who follow:
Mu-hammed Ibn 'Abdul Wahhab.
---
------------------------
said:
"We are Wahhabis"
"If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it
Maulvi Rashid Ahmad Gangohi states: " The followers of Mohammad Ibne Abdul Wahab are called “Wahhabis”, their beliefs were Excellent."(FATAWA-E-RASHIDJA , Vol. 1-Page 111)
-Wahhabi+Kaun.jpg)
With the very same reason we use the term Wahhabi or Wahhabiyyah for those who follow:
Mu-hammed Ibn 'Abdul Wahhab.
---
The
Permissibility of Calling
a Wahhabi a Wahhabi
Labelling
the groups is indeed a practice of the scholars. We have had many false cults that have broken themselves from the Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah and have been thus
labelled accordingly.
I.e.
the Khawaarij, the Qadiriyyah,
the Shi’a, the Raafidah,
the Murji’ah,
the Mutazilah, the Jahmiyyah,
the Jabbariyyah, etc.
This
labelling has not been done with the intention to mock and insult, it is merely
the way that scholars have categorized and labelled them when documenting the
deviance of each group.
For
example,
if we was to walk into a shop and there was no labels on the tin food, then how
would you differentiate between what is halal and what is haram?
How do you know that you are not picking up
some dog food, or a tin
of pork sausages in brine, whereas you intend to
buy a simple tin of beans?
What
about if you was to walk into a shop that sells medicines and the medicines had
no labels. Without saying this would be detrimental to one’s health. Therefore
the labelling is only a preventative measure to safeguard the common laity from
being poisoned and taking what is forbidden for them
The
scholars did this so that the laymen from amongst the Ahl
us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah would avoid the false
creed of such cults.
Thus
the laymen would know to avoid the Kharijites, Jahmis,
Shi’ates and so forth, and they would know not to seek religious
verdicts from such deviants. They had every
right to know about the snares of the false cults.
Had these cults not have been labelled and discussed, our Islam, and Imaan would
have been in deep peril from the innovations that these false cults have bought
about.
To
know how to avoid the false cults, then we
would have to know their names and why they was called such and what they
believed. Most of the times the cults
would have been named after their founders, but yet some cults was named after the deviance in
the creed itself, or in rare cases the country or city location they was from.
However,
there was always a good reason why the scholars labelled a cult with a title
and their intent in doing so was not derogatory in any sense.
The
Karamiyyah was named after their founder Muhammad Ibn Karam and they were known for their denial of the Attributes of Allah.
The
Khawaarij were named by the Prophet
sal Allahu alayhi wasallam himself, he even called them the worst of
creation and the dogs of the hellfire. The Khawaarij
derives from the root Kha-ra-ja which means to
exit, and that is exactly what the Khawaarij
did. They exited the religion for rebelling against the rulers, takfeering the
leaders and the general laity of the Muslims and making their blood permissible
to spill.
The
Hururiyyah, were a offshoot of the Khawaarij, named after their founder and their
locality al-Hurur. Without labelling the cults
in such a fashion, many innovations would have went unchecked, and the people
would have lent their ears to the innovators unknowingly, and we would not have
Islam in its pure form
The
Prophet spoke about the dangers of the Khawaarij more than any other cult that was to appear.
This is recorded in the Ahaadeeth when one of his companions Dhul Khuwaisira at-Tameemi spoke and rebelled by
questioning the Prophets honesty and
integrity. He accused the Prophet of
wrong-doing. The Prophet warned the Sahaabah that from Dhul
Khuwaisira at-Tameemi’s offspring would appear a people that recited the
Qur’an, but it did not go further than their throats, and that they would go
out of the religion like an arrow goes through a deers body. The Prophet also
warned us that the Khawaarij would keep appearing
up until the appearence of the Dajjal.
Since
the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam spoke
of them so much, and his prophecies regarding them came true, and still come
true to this very day, the scholars, past and present have deemed them to be
the most dangerous cult to have ever plagued this earth. The Khawaarij descended from the tribe of tameem and the
tribe of tameem originated from the harsh deserts of central ‘Arabia known as Najd.
Not
only has
the Prophet warned us about the Khawaarij, he also warned us much about the fitnaah that would arise and come from Najd. In one hadeeth he refused to du’a for Najd,
whereas he would regularly pray for Sham, Yemen, Iraq and other locations of
the Muslim world.
This
does not mean that everybody from Najd or from the Banu Tameem is evil and misguided. This thought is a false
notion propagated by some of our brothers.
Indeed
we have Abdul Wahhab himself, the father of the misguided
Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. We also have Sulaymaan Ibn Abdul
Wahhab. Both were great Hanbali scholars that are renown for their
condemnation of the of their very own family member Muhammad
Ibn Abdul Wahhab who spearheaded the Wahhabi
cult.
So
whenever you hear a cultist talking about the virtues of the Bani Tameem, then
do not be fooled, for indeed the offspring of Banu Tameem can be either
righteous or evil. After all the Prophet sal
Allahu alayhi wasallam said “from amongst their
offspring will arise a people”, he did not say “All
of his offspring”.
We
have to be fair
and keep this factor in mind when dealing with these issues. However, do not be
tricked by those who call evil good and call the good evil,
for this is exactly the stance that cultists take when you discuss their cult.
What I mean by this is that the virtues of Bani Tameem can never refer to Dhul Khuwaisira, or the Khawaarij,
nor Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, no matter if he
is a descendant from Isma’el alayhis Salaam, because it is known that
the descendants of the Prophets went astray, such as Bani
Israel, the children of Yaqub alayhis Salaam. And most
certainly we are all Bani Adam.
So
now we have considered these points the question still remains, is it
legitimate to label the people who respect and adhere to the teachings of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab as a Wahhabi?
Secondly
is this truly a distortion of Allah’s divine name al-Wahhab? and thirdly, is this
merely a title used by the enemies of Islam?
Since
classical scholars
have labelled those, who argue that humans do not have any free will, with the
title Jabbariyyah, it is perfectly permissible
to label the deviant creed and following of Muhammad
Ibn Abdul Wahhab as the Wahhabiyyah.
al-Jabbar and al-Wahhab
are both names
of Allah,
and to call somebody a Jabbari or a Wahhabi is simply making
them term
al-Jabbariyyah or al-Wahhabiyyah into its active participle.
This
can be seen by the fact that the active participle for the Jahmiyyah is Jahmi and
anybody that is on the creed of the Jahmiyyah is
known as a Jahmi.
This
is not a distortion of the names of Allah.
For the simple reason being that the
terms Jabariyyah, Wahhabiyyah, Karaamiyyah
and Qadiriyyah are all derivatives
of Allah’s name, which means they may have the same same root,
they may share the same reappearing trilateral letters but, the nouns Jabbariyyah, Wahabiyyah and so forth are not
the actual names of Allah when said in this form of a noun.
The same goes for the active participle Wahhabi,
in which when spelled in the Arabic language has a yaa
as its final letter, and therefore is not the same as saying the Lord’s
name al-Wahhab. Anybody with a basic understanding of Arabic morphology [
ilm us-sarf] would know this fact and would not use such a false argument
as these Wahhabis are doing in order to
scare their following into believing that they are not a false cult.
---
Ibn Baz recognises the legitimacy of
the term “wahabiyya” for the so called Salafi movement.
Ibn
Baz says:
مجموع فتاوا ومقالات متنوعة
الوهابية منسوبة إلى الشيخ الإمام محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله المتوفى سنة ١٢٠٦ه, وهو الذي قام بادعوة إلى الله سبحانه في نجد
مجموع فتاوا ومقالات متنوعة
الوهابية منسوبة إلى الشيخ الإمام محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله المتوفى سنة ١٢٠٦ه, وهو الذي قام بادعوة إلى الله سبحانه في نجد
مجموع فتاوا ومقالات متنوعة, ٢٣٠
[Questions
of Muslim newspaper, dictating Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, in 12/3/1417 AH. (1996CE)]
------------------------
The Deobandi/Tablighi
"akabir's"
"akabir's"
said:
"We are Wahhabis"
In fact, clarifying
and reiterating his and the beliefs of the Deobandis, Maulvi Manzoor Nomani, head
of the Tableeghi Jamaat states:
"And we also state here clearly that we are Extreme “Wahhabis"
(SA WANEH MAULANA MOHAMMAD YUSUF KANDHALVI - Page 192)
"And we also state here clearly that we are Extreme “Wahhabis"
(SA WANEH MAULANA MOHAMMAD YUSUF KANDHALVI - Page 192)
In the words of the
Patron of Tableeghi Jamaat, Maulvi Mohammad Zakaria Khandhalvi:
"Maulvi Sahib, I myself am a Greater Wahhabi than you."
(SA WANEH MAULANA MOHAMMAD YUSUF-Page 192)
"Maulvi Sahib, I myself am a Greater Wahhabi than you."
(SA WANEH MAULANA MOHAMMAD YUSUF-Page 192)
In the words of
the Central Directorate of 'Tableeghi Jamaat' Maulvi Ashraf Ali Thanwi:
"Brother, here Wahhabis reside, do not bring anything for 'Fathea, Niaz', etc. here." ("...Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, "Brethren! This place is populated by Wahhabis. Don't bring anything here for the sake of faatihah and niyaaz.") scan Here (Ashrafus Sawaneh, Book 1-Page 45)
"Brother, here Wahhabis reside, do not bring anything for 'Fathea, Niaz', etc. here." ("...Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, "Brethren! This place is populated by Wahhabis. Don't bring anything here for the sake of faatihah and niyaaz.") scan Here (Ashrafus Sawaneh, Book 1-Page 45)
"If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it
and people would have automatically become WAHHABI" ( Al Ifadatul Yaumiya)
Maulvi Rashid Ahmad Gangohi states: " The followers of Mohammad Ibne Abdul Wahab are called “Wahhabis”, their beliefs were Excellent."(FATAWA-E-RASHIDJA , Vol. 1-Page 111)
--
"To Be or Not To Be"
Wahhabi
SHAYKH AL-HADITH OF DAR AL-ULUM DEOBAND
IBN TAYMIYYA & IBN ABDUL WAHHAB NAJDI
------------
THE NAJDI SHEIKH
---------------------------
Wahhabi Kaun?
Hazrat Pir Syed
Naseer Ud Din Naseer Shah Sahib (RA)
-Wahhabi+Kaun.jpg)
---
---
Wahhabism -
Myth or Reality ?
Myth or Reality ?
---
Read
‘AL-WAHAABIYYAH’ ARE THE FOLLOWERS OF
SHAYTAAN (HIZBUSH SHAYTAAN)
---
SPECIFIES THAT THE PRESENT
WAHHABIS ARE KHAWAARIJ
---
Haji
Dost Muhammad Qandahari
To maintain the right doctrine and to do the (righteous) acts, the books written by the pious ancestors the Ahl as-Sunnāt wal-Jamā’ah are sufficient for us.
These books should be under your consideration, do not read the writings of the Wahhabi sect and refrain from their beliefs. If you wish to observe the powerful effect of our Great Masters in yourself, may Allah best sanctify their secrets, then you should follow your masters in all issues, practical or doctrinal, apparent or inner. Allah willing, you will get the fruit of the Reality and Cognition of the Exalted Haqq.
Just say: Allah bass Māsiwā Abas wa Hawas wan-Qati’ alaih in-Nafs
That’s all.
Excerpt
from letter 30 of the Maktubat of Hāji Dost Muhammad Qandahāri
Naqshbandi(1801-1868), a great Naqshbandi master of
India in the 19th century
Written to Molvi Abdullāh,
advising him to refrain from the beliefs of the Wahhabi sect
It
has come to knowledge through the visitors that Molvi Ghiyās ad-Dīn believes in the
issues of the Wahhabi sect and teaches these issues to the people. Therefore it is
emphasized to you in writing that abhor the beliefs of the Wahhabis and loathe by heart
the Ismāīli
Wahhabi sect [1].
To maintain the right doctrine and to do the (righteous) acts, the books written by the pious ancestors the Ahl as-Sunnāt wal-Jamā’ah are sufficient for us.
These books should be under your consideration, do not read the writings of the Wahhabi sect and refrain from their beliefs. If you wish to observe the powerful effect of our Great Masters in yourself, may Allah best sanctify their secrets, then you should follow your masters in all issues, practical or doctrinal, apparent or inner. Allah willing, you will get the fruit of the Reality and Cognition of the Exalted Haqq.
Just say: Allah bass Māsiwā Abas wa Hawas wan-Qati’ alaih in-Nafs
(Allah is sufficient, everything else is vain and lust, cut-off yourself
from them).
That’s all.
And
Salām is the best ending!
Written
on the 23rd of Shawwāl 1279 H. (Sunday 12 April 1863 C.E.)
[1]. Here the word Ismāīli refers to Molvi Ismāīl Dehlavi who brought the Wahhabi beliefs from Arabia to India
More info: Here
Dahlan, al-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zayni (d.
1304AH/1886CE).
Mufti of Mecca and Shaykh al-Islam (highest religious authority in the Ottoman jurisdiction) for the Hijaz region: al-Durar al-saniyyah fi al-radd ala al-Wahhabiyyah ["The Pure Pearls in Answering the Wahhabis"] pub. Egypt 1319 & 1347 H; Fitnat al-Wahhabiyyah ["The Wahhabi Fitna"]; Khulasat al-Kalam fi bayan Umara' al-Balad al-Haram ["The Summation Concerning the Leaders of the Sacrosanct Country"], a history of the Wahhabi fitna in Najd and the Hijaz.
Mufti of Mecca and Shaykh al-Islam (highest religious authority in the Ottoman jurisdiction) for the Hijaz region: al-Durar al-saniyyah fi al-radd ala al-Wahhabiyyah ["The Pure Pearls in Answering the Wahhabis"] pub. Egypt 1319 & 1347 H; Fitnat al-Wahhabiyyah ["The Wahhabi Fitna"]; Khulasat al-Kalam fi bayan Umara' al-Balad al-Haram ["The Summation Concerning the Leaders of the Sacrosanct Country"], a history of the Wahhabi fitna in Najd and the Hijaz.
al-Minha al-Wahbiyya fi radd al-Wahhabiyya ["The
Divine Dispensation Concerning the Wahhabi Deviation"]; Ashadd
al-Jihad fi Ibtal Da`wa al-Ijtihad ["The Most Violent Jihad in
Proving False Those Who Falsely Claim Ijtihad"].
Sayyidi `Abd Allah ibn `Alawi al-Haddad al-Shafi`i: al-Sayf
al-batir li `unq al-munkir `ala al-akabir ["The Sharp Sword for the
Neck of the Assailant of Great Scholars"]. Unpublished manuscript of about
100 folios; Misbah al-anam wa jala' al-zalam fi radd shubah al-bid`i
al-najdi al-lati adalla biha al-`awamm ["The Lamp of Mankind and the
Illumination of Darkness Concerning the Refutation of the Errors of the
Innovator From Najd by Which He Had Misled the Common People"]. Published
1325H.(1907CE)
Al-Husayni, `Amili, Muhsin (1865-1952).
Kashf
al-irtiyab fi atba` Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab ["The Dispelling of
Doubt Concerning the Followers of Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab"]. [Yemen?]:
Maktabat al-Yaman al-Kubra
Al-Mirghani al-Ta'ifi, `Allama `Abd Allah ibn Ibrahim (d.1793CE):
Tahrid
al-aghbiya' `ala al-Istighatha bil-anbiya' wal-awliya ["The
Provocations of the Ignorant Against Seeking the Help of Prophets and
Saints"] (Cairo: al-Halabi, 1939).
Mu'in al-Haqq al-Dehlawi (d. 1289):
Sayf al-Jabbar al-maslul `ala a`da' al-Abrar ["The Sword of the Almighty Drawn Against the Enemies of the Pure Ones"].
Sayf al-Jabbar al-maslul `ala a`da' al-Abrar ["The Sword of the Almighty Drawn Against the Enemies of the Pure Ones"].
Al-Nabahani al-Shafi`i, al-qadi al-muhaddith Yusuf ibn
Isma`il (1850-1932):
Shawahid al-Haqq fi al-istighatha bi sayyid al-Khalq (s) ["The Proofs of Truth in the Seeking of the Intercession of the Prophet"].
Shawahid al-Haqq fi al-istighatha bi sayyid al-Khalq (s) ["The Proofs of Truth in the Seeking of the Intercession of the Prophet"].
Al-Qazwini, Muhammad Hasan,(d.1825CE)
Al-Barahin
al-jaliyyah fi raf` tashkikat al-Wahhabiyah ["The Plain
Demonstrations That Dispel the Aspersions of the Wahhabis"]. Ed.
Muhammad Munir al-Husayni al-Milani. 1st ed. Beirut: Mu'assasat
al-Wafa', 1987.
Shaykh al-Islam in Tunis: wrote a refutation of a treatise of Ibn `Abd
al-Wahhab.
al-Fajr
al-Sadiq fi al-radd 'ala munkiri al-tawassul wa al-khawariq ["The
True Dawn in Refuting Those Who Deny the Seeking of Intercession and the
Miracles of Saints"] Pub. 1323/1905 in Egypt.
and many other scholars...
--
--
A Demonstration that the Wahhabis
are Khawarij
taken from the book 'Ihya al-Maqbur' pages 59-60.
by the late Muhaddith of the Age,
Imam Abu'l-Fayd Ahmad ibn Abi Abdallah al-Siddiq al-Ghimmari,
author of 143 books.
taken from the book 'Ihya al-Maqbur' pages 59-60.
by the late Muhaddith of the Age,
Imam Abu'l-Fayd Ahmad ibn Abi Abdallah al-Siddiq al-Ghimmari,
author of 143 books.
“As for the Qarniyyun,
their land has not been blessed by Allah with any wali or salih
since the beginning of Islam down to the present day. Instead, he only gave it
the Qarn al-Shaytan ['the Devil's Horn'], whose followers were the
Khawarij of the thirteenth and subsequent Islamic centuries. So fear God, and
do not be like he who is beguiled by them, and supports their corrupt sect and
worthless opinion, and their state of misguidance which was explicitly
described by the Prophet (upon whom be blessings and peace), who characterised
them as the 'Dogs of the Fire' [kilab al-nar], and informed us that they
are the 'worst of all who dwell beneath the sky', and that they 'swerve from
the religion as an arrow swerves away from its target,' and that they mouth
among the best of sayings in the form of their prattlings about Tawhid, and
implementing the Sunna, and combating bid'as - and yet, by Allah, they are
drowning in bid'a; in fact, there is no bid'a worse than theirs, which causes
them to 'swerve from the religion as an arrow swerves away from its target', in
spite of their superficial efforts in worship and adherence to the religion. It
is as the Prophet (upon whom be blessings and peace) declared: 'one of you
would despise the prayer he says among them, and the fasting he completes with
them; they recite Qur'an but it goes no further than their collarbones.'
It is for this reason that he refrained (upon him
be blessings and peace) from making du'a for Najd in the way that he had prayed
for the Yemen and for Syria, for he said: 'Allahumma bless us in our Yemen;
bless us in our Syria' - and they said, 'And in our Najd, o Messenger of
Allah?' (upon him be blessings and peace), but he repeated his prayer for the
Yemen and for Syria; and they repeated their utterance; until he said, the
second or the third time round, in order to explain why he would not pray for
Najd:
'That is the place of earthquakes, and fitnas, and
from it the Devil's Horn shall rise.' [Narrated by Bukhari.] And nothing has
emerged from there to bring about earthquakes and fitnas in the religion like
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who was astray and led others astray. Hence he was
the Devil's Horn foretold by the Messenger (upon him be blessings and peace),
and he abstained from offering prayer for Najd because of him, and because of
the fitnas which would flow from his demonic da'wa.
Whoever adheres to
that da'wa has committed unambiguous kufr, and is destined for apostasy and
'swerving from the religion', as is visible in the case of the other mulhids
[heretical unbelievers] of the age who are notorious for their ilhad, for in
every case they began by holding fast to the sect of the Devil's Horn, as is
well-known to scholars of experience and insight.”
--
(Edited by ADHM)
