Tuesday, December 28, 2010

THE HADITH OF THE CITY OF CAESAR




DETAILED ANALYSIS OF
THE HADITH OF THE CITY OF CAESAR

---

Quote:

Ibn Taymiyyah said , "And the hadeeth of Bukhaari states the first army to wage Jihaad against Constantinople is forgiven and the first army to do Jihaad against Constantinople, their Ameer was Yazeed ibn Mu’waiyyah and the word army entails a specific number and every member of this army is included in this forgiveness. " (Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah Fee Naqdh Kalaam ash-Shee’ah Wal-Qadariyyah (2/252), al-Muntaqa Minhaaj al-Ei’tidaal Fee Naqdh Kalaam ar-Rafdh Wal-Ei’tizaal (pg.290).

Al-Dhahabi said: "he was the commander of that army during the campaign against Constantinople, among which were people such as Abu Ayyoob al-Ansaari. Yazeed was appointed by his father as his heir, so he took power after his father died in Rajab 60 AH at the age of thirty-three, but his reign lasted for less than four years."

---


---

It is said about Yazid that because he participated in first siege of the city of Caesar i.e.Constantinople (Urdu–Qustuntuniya), he is worthy of being forgiven and he has already been forgiven. To prove this, a Hadith from Sahih Bukhari is quoted.

---

IN THE FOLLOWING LINES, A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THIS HADITH IS BEING PENNED

There is a Hadith in Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 409, 410

(Hadith No. 2924)

It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May Allah SWT be well pleased with her) that she heard the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) say:

The army from My Ummah, who will first perform jihad through the water (sea), has made Jannah obligatory for itself. Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May Allah SWT be well pleased with her) entreated, "O Prophet of Allah SWT, Am I among them? He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: Yes. Then the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: The army from My Ummah, who will first attack the city of Caesar is forgiven. I entreated: Am I among them, O Prophet of Allah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)? He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: No."

If the collections of Hadith, the books of Rijal and the canons of history are honestly gone through, then the falsity of the aforementioned deduction (including Yazid in this Hadith) will be understood easily. Using the above Hadith to include Yazid among those who have been forgiven is incorrect for many reasons.

---

FIRST INTERPRETATION OF THIS HADITH


In regard to this Hadith, the Hadith-Masters have given a opinion that the "city of Caesar" mentioned in the Hadith is not Constantinople, but Hims, which was the capital of Roman Empire in the days of the Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
It is given in Fath ul Bari in the interpretation of this Hadith.
Translation: "Some interpreters have said that the city of Caesar means the city which was the capital of the Roman Empire in the blessed era of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam). That city is Hims. At that time, it was the capital of the Roman Empire."

(The Castle of Hims)

This interpretation is all the more significant, because in Sahih Bukhari and in all other books, the word "Constantinople" is not used! Only "the city of Caesar" is mentioned. Caesar was the Emperor of the Roman Empire. The city in which he lived or was his capital will only be termed as "city of Caesar."


According to the wording of the Hadith, that city is Hims[1].
In the caliphate of Hadhrat Umar Al Faruq (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), in 15AH(636CE) an army under the command of Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) attacked Hims.


Muslims laid siege to Hims in harsh winter and the end of winter, they conquered it.

In this battle, Hadhrat Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), Hadhrat Bilal (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), Hadhrat Miqdaad (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and many other Sahabah participated.

Imam Ibn Atheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) has mentioned among the incidents of 15A.H, in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 2, Pg No. 339: Translation: When Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) finished the campaign of Damascus, he took the route of Ba'albak to Hims."

At that time Yazid was not even born let alone participating in the battle.

Yazid was born in 26A.Has Imam Ibn Atheer wrote in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76: Translation: "Yazid bin Mu'awiyah was born in 26 A.H."

A possible objection against this Hadith might be that in the Hadith mentioned, first the Jihad by sea is mentioned, in which Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May Allah SWT be well pleased with her) is a participant, then the siege of the city of Caesar is mentioned. If the city of Caesar is Hims, then it should have been mentioned first but it is not so.

The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) first mentioned the Jihad by sea and then the siege of the city of Caesar.

It should be remembered that the order of incidents might be according to what is being said or might be according to the order of occurrence.

In this Hadith, it is according to what is said, not in the order of occurrence.

SECOND INTERPRETATION OF THIS HADITH

Other interpreters have opined that "the city of Caesar" means Constantinople.

Still Yazid is not included in the ambit of the said Hadith as Muslims attacked Constantinople a number of times and the glad tidings of forgiveness are only for those who participated in the first siege.

Nowwhat is to be seen is that, when did Muslims attack Constantinople for the first time and which is the first army?





FIRST ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

It is written in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179 about the first army which attacked Constantinople. Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) attacked Rome in 32AH and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of Constantinople : It is given in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25.

 This shows that Constantinople was first attacked by Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). There is no mention of Yazid participating in this siege! According to Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76: Yazid was born in 26 A.H., so in 32A.H, he was a kid of 6 years old.


SECOND ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

 It is written in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179 about the first army which attacked Constantinople.
Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) attacked Rome in 32A.H. and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of Constantinople :
It is given in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25. This shows that Constantinople was first attacked by Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). There is no mention of Yazid participating in this siege. According to Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76.
Yazid was born in 26 A.H., so in A.H. 32, he was a kid of 6 years old.



THIRD ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

The third attack on Constantinople was in 44 A.H. or 46 A.H. It is written in Tarikh Kamil in the incidents of the year of 44A.H: Translation: In 44 A.H. Muslims, with Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) entered Rome and spent winter there only and Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) fought through the sea." Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg no. 298
It is given in the same book in the incidents of 46A.H., Translation: Malik bin Abdullah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) remained in the kingdom of Rome and it has been said that Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) and returned to Hims the same year and passed away into the presence of Allah SWT."

The Commander of third army to attack to Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them). This attack has been mentioned not only in the books of history, but also in Sunan Abu Dawood, which is a reliable book from the Sihah Sittah (the 6 most authentic and reliable books of Hadith).

It is given in Sunan Abu Dawood, Vol 1, Kitabul Jihad, Pg No. 340 (Hadith No: 2151),"Muslims attacked Constantinople and in this battle, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) was the commander. Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Imran (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him): We left Madina with the intention of attacking Constantinople. The commander of the army was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). The Romans had their backs to the ramparts. A person readied himself for attack. The people said: La ilaha illallah, he is taking himself to death. Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) said: This verse has been revealed about us, when Allah SWT helped the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and made Islam dominant, then we said, 'Come let us remain with our property and wealth and set them right,' then Allah SWT sent this command: And spend in the way of Allah SWT and do not put yourself in mortal danger.” Surah Baqra- 195 and so to take oneself to death is to remain with our property, busy oneself in setting them right and abandon Jihad.

Abu Imran
says that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) used to perform Jihad for the sake of Allah SWT, to the extent that he was buried in Constantinople."

According to the above mentioned details, the army, which attacked Constantinople under Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) in 32 A.H. is the first army and this is the army, which according to Sahih Bukhari, is forgiven.

It is made clear by the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, that the Commander of the army, which attacked Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them), who passed away in either 46 A.H. or 47 A.H, as given in Tarikh Kamil in the incidents of 46 A.H.

Sunan Abu Dawood is from among the Sihah Sittah (the six most authentic books of Hadith). It is by all standards more preferable than the books of history. This proves beyond doubt that under the leadership of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) Constantinople was attacked before 46A.H. or 47 A.H., as the canons of history and Rijal establish that Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) passed away in 46 or 47 A.H.

In 32 A.H, 43 A.H, 44 A.H. or 46 A.H. Yazid did not participate in any of these 3 sieges.


IN WHICH SIEGE DID YAZID PARTICIPATE?

To find out whether Yazid is included in the glad tidings of forgiveness given in the Hadith, it should be found in which attack of Constantinople did Yazid participate and in which year?

There are 4 opinions in this regard.

He(Yazid) participated in the battle of Rome in 49 A.H.(Yazid 23/24 years old) and he reached Constantinople as given in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 8, Pg. No. 34:

Translation: In 49 A.H. Yazid bin Mu'awiyah attacked the kingdom of Rome and reached Constantinople.

Yazid participated in the attack of 50 A.H., as given in Umdatul Qari, Vol 5, Pg No. 558:

Translation: Muslims reached Constantinople in this attack and laid siege to it and Yazid was the commander on the behalf of his father."

Yazid participated in the attack of 52 A.H.

Imam Badruddin 'Aini Hanafi (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) preferred this opinion and said that this opinion is to be preferred that Yazid participated in the 52 A.H.(Yazid 26/27 years old) attack of Constantinople, as given in Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Kitab ul Jihad, Pg No. 244.

Hadhrat Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) sent Yazid in 55 A.H.(Yazid 29/30 years old) to attack Constantinople, as given in: Al Isabaa fi marifati Sahabah.

Whichever opinion is preferred, it does not prove that Yazid participated in the first siege of Constantinople, because Constantinople had been attacked multiple times before it.

About the opinions of Yazid's participation, the first one according to chronological order is 49 A.H, when before this in

32 A.H. Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and after him in

43 A.H. Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), then in

44 A.H or 46 A.H., Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), had all attacked Constantinople.

Neither the books of Hadith nor the books of Rijal mention Yazid's participation in any of these attacks nor has any historian mentioned it.

Therefore saying that yazid participated under the Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) and is therefore forgiven is not supported by any of the books of Rijal or history. Instead by reconciling the books of Rijal and history, we come to know that this is a fabrication. Believing in this without any support from the canons of history is akin to changing the history of Islam.

A DOUBT AND ITS ANSWER

There can be a question about the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) passed away in the battle which had been fought under Yazid, as given in Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 158:

Translation: Mahmood bin Rabe'e says that I described this to the people, in which the Sahabi Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) was present on the occasion of this battle. He passed away in this battle and Yazid bin Mu'awiyah was the commander of this army in Rome."

In the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) is mentioned. It is also mentioned in the same Hadith that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) performed Jihad continuously to the extent that he passed away.

It may seem that Yazid was present in the army of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid, but this is incorrect because Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) did not pass away when he was under the command of Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him).

Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) led the attack on Constantinople in 44 or 46 A.H. and he passed away in 46 or 47 A.H. Constantinople has been attacked after that, in 49 A.H. under the command of Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and in 52 under the command of Yazid bin Mu'awiyah.

Hadhrat Abu Ayyub (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) participated in both the battles that took place after the passing away of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). In the attack of 52 A.H., he passed away and this is the army, which has been mentioned in Sahih Bukhari.

According to the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid's (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) commanding the army and his passing away in 46 or 47 A.H., Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) participation in the battles of 49 and 52 A.H. and his passing away in 52 A.H. and Yazid's participation in this particular battle, all this prove that Yazid did not participate in the battle that was fought under the command of
Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). It has also been proved that the siege in which Yazid participated, was not the first siege, but before this in 32, 43 and 46 A.H., Constantinople had been attacked.

When Yazid did not participate in the first siege of Constantinople, he is not included in the forgiveness referred to in the Hadith, because the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) never said that all the armies which attack Constantinople are forgiven, but He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said that only the first army to attack Constantinople is forgiven.

---



YAZID DID NOT
PARTICIPATE SINCERELY IN THE LATER BATTLES

History proves that even in the later battles, Yazid did not participate sincerely. Instead he participated only on the insistence of Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him, as given in Tarikh Kamil Vol 3, Pg No. 314, under the incidents of 49 A.H and 50 A.H.

Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) sent a huge army to Rome in 50 A.H. Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) was appointed as the commander of the army and Yazid was ordered to go with the army.

Yazid started making excuses cited illness and did not go. Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) also did not go. In this journey, the Mujahideen faced hunger, thirst and a host of other difficulties.


When Yazid was told about this, he recited some couplets, in which he said: I don't care about the fever, difficulties which the army faces at the Firqodona (place name), at der murran, I am sitting on a high mattress and Umme Kulthoom (Yazid's wife) is with me.”

When Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah came to know of this, he said with an oath, that Yazid should be definitely sent to the commander Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), so that he understands the difficulties of the Mujahideen. Umdatul Qari Vol 10, Kitab Ul Jihad.

These details of Umdatul Qari and Tarikh Ul Kamil show the character of Yazid that to save himself from jihad, he made excuses. When the Mujahideen faced difficulties, fell ill, he expressed his happiness, which is in not allowed in the light of the Shariah. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has prohibited against expressing happiness on the difficulties of Muslims. There is a Hadith in Shu'abul Iman (Hadith No: 2507)

Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Syeduna Waathila bin Asqa'a (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: You should not express happiness on the difficulty of your brother, lest Allah SWT has mercy on him and embroils you in that difficulty."

Yazid did not obey his father's command which is a major sin (Gunaah Kabira). He feigned illness, even when he was healthy, which is lies and deception. Later, when Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) put him under oath to go, he reluctantly joined the army. Can it be hoped that when he joined the army reluctantly, he would be rewarded for Jihad, when the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has said,

Translation: Verily, acts are rewarded according to the intentions."

Imam Badruddin 'Aini (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him)
Translation: What excellence can be there for Yazid, when his state is so well known."

Even if it is said that Yazid participated in Jihad with all his heart and is forgiven according to the Hadith, then does it mean that all his later sins are also forgiven?

In the interpretation of the Hadith of the city of Caesar, the interpreters:

Imam 'Aini, Imam Ibn Hajar 'Asqalani, Imam Qustulani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on them), all have written in the interpretation of this Hadith, that the forgiveness mentioned in this Hadith is only when the person is worthy of being forgiven.

It is written in Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Pg No. 244: Translation: Even if Yazid did join the army, even then because of his later crimes, he has been excluded from this glad tiding. For this reason, the 'Ulama (scholars) of the Ummah agree that the words, "they are forgiven" implies that provided they are worthy of being forgiven.

If after participating in that battle, someone leaves Islam, turns into a defector (Murtad) and then dies, then that person is not included in that glad tiding. This shows that the Hadith of the Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) means that the person joining in the army will be forgiven, only when the eligibility is found in that person.", Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Pg No. 244.

A QUESTION FOR THE SUPPORTERS OF YAZID


Those people who support Yazid and claim that he participated in the siege of Constantinople and is therefore forgiven, even when the facts have been brought out can they bring forth any proof from the Quran or the Sunnah?

Even if he had participated, will all his later sins be forgiven and Allah SWT will not take him to account for them?

There are other acts also for which forgiveness has being declared. There is a Hadith in Sunan Ibn Majah, Bab Majaa fil Ghusl, Pg No. 105: Translation: Whoever washes a dead body, enshrouds it, perfumes it, carries the Janazah, offers its Salaat ul Janazah, and does not reveal if he sees anything in the dead body, that person is as free of sins on that day as if his mother gave birth to him on that day.

In the same way, there is a Hadith about Hajj: Syeduna Abu Hurairah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) relates: I heard the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) say:

Whoever performs a Hajj, uttered no obscenities, did nothing bad, he will return that day in such a state as if his mother has given birth to him.–Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 206

There is a Hadith in Sahih Muslim: Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: Whoever bears the responsibility of an orphan or makes someone responsible for the orphan, I (i.e. the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)) and that person will be like 2 fingers (i.e. so close), Imam Malik (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) gestured with the first and the middle finger.

There are many Hadith in which glad tidings of forgiveness have been given.

Does the forgiveness mentioned in the above Hadith and in other Hadith mean that a person after performing the above acts can leave Fardh Salaat, drink wine, steal, persecute somebody, hurt somebody, murder somebody, even then because of the past virtuous acts, all his later sins will be forgiven? No, what it means is that because of the virtuous acts, the earlier sins are forgiven and not the later sins.

Otherwise, it should be said that if any person performs a Hajj, washes a dead body, or bears the responsibility of an orphan, that person can leave Salaat, drink wine, steal, persecute somebody, hurt and murder somebody but these sins will not affect him, only because that person has performed some virtuous acts. No sane person will accept that. This is a castle in the air. If this is accepted as correct, then the society cannot be kept free of oppression.

SUMMARY

The Hadith-Masters have interpreted the Hadith, "the first army from My Ummah to attack Caesar is forgiven in many ways. One of them is that the city if Caesar mentioned in the Hadith is not Constantinople, but Hims, which was the capital city of the Roman Empire in the era of the Prophet, as given in Fath Ul Bari. This city was conquered in the caliphate of Hadhrat Umar (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him).

Even if it is accepted as Constantinople according to the opinion given by other interpreters, Yazid is still not included in the forgiveness, as Yazid did not participate in the first siege of Constantinople.

The first siege of Constantinople took place in 32 A.H. under Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him).

The second siege took place in 43 A.H. under the command of Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him).

The third siege took place in 44A.H or 46 A.H. under the command Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). Yazid did not participate in any of these attacks. There are 4 opinions about Yazid's participation in the attack on Constantinople–in 49, 50, 52 or 55 A.H. Even if any of them is accepted as true, then Yazid cannot be said to have participated in the first siege as the first siege took place in 32 A.H.. Therefore, Yazid is not included in the forgiveness mentioned in the Hadith.

May Allah SWT implant the love of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) in our hearts and bless it with the love of the Ahle Bait, the elders of our Deen, the Auliya and the virtuous people (saliheen) and protect our faith from all kinds of trial tribulations and make us follow the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).

----------------------------------


[1]Homs or Hims (Arabic: حمص‎, Homs or Hims; previously Greek: Ἔμεσα, Emesa) is a city in western Syria

“...when 'Umar b. al-Khattab entered Jerusalem in 636 CE,

and eventually settled in Hims.”

(The Qur'an: an encyclopedia,page323, By Oliver Leaman)

-----------------------------------



Ibn Yazid Zakir Nalayik (LA)



“Hadith of Constantinople”:
Dr Zakir said, “Yazid was the leader of that first siege of Constantinople”:

-----------------

Also watch video of
Shaykh Tahir - ul - Qadri:
(Yazid was on the 8th Lashkar (8th Siege of Constantinople):
----------


The Wahhabi/Salafi and their brothers the Deobandis claim:

“Yazid was part of that first army”
?



The wording of the Hadith are :
"awwalu jaishin min ummati yaghzoona madinata Qaisara maghfurullahum"
(Hadith No. 8668).

Thus, it could be any city of Byzantine Empire

You read any Islamic History book written by any well known Islamic historian (including Salafi scholar Al-Dhahabi, Ibn Katheer etc.) it is mentioned that the first Muslim invasion of Constantinople, Byzantine empire took place in 42 H in which Yazid was not there.

The second invasion of Muslims on Byzantine Empire was in 43H under the command of Bu'sr bin Abi Arta, and the Army reached the city of Constantinople.

Yazid was not part of this Army.

The third invasion of Muslims took place in 44 H under the command of Abd ar-Rahman bin Khaled bin Walid. In this invasion, Busr bin Abi Arta also participated and attacked Constantinople from Sea.

Yazid was not part of this Army.

The fifth invasion of Constantinople was in 46 H under the command of Malik bin Abdullah. Yazid was not part of this Muslim Army.

The sixth invasion of Byzantine Empire was undertaken in 47 H under the command of Malik bin Hubaira.

Yazid was not part of this Army.

Three invasions took place on Byzantine empire in 49 H under the commands of (i) Malik bin Hubaira and (ii) Fazala bin Ubair.

Fazala bin Ubair captured many cities of Byzantine Empire.

The third invasion of Byzantine Empire took place in the same year under the command of Yazid bin Shajara Ar-Rahawi, who hailed from Syria.

It is wrongly, may be deliberately claimed by Wahhabis and their like minded Groups that the commander of this Army was Yazid bin Mu'awia, which is not true.

We invite our readers to read any History books of Islam, (including the history books written by Salafi Scholars) they will find the truth in this context.

The 8th invasion of Byzantine empire took place in 50H and in this invasion, some scholars claim that Yazid bin Mua'wia was part of this Army.


Thus Yazid was part of the Army of 8th invasion of Byzantine Empire.

The Hadith says that the “first Muslim Army” who will invade Byzantine empire is Jannati. Then how come he is claimed to be Jannati?
The Salafis mention Hadith Guide book Fatahul Bari written by Ibn Hajar Asqalani in which it is written that 'the invasion of Constantinople took place in 52 H and the commander of this Army was Yazid.
Even if we take this date as authentic, then this will be the ninth invasion of that city, and not the first one. Because, as we have mentioned earlier with authentic sources that 8 invasions had already taken place before this date. Therefore, Yazid cannot be part of the people who are declared Jannati by The Holy Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم).
It is also mentioned in many Islamic History books that at the time of 8th invasion of Byzantine empire, Hazrat Muawiah(RA) wanted Yazid(LA) to participate, but he refused. We do not understand why these sects want to favor Yazid against Imam Hussain (AS)? They should know the result of their favor and wrath of Allah (SWT) they will face on the Day of Judgment!


---
Narrated Khalid bin Madan:
That 'Umair bin Al-Aswad Al-Anasi told him that he went to 'Ubada bin As-Samit while he was staying in his house at the sea-shore of Hims with (his wife) Um Haram.
'Umair said. Um Haram informed us that she heard the Prophet saying,
"Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition."
Um Haram added, I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Will I be amongst them?' He replied, 'You are amongst them.' The Prophet then said, 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.'
I asked, 'Will I be one of them, O Allah's Apostle?' He replied in the negative."
---

continue to:
---
27-Dec-2010
ADHM

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Deobandi & Tablighi Elder's "Mother Tongue"





THE RISE OF WAHHABI FITNAH
(1239 AH - 1823 CE)
INDIAN SUBCONTINENT
---

The Forefathers of Wahabi Deobandi and Tablighi Sect
FATWA OF KUFFR UPON THE DEOBANDI ELDERS
---
Deobandi & Tablighi Elder's
"Mother Tongue"
Part3

(you won't find them there^)
see over Here

Wahabi Deobandi/Tablighi Aqeedah

Here are some of their Beliefs translated into English for those that can’t read Urdu/Persian or do not have access to the original/old books

01. Allah does not know beforehand what people will do; after people do something, Allah comes to know about it.” (Tafseer Bulghatul Hairaan, page 157- 158).

02. Satan and Angel of death have more knowledge than the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam).” (Baraheen-e-Qaateah, page 51-52).

03. “The Prophet of Allah doesn’t know what will become of him in the end, and he doesn’t know what lies behind the wall.” (Baraheen-e-Qaateah, page 51).

04. The knowledge that the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) has received from Allah is the kind of knowledge that animals, lunatics and children have.” (Hifzul Eeman, page 7).

05. “During namaz (salaat) if you think of the Prophet (Salla Allahu Alaihi Wasallam), it is worse than thinking of an ox or a donkey.” (Sirat-e-Mustaqeem, page 86).

06. “The expression "Mercy for the Worlds" (Rahmatul Lil Aalameen) is not associated with the Prophet exclusively; besides the Prophet, saints (Buzurgs), too, can be called "Mercy for the Worlds" (Rahmatul Lil Aalameen).” (Fatawa Rasheediyah,Vol2-page 12 ).

07. “Only to the general public, the finality of Prophethood (Khatamun Nabiyeen) means the last Prophet, this is not the correct meaning of the term, for the knowledgeable people. Even if a Prophet comes after the Era of Muhammad, it will make no difference to the end of prophethood that is associated with Muhammad (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam).” (Tahzeerun Naas, page 3, 25).

08. “Through the contact of the scholars of Deo-Band, the Prophet (Salla Allahu Alaihi Wasallam) learnt Urdu.” (Baraheen-e-Qaateah, page 26).

09. “The Prophet is to be respected only as an elder brother.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 58).

10. “If Allah so wishes, he can create millions like Prophet (Salla Allahu Alaihi Wasallam).” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 16).

11. The Prophet died and became dust unto dust.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 59).

12. All Prophets are useless.” (maazAllah) (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 29).

13. The Prophet is not beyond all lies, and he is not innocent.” (Tasfiyatul Aqaa’id, page 25).

14. Praise the Prophet, only as a (ordinary) man.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 35).

15. The Prophet and the ordinary people are unaware and ignorant.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman,page 3).

16. As compared to the pomp of Allah, the great creation Prophet and the ordinary people are lower than the lowest.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 14).

17. The Prophet can be called Taaghoot (Satan).” (Astagfirullah)

(Tafseer Bulghatul Hairaan, page 43).

18. The Prophet among his group of believers (Ummat) has the same status as a leader (Chaudhary) and landlord has in his community and village.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman,page 61).

19. Muhammad or Ali do not have authority over anything. The Prophet and the saint (Walee) cannot do anything.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 41).

20. The Prophet was at the end of his wits” (Astagfirullah) (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 55).

21. “Apparently, an ordinary follower can be superior to the Prophet in practice.”

(Tahzeerun Naas, page 5).

22. “Deobandi Maulvi saved the Prophet from falling (into Hell).” (Astagfirullah)

(Bulghatul Hairaan, page 8).

23. There is no harm in saying "La Ilaha Illalahu Ashraf Ali Rasoolullah" and "Allahuma Salli Ala Sayidina Wa Nabeeyina Ashraf Ali". (Risalah Al Imdaad page 35, month of Safar 1336 H, Roodaad-e-Munaazirah ‘geya’, Al- Furqaan V 3 page 85).

24. To celebrate the birth of the Prophet (Meelaad-e-Nabee) is like Hindus celebrating the birthday of their deity Kanhaiya.” (Fatawa Meelaad Shareef page 8, Baraheen-e-Qaateah page 148).

25. "To be living" is the quality of the Prophet, as well as Dajjal. The characteristic of the Prophet is the same as that of Dajjal.” (Astagfirullah) (Aab-e-Hayaat, page 169).

26. Nothing happens at the wish of the Prophet.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 56).

27. “Believe in Allah, do not believe in anybody except him.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 14).

28. As compared to Allah, all Prophets and saints are non-entities.” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 54).

29. “To call the Prophet your brother is justified.” (Baraheen-e-Qaateah, page 3-6).

30. Even if a Muslim calls any Prophet or saint for help (taking them as created and considering them his defender) and he thinks he (prophet or saint) can favour him in front of Allah or if he (the Muslim) does nazar wa niaz he is equal to Kafir Abu Jahal in the sin of worshipping more than one God (shirk).” (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 7, 27).

31. For Deobandis, Durood Taaj is disliked (not permissible).” (Fazaa’il-e-Durood, page 73).

32. “A Deobandi Maulvi was given a bath by Hazrat Ali and his clothes were changed by Hazrat Fatimah.” (Siraat-e-Mustaqeem Urdu page 280).

33. Meelaad Sharif, Meiraj Sharif, Khatam Sharif, Giyarween Sharif, Urs Sharif, Some Chellum, Fateha Khwani and Essale Sawaab all are unjustified, wrong practices and the way of the Hindus.” (Fatawa Ashrafiyah, page 58, Vol- 2; Fatawa Rasheediyah page 144,150 Vol-2, page 93, 94).

34."Eating crow brings reward (sawaab)" sweet dish (Halva) of Shabe-Baraat is not justified.”

(Fatawa Rasheediyah, page 130 Vol2).

35. To call the saints (Auliya) of Allah (eve after considering them the created beings) for help is like committing the sin of worshipping more then one God (shirk). (Taqwiyatul Eeman, page 7).

To pray after the namaz-e-janazah (funeral) is not permissible.” (Fatwa Mufti Jameel Thanvi Lahore).

36. "It is justified to have sacred food (parshaad) of Hindu’s Holee and Divali" but not permissible to do so at Fatihah and Niaz. (Fatawa Rasheediyah, page 123 Vol2).

37. "If clean (paak), it is permissible to have food at the (Choohre Chamaar) low cast’s home" but food of Gyarween Sharif (Esale Sawaab for Hazrat Ghaus-e-Paak) is not permissible. (Fatawa Rasheediyah, page 130 V II).

38. To drink the water of the sabeel which has been set by a Hindu’s money of interest is permissible, but to drink the water of the sabeel of Imaam Husssain (Radiallahu Anhu) put with the "white money" of a Muslim in the month of Muharram is prohibited (Haraam).” (Fatawa Rasheediyah, Vol2-page 113, 114).

---

Urdu: Scans

---

Deobandi "Akabirs" Kufr Aqeedah

1. “Allah can tell a lie.”

(Fataawa Rasheediyah, Vol. 1, page19, 20)

Fataawa Rasheediyah by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi

It is possible for ALLAH to tell lies.” (Astagfirullah)

Almighty Allah can speak lies.” (Astagfirullah)

Almighty Allah has already spoken a lie!” (Astagfirullah)

(Fatawa Rashidia Part I Page 20, Taqdeesul Qadeer Page 79 by Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

Reference No. (1) (Rashid Ahmad Gangohi - Fatawa Rashidia, Rahimia Publishers, Delhi, (1363 H / 1944AD) Volume 1, Page 19).Gangohi is the teacher of Mohammad Ilyas, the founder of Tablighi Jama'at.

Reference No. (2) (Rashid Ahmad Gangohi - Ta'aleefat-e-Rashidia, Kitabul Aqa'ed, page 98, Idara-e-Islamiyaat, Lahore Publications, Pakistan)

Reference No. (3) (Tazkiratul Khaleel, page 135, Maktaba-e-Qasimya, Siyalkot publication, written by Khaleel Ambehetvi, compiled by Ashiq Ali).

Reference No. (4) (Mahmoodul Hasan - Al-Jehdul Muqal, page 41, matkata Urdu Bazar, Lahore,1409 H /1989 AD).

2. ALLAH doesn't know what His believers are going to do but when they commit their deeds, he knows.” (Astagfiruallah)
Ref: Tafseer Balagat-ul-Hayran (Pg157-158, Published By: Himayat-e-Islam press Lahore, Written By: Husain Ali).

3. “Knowledge of Shaitan and Malakat-ul-Maut is more than the Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him).”
Ref: Barahin-e-Qatia (Pg51, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, Written By: Khalil Anbethwi)

4. Muhammad (Peace be upon him) doesn't know about his end and what is behind the wall.”
Ref: Barahin-e-Qatia (Pg51, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, Written By: Khalil Anbethwi)

5.Knowledge of Unseen which ALLAH had given to His Prophet is similar and equal to the knowledge of Animals, Mad and Children.” (MaazAllah)
Ref: Hifz-ul-Iman (Pg07, Published By: Sheikh jaan Mohammad ala bux kutb uloom-e-mashriki kasmiri bazaar Lahore in June 1934, Printed By: Karimi printing press Lahore, Written By: Ashraf Ali Thanvi).

6. “To think about Prophet while one is in prayer is worse than being engrossed in the thoughts of donkey or an OX.” (Astagfiruallah)
Ref: Sirat-e-Mustaqeem (Farsi) (Pg86, Published By: Mujtabai Dehli in 1308 AH, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
Ref: Sirat-e-Mustaqeem (Urdu) (Pg150, Published By: Malik Siraj-ud-Din Sons Lahore in Nov 1956, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

7. “To be "Rehmatul-Lil- Aalameen" is not an exclusive attribute of our the Holy Prophet, the followers can also be "Rehmatul-Lil- Aalameen".”
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Pg12, Vol2, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1352 AH,Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

8. Considering the Holy Prophet as "Khatim-un-Nabi' yin" is by common people but it is not true in eyes of wise people.”
Ref: Tehzir-un-Naas (Pg03, Published By: Kutb Khana Qasmi Deoband, Written By: Qasim Nanotwi)

9. “Even if it were assumed that a new Prophet can come during the era of the Holy Prophet or after the Holy Prophet, it would not have an effect on the finality of our the Holy Prophet.
Ref: Tehzir-un-Naas (Pg25, Published By: Kutb Khana Qasmi Deoband, Written By: Qasim Nanotwi)

10.
 “The Holy Prophet learnt Urdu language due to relation with Ulma-e-Deoband.”
Ref: Barahin-e-Qatia (Pg26, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, Written By: Khalil Anbethwi)

(Astaghfirullah)


11. “The Holy Prophet should be respected as an elder brother..”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg58, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
12. “If ALLAH wishes than he can born 100 million Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg16-30, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

13. “The Holy Prophet has mingled with dust.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg59, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

14. “All Prophets (Nabi & Rasool) does not have authority over anything.
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg29, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
15. “It is not necessary for the Prophets to be innocent and immune (pak) from saying blatant lies.” (MaazAllah)
Ref: Tasfiat-ul-Aqaid (Pg25, Published By: Syed Maailk Kutb Khana Aizazia Deoband, Written By: Qasim Nanotwi)

16. “Respect of the Holy Prophet should equal to human (Bashar) also lower than it.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg35-61, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
17. “All creations small (such as common men) or great (Such as Prophets and saints), they all are Unknown and weak.
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg03-24, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

18. “All creations small (such as common men) or great (Such as Prophets and saints), they all are before Allah's majesty, more lowly than even a cobbler.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg14, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

19. “Respect of land lords in villages is similar and equal to the respect of the Holy Prophet in Ummah.
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg61, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

20. “Whoever is named "Muhammad" or "Ali" does not have authority over anything.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg41, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

(Astaghfirullah)


21. “The Holy Prophet was out of his senses.” (MaazAllah)
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg55, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

22. “A follower (Member of Ummah) can surpass the Prophets in deeds.”
Ref: Tehzir-un-Naas (Pg05, Published By: Kutb Khana , Qasmi Deoband, Written By: Qasim Nanotwi)

23.” I saved the Holy Prophet when he was falling from "Pul-e-Sirat".”
Ref: Tafseer Balagat-ul-Hayran (Pg08, Published By: Himayat-e-Islam press Lahore, Written By: Husain Ali)

24. “To say "La ilaha illallaho Ashraf Ali Rasool Allah" and "Allahumma sallay ala syedna wa nabiina Ashraf Ali" is right and their no objection from Islam on this act.”
Ref: Risala Al-Imdad (Pg34-35, Published By: Imadad-ul-Matabay Thana-Bhawan in Safar 1336 AH, Written By: Ashraf Ali Thanvi)
25. “Celebrating Milad-un-Nabi is similar to that of Hindu's celebration on birth of their "Kanhia".”
Ref: Barahin-e-Qatia (Pg148, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, Written By: Khalil Anbethwi)

26. “Specialities of Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him) are similar to that of "Dajjal”.
Ref: Aab-e-Hayat (Pg169, Published By: Kutb Khana Qadimi Dehli in 1355 AH,1936 AD, Written By: Qasim Nanotwi)

27. “If Prophet will a thing, it will accomplished is not true.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg56, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
28. “Only believe Allah and do not believe anyone.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg14, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
29. “Before Allah's majesty all Prophets and Saints (Aulia) are less prior than worthless particle.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg54, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

(Astaghfirullah)

30. “Holy Prophet is our elder brother and we are his younger brothers.”
Ref:
 Barahin-e-Qatia (Pg03, Published By: Muhammad Ishaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, Written By: Khalil Anbethwi)

31. “One who consider Prophets and Saints as his mediator and intercessor, is equal to Abu-jahal in polytheism (Shirk).
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg07-27, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

32. “Durood-e-Taaj is disliked and unlawful.
Ref: Fazail-e-Aamal (Tabligi Nisab) (Fazail-e-Durood Sharif Pg 52-53, Published By: Maktaba Aarfeen Karachi)

33. “A Deobandi Scholar named (Syed Ahmed Barelvi) was given bath by Hazrat-e-Ali and Hazrat Fatima covered him with clothes.”
Ref: Sirat-e-Mustaqeem(Farsi) (Pg164, Published By: Mujtabai Dehli in 1308 AH, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)
Ref: Sirat-e-Mustaqeem (Urdu) (Pg280, Published By: Malik Siraj-ud-Din Sons Lahore in Nov 1956, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

34
. “Milad Sharif, Mairaj Sharif, Urs Sharif, Soyam, Chehlum, Fatiha Khwani and Isal-e-Sawab all are unlawful, wrong and method of Kuffar and Hindus.”
Ref:
 Fatawa Rashidia (Pg144-150, Vol2, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1352 AH, Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)
Ref:
 Fatawa Rashidia (Pg93-94, Vol3, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1351 AH, Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

35
. “To eat Local Crow is good deed (sawab).”
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Pg130, Vol2, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1352 AH, Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

36.
 “To call saints of ALLAH as his creatures is polytheism.”
Ref: Taqwiat-ul-Iman (Pg07, Published By: Faiz-e-Aam Sadar Bazaar Dehli, Written By: Ismail Dehalwi)

37. “To pray after Namaz-e-Janazah is unlawful and polytheism.”
Ref: Fatwa (Mufti Jameel Ahmed Thanvi, Mufti of Jamia Ashrafia Lahore)

38. “To eat and keep gifts of "HOLI" and "Devali" are lawful and good deed (sawab)...”
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Pg123, Vol2, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1352 AH, Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

39. “To drink water from Sabil (Water containing stable tanker) constructed by Interest money of Hindu is legal (Jaa'iz) and is a good deed (sawab).
Ref: Fatawa Rashidia (Pg113-114, Vol3, Published by: Rahimia Kutb Khana Sunehri Masjid Dehli in 1351 AH,Written By: Rashid Ahmed Gangohi)

(Astaghfirullah)

40. Ismail Dehlavi writes: "Allah can tell lies." (Astagfirullah)

Reference: [Yak Roza Farsi, page 17-18]

41. Khalil Ahmad Ambethvi Deobandi writes: "Allah (SWT) can tell lies and that the question of lying (for Allah) has just not raised now but there has always been a debate on this issue by previous Ulema." [ Baraheen-e-Qati’a, page 6]

42. Mahmood Hasan Deobandi writes: "Allah has the power to do all bad things."

[Aljahdul Mikl, page 41]

43. Sanaullah Amritsari has written: "Allah Ta’ala may tell a lie, to say so is an act of faith."

[Akhbar-e-Ehl-e-Hadith Amritsari, page 2]

44. Ismail Dehelwi has written : "To believe Allah (SWT) to be free from time, place, form and being is a composite innovation (Biddah).” [Izaahul Haqq - Ismail Dehelwi.]

---

Allah (SWT) is free from time, place, form and composition. He does not live in a place, have an eye or is made up of parts. Unfortunately, Salafis, Deobandis, Ahle Hadith and like minded groups believe in this Kufr. They quote certain metaphorical Quranic verses (Ayaat-e-Mutashabihaat) to prove their wrong beliefs.

---

45. Hussain Ali Deobandi has written: "Allah (SWT) does not know in advance what human beings (His servants) will do. He comes to know about it when humans perform their actions.” (La haula wala quwwata illah billah)

Ref: (Tafseer Balaghatul Hayyraan, pages 157-158, Himayat-e-Islam Press, Lahore, written by Hussain Ali Deobandi).

46.“The glory of Allah (SWT) is that whenever He wishes, He can know the Unseen (Ghaib). Allah (SWT) has not bestowed any Wali, Prophet, Jinn or Angel with this ability.” [Taqwiyatul-lmaan by Ismail Dehlwi) (Taqwiyatul Imaan is a literal translation of Arabic book ‘Kitab At-Tawheed’ written by Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi.)

---

Allah (SWT) has the Knowledgeable of the Unseen (Aalimul-Ghaib). His knowledge is His attribute (quality) and is Sure (Waajib). Saying, "Whenever He wishes, He can know ...." means that if Allah (SWT) doesn't wish, He remains ignorant. This kind of belief is infidelity (kufr). The attributes of Allah (SWT) are not choices for Him, but are sure for Him.

It is in Quran – ‘He (Allah –SWT) has knowledgeable of the Unseen. Does not show the unseen but to His revered Apostle (SAWS). (Ash-Shuara - 7).

---

47. Ismail Dehlwi says, that even the idol worshippers in the time of the Prophet Salla Allahu 'alayhi wa Sallam did not equal there idols to Allah Azawajul. What they really did is call out to the idols in there times of need and they used to make offerings to them expecting to attain some favour. He then says that it is for this reason that anyone who considers any servant of Allah Azawajul as an intercessor or a mediator between Allah Azawajul and the servants is equal in shirk to abu jahl.” [Taweeyatul Iman, Page 8]

The above statement not only condemns the intercession of the Prophet Salla Allahu 'alayhi wa Sallam , but it also condemns all the companions Radi Allahu anhum, the great Imams Rahmatullahi 'alayh, the Awliya Allah Rahmatullahi 'alayh and all the Muslims as mushriks like abu jahl.

In th same book he says that if one is asked about how many stars etc there are in the sky then one should not say Allah Azawajul and his Rasool Salla Allahu 'alayhi wa SallamSalla Allahu 'alayhi wa Sallam know, because only Allah Azwajul has the knowledge of the unseen and not the Prophet .

The above statement condemns all Sahaba (Radi Allahu anhum) because there are thousands of Ahadith in which Prophet Mohammad (SAWS) asked Sahaba questions about so many things related to knowledge of Unseen and they replied "Allah and His Apostle knows about it" Ismail Dehlvi is saying that all Sahaba were wrong in saying so. This is Kufr.

48.Ismail Dehlwi says: “that anyone who’s name is Muhmmed or Ali has no power or right over anything.” [Taqweeyatul Iman, page22]

^By saying the above, Ismail Dehlwi is denying hundreds of Quranic verses and Ahadith.

Even a normal human being has a right and power to do so many things, then how come Prophet Mohammad (SAWS) does not have it?

49. “To accept Khaatimun Nabiyeen (the last and final Prophet) to mean that Mohammad Rasulullah (SAWS) is the final messenger and Prophet is wrong. Rather it means that he is the original and permanent Prophet and all others are temporary. Thus, if another Prophet appears after Rasulullah (SAWS), still there will be no difference in him being the final Prophet.”

 Reference - [Tahzeerun Naas, Pg. 18 and 34 by Qaasim Nanautwi,Nanotvi is the founder of Darul Uloom Deoband which was established in 1867.]

^This Institution is the largest school in Sub continent India where 100% of the scholars of these sects have been trained. In addition, they train thousands of Da'awa teachers every year in this institution to spread their misleading beliefs.

"Khaatimun-Nabiyeen" means that Prophet (S) is the Final Messenger. It is impossible for a person to become a Prophet either during the time of Prophet Mohammad (SAWS) or after it. This is the meaning upon which the entire Muslim Ummah has agreed upon and is also the meaning explained in various Ahadith. Those who reject this, are apostates (Murtadeen) (out of Islam). (Qadiyanis, Wahabis/Deobandis, Tablighi Jama’at and the like minded groups).

50. Khalil Ahmad Ambethawi says: "After looking at the condition of Satan and the Angel of Death, it can be gained that they possess a great depth of knowledge and this has been proven from the Qur’an and Ahadith. To prove such knowledge for Muhammad Rasulullah (Sallallaho Alaihi wasallam) without proof from the Qur’an and Ahadith, but from common sense, is a false thought. If, to do so is not a Shirk, then in which category of faith does it fall?" (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - (Khaleel Ambehetvi - Braaheen-e-Qate'a, page 51, Kutub Khana Raheemiya, Saharanpur, 1365 H / 1944 AD).

51. Ashraf Ali Thanawi says: "If knowledge of the Unseen refers to partial knowledge, then what speciality is there in Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihi Wasallam). Such knowledge is possessed by Zayd and Amr (meaning any Tom, Dick and Harry), every child, insane people and all types of animals."The type of knowledge of Unseen given by Allah (SWT) to Prophet Mohammad (SAWS) is also given to animals, lunatic humans and kids.” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Ashraf Ali Thanvi - Hifzul Iman, Page 7, published by Shaikh Jan Mohammad Publication, Allah Baksh, Uloom-e-Mashriqiya, Kashmir Bazar, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reference - In another publication of Hifzul Imaan printed in Mazahirul Uloom, this statement is on page 6.

Thanvi is described by these groups as Hakim-ul-Ummah. He is the teacher of Mohammad Ilyas, founder of Tablighi Jama'at.

52. Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi says: "The word ‘Rahmatul-lil-Aalameen’ is not a speciality of Rasool (Sallallaho Alaihi Wasallam). But other Prophets, saints and great Ulema are also the cause of mercy unto the worlds, even though Rasool (Sallallaho Alaihi wasallam) is the highest of them all. Therefore, to use this word ( Rahmatul lil Aalameen ) on others, is also permissible." and is not exclusive attribute of Rasool (Sallallaho Alaihi Wasallam).” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, Book - Fatawa Rasheediya, page 12, Volume 2, 1352 H, Raheemiya Kutub Khana, Sunehri Masjid, Delhi, Publication.

The title of 'Rahmatul lil Aalameen' has been given to Prophet Mohammad (S) by Allah (SWT). It is in Quran"Wama arsalnaka illa ramtul lil aalameen". Therefore, this title is exclusive with Prophet Mohammad (SAWS). As far as others are concerned, they may become a cause of mercy to a group of people or a region of people (like previous prophets came for their respective nations), but they cannot be entitled to the title that has been awarded by Allah (SWT) on Prophet Mohammad (S).Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is Rahmatul lil aalameen, meaning he is mercy on all worlds in this cosmos (which are uncountable), and not just the planet earth.

There is sickness in the hearts of Wahabi/Deobandis, Tabhlighees and like minded groups. They always try to reduce the respect and greatness of Prophet Mohammad (S) by comparing him with other human beings.

53. “ If Allah (SWT) wishes billions of people will be born equal to Prophet Mohammad (S). (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Ismail Dahalwi, Book Taqwiatul Iman, page 16 & 30, Faize Aam, Sadar Bazar Delhi Publication.

'Taqwiatul Iman' is mostly the translation of book 'Kitab At-Tauheed', written by Ibn Abdul Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabis. Therefore, Taqviatul Iman beliefs are mostly identical of Wahhabi beliefs.

As we have described above, there is sickness in the hearts of Deobandis, Tabhlighees and like minded groups. They always try to reduce the respect and greatness of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) by comparing him with other human beings.

54. “Nabi (Prophet) or Rasul (Messenger of Allah - SWT) or useless, worthless.” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Ismail Dahalwi, Book Taqviatul Iman, page 29, Faiz Aam, Sadar Bazar Delhi Publication.

Using common words to address Prophet Mohammad (S) is Haraam in Islam. The above belief is sheer disrespect, insulting and infidelity (Kufr).

55. Ismail Dehlavi has written: "The prophets and Awliya have authority (in the worldly affairs) with the blessings (and permission) of Allah – and they are our intercessors and pleaders in the Court of Allah – all such (beliefs) are Shirk and absolute nonsense."

Reference - Taqviyat-ul-Imaan, page. 13

56.Ismail Dehlavi further writes: "Despite of considering them (the prophets and Awliya) as the servants of Allah, whoever believes the prophets and Awliya as his / her helper and intercessor becomes like Abu Jahl in the matters of Shirk."

Reference - Taqviyat-ul-Imaan, page 14.

57. Ismail Dehlavi further writes: "Prophets and Satan are equal in knowing the Unseen: and about this subject (of Unseen) there is no difference between the Prophets and Awliya, Jinn, Shaitaan, ghosts and fairies."

Reference - Taqviyat-ul-Imaan, page 14

58. Maulvi Ilyas said , “that the exegeses (Tafseer) of the verse of Quran "Kuntum Khair Ummatin Ukhrijat linnasi ta'amuruna bil ma'aroofi wa tanhauna anil munkar" (Aale Imran 104) was disclosed to him in dream, saying that "You have come to your people like a Prophet". (La haula wala quwwata Illah Billah).

Reference - Mu-hammad Ilyas, founder, Tablighi Jam'at - book Malfoozat-e-Ilyas.

59. No one understood my aim. People think that this Tableeghi Jama'at is a movement for 'namaz' (Salah). I swear that this is not the movement for 'Namaz' (Salah). I want to create a new nation (Ummah). " ^Reference - Mu-hammad Ilyas, book 'Deeni Da'wa' - page 234.

60. It is 'Satisfactory and consoling' to say ' La Ilaha Illallah - Ashraf Ali Rasulullah' and 'Allahumma Salle Ala Sayyedina Wa Nabi'eena Ashraf Ali', and there is nothing wrong in saying this.”

Reference - Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Risaala Al-Imdad, page 34-35, 1136 H (month of Safar), Imdad Al-Mutabe, Thana Bhawan Publication.

^Look, this guy is claiming himself to be a prophet ??? Deobandis/Tabhlighees and like minded groups have a "Silsila-e-Ashrafiya" associated with this man. He is one among of the main scholars of these sects. All these sects regard him as Hakim-ul-Ummah and say 'Rahimahumullah' with his name !!!

61. “The distinctive feature of Prophet Mohammad (S) is the same as that of Dajjal (Anti Christ).” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Qasim Nanotvi, Aab-e-Hayat, page 169, 1936 AD (1355 H) publication, Kutub Khana Khadeemi, Delhi.

To compare any quality of the Noble Messenger (S) to disgraceful things or say that it is equal to such things is an explicit blasphemy and infidelity (kufr).

62It is permissible to call a Prophet (as) 'Satan' (Taghoot).” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Hussain Ali Deobandi, Book 'Tafseer Balagatul Hairaan, page 43, Himayat Islam Press, Lahore Publication.

63. The status of a Prophet in his Ummah (nation) is equal to the status of a Landlord in a village.” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Ismail Dahlwi, Book 'Taqviatul Iman, page 61, Faize Aam, Sadar Bazar, Delhi Publication.

64. Qasim Nanotvi says: "Prophets are superior to their followers only in knowledge, but in good deeds, followers sometimes seem equal and occasionally even become superior to them." (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Qasim Nanotvi, Book 'Tahzeerannas, page 5, published in Maktaba Fayz Nazd Jami Masjid, Deoband and also published from Kutub Khana Qasimi, Deoband publication.

65. A Deobandi Scholar saved Prophet Mohammad (S) from falling on ' Pulsiraat' (the bridge beneath which the Hell is located).” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Hussain Ali Deobandi, Book - Balagatul Hairaan, Page 8, Himayat Islam Press, Lahore Publication.

66. Obey Allah (SWT) and do not obey anyone else.”

Reference - Ismail Dahlwi, Taqviatual Imaan, page 14, Faize Aam Sandar Bazar Delhi Publication.

67. “It is Haraam to read or recite Durood-e-Taj. This Durood is disliked.” (Astaghfirullah)

Reference - Mohd Zakariya Kandehelvi, Faza'el Amaal, p;age 52 and 73, Chapter Fazaa'ele Durood, Maktaba Aarifeen, Karachi Publication.

68. To call Awliya Allah as Servants of Allah is also Shirk.”

Reference - Ismail Dahalwi, Taqviatul Iman, page 7, Faize Aam, Sadar Bazar, Delhi publication.

69. Ismail Dehlavi writes: "This should be believed that each creation whether large or small, in front of Allah’s dignity is disgraced worse than a cobbler."

Reference - Taqviatul Imaan - page 18.

(Astaghfirullah)


70. Ismail Dehlavi
 writes: "Prophets, Awliya, Imams, spiritual leaders, martyrs meaning every one of Allah’s close servants are all human beings and humble servants, and all creations are brothers, but these have been given greatness and so are our elder brothers." Reference - Taqviatul Imaan - page 44.

71. Ismail Dehlavi has reported the Holy Prophet (S) to have said: "One day I will die and my body will turn into soil (ashes)." Reference - Taqviatul Imaan - Page 45.

72. Khalil Ahmad Ambethvi writes: "One righteous person meets the Holy Prophet in his dream. He notes that the Prophet is talking in Urdu language. So he asked him, ‘How did you learn this language while you are an Arab?’ The Holy Prophet replied: ‘Since I have been involved with Madarsa Darul Uloom Deoband, I have learnt this language.’ Subhanallah, this clearly indicates the integrity of this Darul Uloom."

Reference - Baraheen-e-Qati’a

73. Ismail Dehlavi writes: In Salah the thought of the intercourse with your wife or evil temptation of adultery is better and to think about a Shaikh or a pious person even thinking about the Holy Prophet (SAWS) is much worse than thinking of your own donkey or oxen."

Reference No. (1), Ismail Dahlawi, Book Sirat-e-Mustaqeem, (persian language) page 86, Delhi 1308 H publication.

Reference No. (2) Ismail Dahelwi, Book Sirat-e-Mustaqeem, (Urdu language) page 150, November 1956 publication, Lahore.

74. Ismail Ghaznawi writes: "Whoever says Ya Rasoolallah or Ya Ali or Ya Ibne Abbas or Ya Abdul Qadir Jilani or some other wali’s name or cries for their mercy and by this call they want their help and attention which is not in anyone’s power except Allah, for example to heal a sick person, to win over an enemy or stay away from bad times etc. So in these situations to ask for anyone’s help except from Allah is Shirk (to associate with Allah) and whoever does this is a Mushrik. This is Shirk-e-Akbar and they have reached that degree. It does not matter if their belief is that it is through Allah or in fact really Allah that is helping them and this is just a way of getting to Allah, in other words all this is Shirk and to kill such a person is allowed and to rob their possessions is also allowed."

Reference - Tohfa-e-Wahhabiyyah, originally written by Suleman bin Sehman Najdi and translated in Urdu by Ismail Ghaznawi, page - 59)

It is in Hadith - Imam Ahmad mentioned this Hadith in Kitab al-zuhd, also Ibn Abi al-Dunya, Abu Nu'aym, Bayhaqi, and Ibn 'Asakir narrated it - Wahb ibn Munabbih said: I saw the Prophet (S) in my sleep, so I said: "Ya Rasulallah (S), where are the Substitutes (abdaal) of your Community?" So he gestured with his hand towards Syria. I said: "Ya Rasulallah (S), aren't there any in Iraq?" He said: "Yes, Muhammad ibn Wasi`, Hassan ibn Abi Sinan, and Malik ibn Dinar, who walk among the people similarly to Abu Dharr in his time."

The above Hadith confirms the following two things.

(1) Calling Prophet Mohammad(S) as 'Ya Rasulullah (SAWS)' is a must. It is important because the great Imams of Fiqh and Ahadith (Imam Ahmad, Ibn Abi al-Dunya, Abu Nu'aym, Bayhaqi, Ibn Asakir, etc. ) have mentioned this in their books and all their books were written after the death of Prophet Mohammad (S).

(2) Calling Prophet (S) as 'Ya Rasulullah, Ya Habeeballah, Ya Mohammad, Ya Habeebana, Ya Mustafa (S) (after his death) is also confirmed by Tirmizi, Nasa'i, Ibn Huzeema, Hakim and Baihaqi.

The following supplication (Dua) is mentioned in the books of all these Hadith scholars. The Dua also confirms that we must supplicate (make Dua') by taking the Waseelah of Prophet Mohammad (SAWS). As a matter of fact our Dua will not be accepted by Allah (SWT) if we do not send Durood on Prophet Mohammad (SAWS) before and after the Dua and seek Allah's favor by the mediation (Waseelah) of Prophet Mohammad (S).

Allahumma inni as'aluka wa atwajjahu elaika bi habeebikal Mustafa indaka ya habeebana ya mohammadi inna natawassalu bika ila rabbika fashfa'a lanaa indal maulal a'zeemi ya ni'amar rasoolut tahiru. Allahumma shaffi'ahu feena bijaahihi indaka".

(Meaning - O'Allah (SWT) I implore, I beg to you with the mediation (waseelah) of your revered beloved (Prophet -S) who is chosen by you. O' Beloved of the Al-mighty, O' Mohammad (S) we implore to Allah (SWT) with your mediation (Waseelah). Kindly mediate (shafa'a) for us with the Exalted Almighty Allah. O' Sacred Apostle (S), O' Allah (SWT), kindly accept the intercession (Shafa'a) of our Prophet (S) for us in view of the "honor and grace (bi jaahihi indaka)" he has with you.

75. Deobandi scholar Husain Ahmad Madani writes about the Wahabis and their beliefs and stating how he opposes these beliefs. He states that the Wahabis have written: "Wahabis classify a pilgrimage to Madina Munawarah (with the intention to visit the Holy Prophet’s sacred shrine as an adultery." Reference - Ash-Shahabus Saaqib, page - 46

---

76. Deobandi scholar Husain Ahmad Madani has reported that the
Saudi Wahabis have written: "A stick in our hands is more profitable to us than the Holy Prophet at least we can get rid of dogs with it, we can’t even do that with the Holy Prophet."
Reference - Ash-Shahabus Saaqib, page - 47

(1832-1890)
77. Nawab Siddique Hasan Bhopali, founding father of Ahle-Hadith writes: "Whatever that has been made in the form of a grave and which is of course against Shariat is forbidden and to demolish them down to earth’s level is Wajib for all Muslims without any concession, whether it is a Prophet’s grave or of any other person".
Reference - Urf al Jadi Farsi version, page - 60

Mu-hammad Ilyas Khandalvi
The Founding Father of
Tablighi Jamaat was Born in 1885

78. Ilyas Khandalvi, states in his own book:
"Deeni Dawat", that whilst speaking to his friend, Maulvi Zahirul Hussien (M.A. Aligarh) he stated:
"Zahirul Hassan ! We need to form a new sect."
Reference - Deeni Dawat, page - 205.
Look, the founder of the Wahabi/Deobandi Tablighi leader himself admits to forming a new Sect openly in his book!

moulana Mu-hammad Ilyas al-Kandhlawi
(d.1362H) (1943/44)

79. Mu-hammad Ilyas, the founder of Tabhligee Jama'at stated:
"Hazrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi has done a great job. I am pleased that the religious teachings are his and the method for the tabligh is mine, whereby the teachings of Ashraf Ali will spread far and wide."
Reference - Malfuzaat Mohammad Ilyas, page-57.

80. Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote about Prophet Mohammad (S) as "Worthless little than nothing".
Reference - Ashrafus Sawaneh - Page 42.
(Astaghfirullah)

81. Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote :"I keep on stating that in these times any person who does a good deed, gets the reward of 50 Abu Bakr Siddiqs (radi Allahu anhu)."
Reference - Ashrafus-Sawaneh, Part 2, page. 99

82. Wahabi and Deobandi Maulvi, Nazeer Hussain Delvi writes: "There is no proof for recitation (wazifa) of the whole Kalima, 'La Ilaha Illallaaho Muhammadur Rasoolallah,' for Wazifa purposes, there is proof for just 'La Ilaha Illallah'."
Reference - Fatwa Naziriah, page 449.
---

(Astaghfirullah)



Urdu scans: Here

Beliefs of Elders of Deoband

Kufr of Ashraf Ali Thanvi

Watch video: Here

Kufr of Khalil Ambethwi and Rashid Gangohi

video: Here

Kufr of Qasim Nanotwi

video: Here
Disgusting Deobandi belief regarding Allah ta'ala
video: Here
---------------------------------



^(Azaab on Ashraf ali Thanvis Grave)!
---
Wahabi/Deobandi and Tabligie Jamaat lanat upon your founding Forefathers!
And Lanat upon all those who are aware of the above and still show affection towards
Wahabi Deobandi/Tablighi Aqeedah!
---
We pray, Allah (SWT) save Muslims from the fitnah of these sects!


"Mother Tongue"

Original Scans of Wahhabi/Deobandi Elders (akabir)books/writings:

Scans Available: Here  Also read: Here Here

1-Fatawa Rashidiyah, Vol: 1.page, 19 (Fatawa -e- Rasheedyah by  Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi)
2-Tafsir Bulghatul Hayieraan, page, 157/158 (Bulghatul Hairan by Husain Ali Wan Bhachrani Here )
3-Barhareen e Qaatiah (Barahin-e-Qatiyah by Khalil Ahmad Ambetwi Here)
4-Barhareen e Qaatiah, (Barahin-e-Qatiyah )page, 51
5-Hifzul Imaan (Hifzul Ieemaan) page,7 (Hifzul Iman by Ashraf Ali ThanviHere)
6-Siraat e Mustaqeem, page, 86/87 (Sirate Mustaqeem by Shah Ismail Dehalvi Here)
7-Fatawa Rashidiyah, Vol: 2, page, 12
8-Tahzeerun Naas, page,3 and 25 (Tahzeer Un Nas by Muhammad Qasim Nanotvi Here)
9-Baraaheen-e- Qaatiah, page, 26
10-Taqwiyatul Ieemaan, page, 58 (Taqwiyat-ul-Iman by Shah Ismail DehalviHere)
----
1-Fatawa Rashidiyah, Vol: 1.page, 19 (Fatawa -e- Rasheedyah ) -…Can tell lie…
2-Tafsir Bulghatul Hayieraan, page, 157/158-…Does not Know?
3- Barhareen e Qaatiah-…knowledge of Iblis/Satan…
4-Barhareen e Qaatiah, page, 51-…Knowledge behind the Wall…
5-Hifzul Imaan (Hifzul Ieemaan) page,7- …knowledge of Prophet…
6-Siraat e Mustaqeem, page, 86/87-…Thinking or even thought of Prophet during prayer…
7-Fatawa Rashidiyah, Vol: 2, page, 12-…Word Rahmatul Lil Aalamin for Prophet…
8-Tahzeerun Naas, page,3 and 25-…Khaatim un Nabiyeen Last Prophet…
9-Baraaheen-e- Qaatiah, page, 26-…Prophet –Urdu…
10-Taqwiyatul Ieemaan, page, 58-…Respected as Elder brother…
11-Book Taqwitul Imaan (Taqwiyatul Ieeman)- …create million like Prophet…
12-Taqwiyatul Ieeman page,59-…Mingled with Dust…
13- Taqwiyatul Ieeman page,29-…are worthless...
14-Tasfiyatul Aqaaid, page,25- …not free & innocent from every lie..
15- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,35-…praise only as a human being do reduction…
16- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,24-…are unaware and foolish…
17- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,14-…more disgraced than a cobbler…
18- Tafsir Bulghatul Haieraan,page,43-…call taaghoot (satan)…
19- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,61-…status of Prophet…
20-Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,41-…they have no authority over anything…
21- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,55-…lost his wits…
22-Tahzeerun Naas, page, 5- A follower apparently excels in deeds…
23- Bulghatul Haieraan,page,8- …saved from falling of Pulsiraat…
24-Risalah Al Imdad,page,35-…no harm in saying so…
25-Fatawa Milad Shreef page,8 - Baraaheen-e- Qaatiah, page,148-…celebrating Mawlid is like…
26-Aabe Hayaat,page,169 (Dajjaal) …blessed with life /characterise are also shared…
27- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,56-Nothing happens on the wish…
28- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,14-(Belief…)
29- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,54-(…worthless Speck…)
30-Baraaheen-e- Qaatiah, page,3- (…your brother…)
31- Taqwiyatul Ieeman, page,7/27- (…is equal to abu Jahal in Kufr…)
32-Darud Taj -(…not permitted…) -Fatwa
33-Saiyyid Ahmad of Raae Bareilly (…Bathed put clothes on him…) Siraat e Mustaqeem
34-Fatawa Rashidiyah- (Milad and 11 Giyaarveen Shareef…are all unlawful &false innovations…)
35-Eating Crow-rewarding act-Fatwa
36-Calling upon Awliyah (friends) of Allah is infidelity-Fatwa     
37- Funeral prayers— supplicate/forbidden-Fatwa
38-Food distributed (by Hindus is permitted)-Fatwa
39-Eating Food-(…cobblers & sweepers…)-Fatwa
40-Drinking water- (…set up by Hindu/Money/Interest is permitted) -Fatwa

(Astaghfirullah)
______________________________

Scans Available: Here  Also read: Here Here

----
--


The Forefathers of Wahhabi/Deobandi & Tableeghi Sect


---