The Wahhabi Tree
The Twigs and Leaves
(Embellishment and Adornment)
"As its ugly fruit, like the heads of the devils"
Wahhabi/Salafi
Throughout
history there have been different names for this sect but in the
eighth century, one of their leaders use to call himself "Salafi".
Even
today, this sect is known by these
names: Salafi, Wahhabi, Najdi and Ahl
al-Hadith...etc
It
is generally known that today they prefer to call themselves:
Salafi
Initially, at
the time when the British were ruling in India, the followers of ibn
'Abd al-Wahhab an-Najdi were
called Wahhabis but Maulana
Mu-hammad Husayn Batalvi made
an application to the viceroy
of India that
they be called Ahl
al-Hadith rather
than Wahhabi -
this application was granted.
--
Syed
Nazeer Husain Dehlawi (1805-1902) was a leading
scholar of the reformist
Ahl-i
Hadith movement and one of its major proponents in India.
Siddiq
Hasan Khan (b.1832-d.1890)
Muhammad
Hussain Batalvi (b.1840-d.1920)
The
Punjab had been a seat of violent insurgent activities by
the Wahabis for about fifty
years from 1830 till 1880. The
government had to send twenty expeditions to subdue
the Wahabi movement.
The
term Wahabi had assumed a
rather derogatory connotation in India and in the
later parts of the Nineteenth Century Wahhabism had
been associated with militant insurgency in the Punjab and North West
Frontier of British India. It was in this context
that Batalvi requested
that they be 'un-linked' from
an unwanted impression of being Wahabis.
Batalvi wrote an
application to the then Viceroy of India Robert
Bulwer-Lytton, 1st Earl of Lytton that they
be called Ahl-e-Hadith rather
than Wahabi, which was granted
on 19 January 1887.
[ Magazine Isha'at-as-Sunnah, (محمد حسين بٹالوي، اشاعۃ السنۃ،ص:47، لاہور،ج:11,شمارہ،2)]
---
The Twigs
Pharaohs of our time
The Creation
of Evil
Salafi Sect
1-Jamal
al din al Affghani (d.1897CE)
Jamāl
al-Dīn al-Afghānī,
in full Jamāl
al-Dīn al-Afghānī al-Sayyid Muḥammad ibn Ṣafdar al-Ḥusayn,
also called Jamāl
al-Dīn al-Asadābādi,
(born 1838, Asadābād, Persia [now Iran]—died March 9, 1897,
Istanbul), Muslim politician, political agitator, and journalist
whose belief in the potency of a revived Islamic civilization in the
face of European domination significantly influenced the development
of Muslim thought in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
Very
little is known about Afghānī’s family or upbringing. Despite
the appellation Afghānī, which he adopted and by which he is best
known, some
scholars believe that he was not an
Afghan but a Persian
Shīʿite (i.e.,
a member of one of the two major divisions of Islam) born in Asadābād
near Hamadan in Persia.
An appreciable part of Afghānī’s activities took place in areas
where Sunnism (the other major division of Islam) was predominant,
and it
was probably to hide his Persian and Shīʿite origin, which
would have aroused suspicion among Sunnis, that he adopted the name
Afghānī. As
a young man, he
seems to have visited, perhaps in order to extend and perfect his
theological and philosophical education, Karbalāʾ and Al-Najaf, the
Shīʿite centres in southern Mesopotamia, as well as India and
perhaps Istanbul. The intellectual currents with which he came in
contact remain obscure, but whatever they were, they made him early
into a religious skeptic. [Source]
At
the age of seventeen or eighteen, he went to India (1855/6) to
continue his studies. During his stay in India until 1882, Afghani
became closely acquainted with the positivistic ideas of Sayyid
Ahmad Khan (1817-1898) and
wrote his famous The Truth about the Neichari Sect and an Explanation
of the Necharis (Hakikat-i Madhhab-i Naychari wa Bayan-i Hal-i
Naychariyan), first
published in 1881 in Hyderabad, in rejection of S.
A. Khan and his
followers.
The book was later translated by Muhammad
‘Abduh into
Arabic and published as The Refutation of the Materialists (al-Radd
‘ala al-dahriyyin) in Beirut, 1886. [Source]
--
Agent
Blunt, whose house he stayed at in London, sent him to Istanbul
to discuss the Egypt matter. However, al-Afghani was never able to
leave. Ottoman Sultan Abdülhamid II decided to take
advantage of him in order to strengthen the Ottoman caliphate among
the Shiite Arabs in Iraq. But he relinquished after discovering that
al-Afghani had made a deal with the British and was trying to
establish an Iraq-based Arab caliphate. He also prevented al-Afghani
from going to Arabia. He provided him a mansion and servants, and
even wanted to wed him. But the idea was rejected on the grounds that
he is "married to his cause."
Al-Afghani
never got married. He advised the sultan with respect to turning the
Ottoman country into a federation, pursuant to the British policy of
that century, but he couldn't convince him. He took offence to the
sultan. Sultan
Hamid later described him as
"a
foolish British spy."
[Source]
--
While
in Egypt he joined the Star of the East
Masonic temple, on the 7
July 1868 during his stay, his membership number was 1355, he
also later founded the Masonic Lodge of Cairo and became it’s first
Grand Master, and he joined the French Grand Orient similarly
becoming Grand Master of it, all indications of his competency with
the occult.
--
His
ideas were the precursor to other movements that would come later,
many would achieve his aims like the Young
Turks in Turkey, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi
movements in Egypt, that he and his students founded.
--
In
1884 he began publishing an Arabic newspaper in Paris
with Muhammad Abduh entitled
“The Indissoluble Link” and began a
society by that name, they wrote many harmful articles on reform in
religion
--
2-Mu-hammed
Abdu (d.1905CE)
Muhamed
Abduh:
“Man
is created from one soul,
so
it matters very little if their father is Adam or a monkey”
[Marwa
Elshakry, Reading Darwin in Arabic, 1860–1950 (Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press, 2013), 175.]
--
Mu-hammed
Abduh was the main student of Afghani, Half Turkish and
Half Arab he was born in 1849 and died in 1905, he was labeled
a Mutazili by scholars after
the heretical Mutazili sect and
like Afghani he was
also a Mason and had a close
relationship to the Bahai religion due to Afghani and
his Masonic affiliations. Under al
Afghani, Abduh combined
journalism, politics with his own fascination with Islamic Mysticism
and the Occult (Sihr).
At
the age of 28 Abduh joined the Masonic Lodge, the Kawakab al
Sharq, Planet of the East, it’s members included Prince Tawfiq, the
Khedive’s (ruler of Egypt) son and heir, leading personalities such
as Muhammad Pasha who had been a minister, Sulayman Abaza Pasha and
Saad Zaghlul. A.M. Broadbent declared that Abduh was a zealous Master
of a masonic lodge, in line with Masonic principles, and stated that
Afghani “looked forward to seeing
Muslims read the torah and bible”.
--
In
1887 he was granted the degree of Alim (teacher) and began
to teach logic, theology and ethics at al Azhar
University, both his father and mother where from the ruling
elite of Egypt. In 1887 he was appointed professor of history at
Cairo’s teachers training college, later it became part of Cairo
University, and was also appointed to teach Arabic at the Khedivial
school of languages, all key positions aimed at influencing and
molding the next generation of teachers in Egypt.
--
Abduh was
then appointed editor and chief of al Waqai
al Misriyya the official
state newspaper.
In
1870 when al Afghani was exiled Abduh was exiled to his home
village, but the following year he was granted control of the
national gazette and used this as a means to spread his sectarian
beliefs. He was then exiled from Egypt for his role in the Egyptian
national revolt in 1879.
He
spent several years in Ottoman Lebanon were he corrupted the local
Islamic education system.
In
1884 he moved to Paris were he joined al Afghani, he also
visited Britain and discussed the state of Egypt and Sudan with high
ranking British Officials. He then returned to Ottoman Lebanon were
he furthered his corrupt aims by spreading his twisted version of
Islam to those who didn’t know his background.
He
then returned to Egypt in 1888 and was appointed as a Judge
and in 1891 he became a consultative member for the court of appeal.
In
1899 he was appointed Gran Mufti of
all Egypt and held the position until he died.
This
back and forth, up and down career may seem confusing but is
actually the clearest indication of corruption and political struggle
between orthodox Islam and western forces, at the time they were
trying to dismantle traditional Islamic institutions by injecting
their own followers and educators into key positions, it was part of
their long term goal to corrupt the Egyptian peoples understanding of
Islam by making them learn it from heretical figures whose background
and history was unknown to them.
Abduh was one
of the founders of the Salafi
movement, claiming his
teachings were from the ‘Salaf’ directly,
a slogan he would throw in people’s faces to deflect from the
truth.
He
was one of the first to use the famous Salafi
formula and slogan that Islam “must
be taken from the salaf”, the earliest generations of
Muslims, but it was largely a mask hiding the rest of his
teachings.
His
methods for converting people was to loudly proclaim he was
a Salafi only teaching the
purest of pure Islam, by
omission everyone else wasn’t. Anyone that would be attracted by
it, it would take them a long time to figure out that anything was
wrong, but by that time they had already filled their minds with a
twisted version of religion and didn’t know the first place to
begin in riding themselves of it. Combine this with his practice of
the occult in indoctrinating and we can see his methods were very
effective in converting people in a short span of time.
In
his position as the “highest” Islamic Authority in the land Abduh
gave many anti-Islamic rulings like permitting Riba loans,
this “endeared” him to the British, he died in Alexandria in
1905.
--
3-Rashid
Rida (d.1935CE)
One
of Abduh’s most
important students Mu-hammed Rashid
Rida was an early radical Islamist,
his works would inspire Hassan al
Banna the founder of
the Muslim Brotherhood, as
well as his successor Syyid Qutb.
After Abduh died Rashid
Rida was Abduh’s
leading Successor who continued his work, he was born in
Ottoman Syria in 1865 and died in 1935, his
heretical ideas would influence later 20th century Islamist
extremists in developing their twisted and myopic idea of what an
Islamic state is.
He
was said to be one of his generation’s most controversial
thinkers who was deeply influenced by the early Salafi
movement founded by Afghani and Abduh.
In
1884-5 he was first exposed to al Urwa
al Wathqa, the journal of al Afghani and Abduh and in
1897 he left Syria for Cairo to collaborate with Abduh in his work,
the following Year they Launched ‘al
Manar’, a weekly and then monthly journal which Rida
worked on until his death in 1935.
Al
Mannar was one of Hasan
al Banna’s main source of inspiration before founding
the Muslim Brotherhood, Muhammad Asad the
Quran translator was a new convert to Islam at the time, he fell in
with the Muslim Brotherhood and
took much from the works of Rashid
Rida, he quotes al Manar often
in his translation of the Quran and it is his second or third most
referenced source.
Rashid
Rida was a leading exponent of Salafism,
and was especially critical of what he termed “blind
following” of traditional Islam, a
slogan designed to twist the perspective of young minds, making them
automatically defensive about subjects they had not even learnt yet.
He encouraged both the laymen and educated to interpret Islam’s
main sources, the Quran and Sunnah, for themselves inventing their
own legal rulings as they liked, under a Khalifah this was state law,
so imagine a person asking people in England to begin inventing their
own laws for government and then living by them, the result of this
in the wider society served nothing but his greater aims of anarchy
to serve the British Empire that employed him and his teachers.
He
believed in Darwin’s original theory of evolution, which
is now outdated, and to justify this Rida considered it permissible
to “interpret” Quranic
accounts in an entirely allegorical manner, like the story of
Adam. He believed the origin of the human
race was a history derived from the Jews and that Muslims are not
obliged to believe it, hence after nullifying entire passages in the
Quran he could then discard them outright paving the way for his own
teachings.
Along
with his support for the British against the Ottomans, he held a
number of delusional beliefs such as his view that microbes are
possibly a species of Jinn, he permitted riba, interest on loans, and
the construction of statues despite later salafi’s having a
fanatical stance regarding them.
Rashid
Rida deliberately engineered his attacks and blamed
Islam’s downfall, first on Sufi excesses in worship as if prayer
could lead to a person’s downfall, the blind imitation of the past
despite the fact that the Ottoman Empire he was attacking had the
most sophisticated Legal and Bureaucratic system in the world and was
not the cause for its downfall.
The
failure to achieve progress in science and technology was placed
squarely at the feet of Islam’s religious scholars despite the fact
this was not their role or profession in life, and again in spite of
the fact the Ottoman Khalifah was still amongst the most advanced
Empires on earth.
They
had to maintain one of the world’s largest empires, hence
undeveloped areas within its vast borders were compared to the most
dense cultural centres in Europe for the sake of ridicule.
Despite
these seemingly obscure views Rida was a Mason like his teachers, his
works spread around the Muslim world influencing many individuals
including the popular Salafi writer Nasir
al din al Albani who
quotes it and said it was one of the
most influential works on his life.
Rida’s ideas
were foundational to how modern sects viewed the “Modern” Islamic
state, everything he wrote was to subvertly and subtly make Muslims
conclude against Islam’s Schools of Law (Madhabs).
He understood that if Muslims believed that they came to these
conclusions by themselves, then that idea would have a longer lasting
effect in society.
The Heretics
Plans
We
should also add, because there is a lot of confusion, that the Salafi
movement and the Wahhabi
movement are two different groups, the Wahhabi’s are
the people of Saudi Arabia, their
movement began 250 years ago in that country,
the Salafi movement was
started in Egypt by these people before WWI, the
Saudi Government doesn’t control the Salafi
movement.
Further
reading:
Al-Manar
(journal)
Rashid
Rida printed a Magazine
called "Al Minar" which
was disseminated all over the Muslim world and for the first time
ever "Salafi
Manhaj" was
born. (also see: al-Albani)
Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966)
REFORMER SAYYID QUTB EXPRESSES HIS ADMIRATION OF
48 - Sayyid Qutb, one of the religion reformers of this century, too, announced his admiration for Ibn Taymiyya and Muhammad 'Abduh in almost all his books. In The Future is Islam's, for example, he praised only the word 'Islam' but he did not explain what he understood from this word or in which madhhab he was. On its ninety-fourth page, he wrote: "The spiritual leader struggling in the front row of those who protected Muslim countries against the Tatar invasions was Ibn Taymiyya."
--Note:
--
Quote:
1.
Fatwaa of Shaikh Nasir ud-Deen al-Albani
The
Muhaddith and Imaam, al-Albani – rahimahullaah – said,
commenting upon the book ‘al-Awaasim
Mimmaa Fee Kutub Sayyid Qutub Min al-Qawasim’ of Shaikh
Rabee’ bin
Haadee, "Everything with which
you have refuted Sayyid Qutb is the truth (haqq) and is correct
(sawab). And it will become sufficiently clear from this refutation
to every one who has read anything from "The Islamic Heritage"
that Sayyid Qutb had no knowledge of the Usool (fundamentals) or the
Furoo’ (subsidiary matters) of Islaam. So may Allaah reward you
with the best of reward, O brother Rabee’ for fulfilling the
obligation of explaining and uncovering his ignorance and deviation
from Islaam."
Source: From
the Shaikh’s own handwritten letter which he wrote prior to his
death in 1999. A photocopy of the original is included in the book
itself as an appendix.
2.
Fatwaa of Shaikh ‘Abdul-Azeez Ibn Baz
Some
parts of the book of Sayyid
Qutb ‘at-Tasweer al-Fannee fil-Qur’aan’ were
read to him such as his speech about Moosaa - ‘alaihis-Salaam -
upon whom he said: "Let us take Moosaa - as the example of the
leader of excitable nature - and this excitable impulse quickly
passes away and he regains his composure, as is the case with the
excitable folk." Then he said with regard to the Saying of Allah
- the Most High - "Fa as-ba-hu fil madinati kha bi fan..."
:- "This is the description of a well known state: the
restlessness or fear of one expecting evil at every turn - and this
is the characteristic of the excitable folk." [‘at-Tasweer
al-Fannee fil-Qur’aan’: p.200,201,203. 13th ....]
So
the Shaikh replied to this: "Mockery
of the Prophets is apostasy in its own."[*]
And
is was said to him that Shaikh Rabee’ al-Madhkhalee has written
a refutation of Sayyid Qutb, so the Shaikh said: "Rebuttal of
him is good."
[*] And
unfortunately the Qutubi movement clothing itself as Salafiyyah,
has not only gone to the extremes in Takfir but has also fallen into
the extremes of Irjaa’ in that it seeks to defend, nay even
promote, the books and writings of their leaders and mentors which
contain statements of disbelief and apostasy (examples will be given
in Part 2, inshaa’allaah). Shaikh
Rabee’ bin
Haadee said, commenting upon
Imaam al-Albani’s description of the Qutubiyyah as "The
Khawarij of the Era", that
"it is more befitting that they be called Murji’ah of the Era
before they are called Khawarij of the Era". Refer
to al-Asalah (Vol. 24)
Source: During
a lesson of Shaikh ‘Abdul - ‘Azeez ibn Baaz -
hafizahullaah - in his house in Riyaadh 1413H, ‘Minhaajus-Sunnah
tapes of ar-Riyaadh
3.
Fatwaa of Shaikh ‘Abdul-Azeez Ibn Baz
A
section of the book "Kutub
wa Shakhsiyaat" (p.242)
was read out to the Shaikh and in which Sayyid Qutb accuses of
Mu’awiyah and Amr Ibn al-Aas of lying (kadhib), deception (ghish),
treachery or trickery (khadee’ah), hypocrisy (nifaaq), and taking
bribes (rishwah).
So
he replied: "These are repugnant words!! These are repugnant
words. Revilement of Mu’awiyah and of Amr Ibn al-Aas. All of this is
repugnant and evil words. Mu’awiyah and Amr and whoever was with
them made ijtihaad and erred[*], and those who perform ijtihaad and
err then may Allaah pardon us and them.
[*]
Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan in checking through this made the comment,
"Being resolved that they erred is not clearly apparent, but if
it was said, "They were mujtahidoon, if they were correct they
have two rewards and if they erred they have one reward, yet their
error is forgiven", it would have been much better and more
just."
The
questioner then said, "What about his statement that there is
hypocrisy (nifaq) in them both, is that not takfir of them?"
Shaikh
Ibn Baaz replied, "This is an error and a mistake which is not
disbelief. For his revilement of some of the Companions or just one
of them is evil (munkar) and sinfulness (fisq) and he deserves to be
given exemplary punishment for it – we ask Allaah to
pardon him – however, if he reviled most of them and
declared them sinners then he would become an apostate, because they
are the Carriers of the Revelation. When he reviles them then this
means that he is reviling the legislation."
The
questioner then said, "Should not these books in which these
statements exist be forbidden?"
Shaikh
Ibn Baaz replied, "It is necessary for them to be torn to
pieces".
Then
the Shaikh said, "Is this in a newspaper?"
The
questioner said, "In a book, may Allaah be benevolent to you."
The
Shaikh asked, "Whose book?"
The
questioner said, "Sayyid Qutb…".
The
Shaikh said, "These are repugnant words".
The
questioner, continuing, "… in ‘Kutub wa
Shakhsiyaat’"
Source: The
cassette ‘Sharh Riyaad us-Saaliheen’ dated 18/7/1418H.
4.
Fatwaa of Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Uthaimeen
Question:
"What is your saying concerning a man who advises the Sunni
youth to read the books of Sayyid
Qutb, especially ‘Fee
Dhilaal il-Qur’aan’ and ‘Ma’aalim Fit-Taareeq’, without
warning about any of the errors and deviations present in these
books?"
Answer:
"My statement – may Allaah bless you – is
that whoever gives sincerity of purpose to Allaah, His Messenger, and
his brother Muslims, that he should encourage the people to read the
books of those who have preceded us from the books of tafsir and
other than tafsir. These books contain more blessings, are more
beneficial and are much better than the books of the later ones. As
for the tafsir of Sayyid Qutb – may Allaah have mercy upon
him – then it contains great calamities, however we hope
that Allaah pardons him. In it are great calamities, such as his
tafsir of Istiwaa and his tafsir of "Qul Huwallaahu Ahad",
and similarly, his description of one of the Messengers with
something unbefitting."
Source: From
the Cassette: Aqwaal ul-Ulamaa Fee Ibtaal Qawaa’id wa Maqaalaat
Adnaan Ar’oor, and checked by Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen himself on
24/4/1421H, with one slight revision who changed the phrase "Anaa
Ra’yee…" to "Anaa Qawlee…". [main : Source]
--
The Devil's Horns
-
Bin
Baaz, (1910- 1999)
Abdul
Aziz ibn Abdullah ibn Abdur-Rahaman ibn Muhammad ibn Abdullah alee
Baaz as Bin Baaz, was the Grand Mufti of Saudi
Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999.
"The
Correct Belief and the Things that are Against this Belief."
On
p. 58 of this book he states:
"Second: Whoever places intermediaries between himself and Allahu ta'ala, begs them, asks them for intercession and trusts them, becomes kafir with ijma.
"Second: Whoever places intermediaries between himself and Allahu ta'ala, begs them, asks them for intercession and trusts them, becomes kafir with ijma.
---
al-Albani
(1914-1999)
Mu-hammad
Nasiruddin al-Albani
^
“He also learnt from his father the art of clock and watch repair - and became highly skilled in that and famous for it and derived his earnings through it. He began to specialise in the field of Hadeeth and its related sciences by the age of 20 - being influenced by articles in 'al-Manaar' magazine.”
Also
do no Forget to Read
---
Next inline
al-Uthaymeen
(1925-2001)
Abu
'Abd Allah Mu-hammad ibn Saalih ibn Muhammad ibn al-Uthaymeen
at-Tamimi an-Najdi.
He
made the following statements in his Fatawa:
"No human being seeks a means through something except he believes that it possesses effectiveness towards the end he desires."
"No human being seeks a means through something except he believes that it possesses effectiveness towards the end he desires."
He
made this statement in order to enable himself to declare those who
make tawassul, apostate.
"We
must not call the Messenger of Allah Habîbullâh ("the
Beloved of Allah") but only Khalîlullâh ("the Intimate
Friend of Allah").
"We
should not ask the Prophet (s) to
ask forgiveness for us because
the deeds of a human being end the moment he dies and he
cannot even ask forgiveness for himself."
Shaykh
Mamduh called
this statement "impudent" and "a
blunder"
and
refuted it in Raf` al-Minara (p. 81-86).
Like
the rest of his sect, `Uthaymin is
an anthropomorphist who
asserts "two eyes" for
the Most High and Exalted in his
commentary on Ibn
Taymiyya's al-Wasitiyya, whereas
none of the Salaf went beyond asserting "the
eye" and "the
eyes" without
adding "two" into
the letter of the Qur'an and the
hadith, and Ibn
Hazm remarked,
"To
say that He has two eyes is null and void and part of the
belief of anthropomorphists."
--
This same highly praised evil scholar by wahhabis/salafis said:
Quote: Ibn
Uthaymeen had the audacity to called Imam an Nawawi (rah) and Ibn Hajr al Asqalani
(rah) as misguided in aqida of Asma wa Sifaat and that they deviated
from Ahlus Sunnah ..." (Naudhobillah)
Here:
click on image to enlarge ^
---------------------------------------
Abu Dhar said,
“I was with the Prophet (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) one day and I heard him saying:
It was then that I became afraid, so I said: ” Oh Rasool Allah! Which thing is that?”
---
The Leaves
"As its ugly fruit, like the heads of the devils"
---
The anthropomorphists continue
on this evil path
to destroy the correct belief in the Creator. They lie when they
claim to be Sunnis!
Ibn
Jibreen (1930-2009)
Dr. Abdullah Bin Jibreen, one of the Kingdom’s senior Ulema
Dr. Abdullah Bin Jibreen, one of the Kingdom’s senior Ulema
Hidden
for 4 Centuries
(were
the Mujaddids of Islam also hiding for 400 years?)
...In
short, if you are a follower of Ibn
Jibriin, Ibn Baaz, Ibn ˆUtħaymiin, and other
so-called “Salafis,” know
that you are a follower
of a sect that has been in hiding for most
of history since the Hijrah. They claim to
know and follow what the Salaf believed, although
they are in opposition to 95% of
all scholars of all the major Islamic sciences.
Part of this belief includes:
1. Denying
the use of rational proof to
prove that the Creator exists,
2. Questioning
the mind as a tool for knowing right from wrong,
3. Believing
that despite the mind being unreliable, a belief that has been
narrated in hiding over several centuries is known with absolute
certainty to be correctly narrated.
If
you think that is just fine, and doesn’t sound like a setup for
making you accept blindly, then
I can’t help you."
---
Wahhabi/Salafi
+Zakir-Naik-named-Dubai-Yazidi-Personality-of-the-Year.jpg)
^Dr
Zakir Naik
And
the example of a bad saying is like a filthy tree, which is cut off
above the ground, therefore not having stability.
[Ibrahim
14:26]
Admirers
supporters/sympathisers
of
The Wahhabi Tree
Deobandi
ForeFathers of Deobandi Evil
Ismail
Dehlvi (d. 1246 AH/d.1831CE) =author of Taqwiat-ul-Iman
& Sirat-e-Mustaqeem...etc
Qasim
al-Nanautwi (d. 1297 AH/1879CE) =author of TahzeerunNass &
Tasfiat-ul-Aqaid...etc
Rasheed
Ahmad Gangohi (d. 1323 AH/1905 CE) =author of Fataawa
Rasheediyah...etc
Khaleel
Ahmad Ambethvi (d.1346 AH/1927 CE) =author of
Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah...etc
Ashraf
Ali Thanvi (d. 1362 AH/1943 CE) =author
of Hifz-ul-Iman...etc
...others.
KUFR STATEMENTS BY DEOBANDIS
Note:^ Their
Original (old books) in Urdu and Persian not the
edited Urdu and English Versions/Translations that the Deobandi keep
boasting about!
---
DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS
AL
MUHANNAD says ibn
abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis and this
mufti of deobandis say that ibn abdul wahab was a good man !" to
please the Sunni Arab Scholars!
This
is called policy of appeasement !
---
THIS
IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL
MUHANNAD WAS
WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS!
Also
see : proof/scans
---
Offshoot of
the Wahhabi-Deobandis
The Tableeghi Jamaat in one breath contradicts itself.
They claim it is a Sunnah of the Prophets and Sahaba and in the same breath, that the
founder of this movement is
Mu-hammad
Ilyas al-Kandhlawi
(1885-1944)
Molwi
Ilyas
If
in reality this is a Sunnah of
the Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi Wasallam)
as claimed, then it must be proven by authentic Islamic books that
the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and the Sahaba also used to
form Jamaats and do Ghast and Tableeg of Kalima and Namaaz
amongst Muslims?
If
this is proved to be Sunnah of the Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi
Wasallam) and
Sahaba, then why was this Sunnah ignored for 1400 years and do
WE
classify all the past Spiritual Illuminaries as anti-Sunnah?
If
this claim be true that this is the Sunnah practice, then surely
Molwi
Llyas is definetly not the founder.
If
it is the Sunnah of the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) then
they are the rightful founders of Tableeg and not
Molwi Ilyas as claimed. If
Molwi Ilyas is the founder, then obviously this type of Tableeg did
not exist before him, and
if so, it can be called a Sunnah.
(It
is Bidah!)
A SHOCKING CONFESSION
Molwi
Ihtashmul Hasan,
the
most
respected
confidant, Khalifa and Brother-in-Law of
Molwi
Ilyas
(founder
of Tableeghi Sect)
From
childhood to old age the major portion of his life was spent in
leading and guiding Tableeghi Jamaat. Establishing a
relationship with the Saudi
Wahabi government was his personal achievement. In
spite of this he has stripped the Tableeghi Jamaat absolutely
naked at the junction for all to openly see.
The
name of his kitaab is "Zindagi
Ki Sirat-e-MustÃkeem."
Under
the heading ‘Zaroori Intibah’ (important
announcement) he writes:
"The
present form of Tableeg taking place from Markaz Nizamudeen
(Headquarters of Tableeghi Jamaat), in my opinion and knowledge is
neither in accordance with the Quran or Hadith. It is not in
agreement with the teachings of Hazrat Mujaddid Alf-e- Saani and
Hazrat Shah Wali-ullah Muhaddis Dehlawi and the rightly-guided Ulema.
Those
Ulema who are actively engaged in Tableeg, it is their first and
foremost duty to conform it to the teachings of Quran, Hadith and the
past leaders and Ulema. It is beyond my comprehension that a service,
which in the lifetime of Moulana Ilyas was confined to
Bidat-ê-Hasana (good innovation) in spite of the strict
implementation of Osool’s (principles), can now be regarded as the
most important service to Islam,even if done absolutely haphazardly.
Now in its degenerated state it cannot even be called a good
innovation (Bidat-ê-Hasana). I want to expose this and end my
responsibilities."
Some
comments were made in a book called:
"ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab"
(Author
– Molwi Qaamrudin Mazahiri):
"Moulana
Ihtashaamul Hasan Kandhalwi is a foundation member of this movement.
Recently, he made a severe attack on Tableeghi Jamaat and has labeled
it as a group that mislead people. It is surprising that being the
initial member and advisor up to now, his views being implemented for
so long, principles were formulated by him totally, what evil does he
now see, that has generated his opposition?"
(ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab,
pp/3, printed in Kanpur).
Molwi
Mehmood Hasan Gangohi has also commented:
"I
was under the impression that Molwi Ihtashaamul Hasan has left the
Tableeghi Markaz in Delhi due to ill health and permanently settled
in Kandhala and owing to this, is unable to participate in Tableeghi
activities. But it was not so. The actual reason of his abstention
from the Tableeghi Jamaat was that in his opinion the present Tableeg
is not a religious act and, on the contrary, corrupts the religion."
(ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab,
pp/7)
Elsewhere
he writes:
"You
regard this Tableeg contrary to Quran and Hadith and acause of
destruction of the Ummah."
He
further comments: "You
have not clarified as exactly after how many years of
Molwi
Ilyas’s death this Tableeg degenerated from good to bad innovation
and
became
a destructive factor for the Ummah. Was it so immediately?"
(Chashmae
Aaftaab, pp/e5)
The
question is not
"How
long it took to degenerate from
Bidat
Hasana to Bidat Sayyia?"
(from
good to evil Bidah).
The
real question is
"What
was the status of
Tableeghi
Jamaat in the life
time of Moulana Ilyas?
Was it a Bidah or Sunnah?"
A
passage of time does not change the status of an organisation, so why
were simple
Muslims
misled into believing Tableegh to be a Sunnat, whilst in reality it
is a Bidah?
He
goes on: "I
am surprised to see that you sat and watched an organisation to which
you had been attached for so many years deteriorate right before you
and you
could
not even issue a single statement against it." (Chashmae
Aaftaab, pp/7)
Moulana
Ihtashaamul Hasan has pointed out two important facts i.e.
1. Tableeghi
Jamaat, in its
present form is an evil Bidat, because of its Islamic Defects
and inherent fitna.
2. The
present Tableeghi Jamaat is
definitely not in accordance with Quran and Hadith or in
agreement with the schools of thought of Shah
Waliallah, Hazrat Mujaddid Alf Thani or other
past luminaries of Islam.
(The
latter is the reviver of Islam who served in India in the 10th
Century)
Other Leaves of
the Wahabi Tree
Jama'at-e-Islami, Ahle
Hadith, Jamiat
Ahle Hadith, Jama'atut
Da'wa,
Jamiat-e-Ulama-e-Hind, Millat-e-Islamia, Tanzeem-e-Islami, Jama'atul
Muslimeen, and Taliban splinter groups.
---
The
Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said:
"Seventy-two
(of the 73 sects of the Muslim nation) will be in the fire,
and only
one will be in Paradise; it is the Jama'ah
(Ahle Sunnah Wa
Jamaah)."
(Abi Dawud, Ad-Darimi, Ahmad)
---
The
Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) has prophesied that many individuals and
religious sects will cause dissension and mischief till the Day
of Judgment. He has made a particular reference to
the Wahabi Movement
---
Abu Huzaifa (Radiallahu Anhu) narrates a
Hadith concerning the leaders of the mischief
makers:
"I
swear by Allah that the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) has
not left out a single leader of Fitna from this day to
the Day of Qiyamah. Their
followers would
number 300 or more and
further gave their names and
that of their tribe."
(Abu
Dawood)
-------------------------------
Scabs of Shaitaan
Imam
Abu Ya’la narrates a Hadith from Hazrat
Anas bin Malik (Radiallahu Anhu) and the Author of ‘Ibriz’
who states:
"Hazrat
Anas Bin Malik (Radiallahu
Anhu) narrates that in Medina,
there lived a very ‘pious’
youngster.
One day we made reference about this youngster to
the Holy
Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi Wasallam). In spite of the Sahaba describing the youngster’s
features and character to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam),
the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) was
unable to recognise the youngster made mention of.
However, a few days later, whilst we were in the company of the Holy
Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam), the young man passed that way.
On seeing the young man, the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam)
exclaimed: ‘I
see the scabs of Shaitaan imprinted on his face.’
The youngster then approached the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi
Wasallam) and made salutation.
The
Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) then said to him:
‘Is
it not true that right now you are thinking that there is no one
better than yourself here.’
The youngster then replied: ‘Yes,
these thoughts did pass my mind.’
He then walked away into the Musjid.
The
Prophet then enquired as to who will kill this person.
Hazrat
Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to do so and entered the
Masjid and saw the person he was to kill engrossed in performing his
Salaat and he remembered a Hadith of the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) which prohibited one from killing a person who is
performing his Salaat and returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi
Wasallam).
The
Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) again enquired as to who will
kill the youngster, this time
Hazrat
Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to kill him and entered the Musjid
and found the youngster performing his Sajda and with the same
thoughts as Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), Hazrat Umar
(Radiallahu Anhu) returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi
Wasallam). For the third time the Prophet
(Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) again enquired who will kill the
youngster, this time?
Hazrat
Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to do so, the Prophet (Sallalaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) said: ‘You will surely kill him, if you find him.’
When
Hazrat Ali entered the Musjid, he was surprised to see that the
youngster was no longer in the Musjid and he too like the others
returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam).
The
Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said:
‘If
you had only killed him then all the Fitna in my Ummah till Day of
Qiyamah would have been wiped out and no two persons in my Ummah
would have fought between themselves.’"
[Ibreez
Shareef. pp/277, Author Allama Shah Abdul Aziz Dab bag (ra)]
---
"Umar (Allah
be pleased with him) said
to me: Do you know what can destroy Islam?"
I
said: "No." He said:
"It
is destroyed by the mistakes of
scholars, the argument of
the hypocrites about
the book (of
Allah), and the opinions of
the misguided
leaders."
(Mishkatul Masabih, 1/269, Trans. A.H. Siddiqui)
--
Ibrahim
ibn Maisara reported Allahs
Messenger (Peace be upon him)
as saying:
"He
who showed respect to an
innovator he in fact
aided in the demolishing of
Islam." (Bayhaqi - see
Mishkatul Masabih, 1/189, English Ed.)
---
--
Masjid-e- Dirar
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
Alayhi Wasallam) and his Companions finally threw them out of the mosque and
the Munafiqeen were compelled to build their own mosque nearby called:
Masjid-e- Dirar
Masjid Dirar was built near Masjid Qubâ' in
Madinah, by the hypocrites led by Abu
Amir Rahib. They invited the Prophet صلى الله
عليه وسلم to pray there, with intention to trick and mislead
him. But Allâh did not permit the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to go and pray there. As
it says in Surat At-Taubah:
And those (hypocrites) who built a mosque
to cause harm, and due to disbelief, and in order to cause divisions among the
Muslims, and to await the one who is at the outset an opponent of Allah and His
Noble Messenger; and they will surely swear that "We wished only
good"; and Allah is witness that they are indeed liars.[Taubah 9:107]
Subsequently Allah ordered the Prophet (Sallallahu
Alayhi Wasallam) to burn and raze their mosque to the ground.
---
Dajaal
KFR
Reported in the reference of Nawawi
"Gardens of Righteousness"
Abdullah, the son of Amr
The Protection of Mecca andMedina
The Protection of Mecca and
"The anti-Christ will enter each and every city except Mecca and Medina
The domes in those two cities will be guarded by angels standing in rows.
The anti-Christ will arrive at Sabakhah and Medina
Reported by Umm Sharik in the reference of Nawawi, "Gardens of Righteousness"
---
The Mischief of the anti-Christ
From the creation of Adam to the Day of Judgement there is no affair that is greater than the mischief of the anti-Christ."
"The Day of Judgement will not commence until the Muslims have fought the Unbelievers
and the Unbelievers seek refuge behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree calls out:
'O Muslim, there is a Unbeliever hiding behind me, come and kill him.'
But the thorny Gharkad tree will not call out because it is the tree of the Unbelieverss.'"
[Reported in the reference of Nawawi, "Gardens of Righteousness" and Bukhari and Muslim by Abu Hurayrah.]
-----------------------------------
The End of The Wahhabi Tree
---
Sahih Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 30, Number 105:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said,
"There will be no town which Ad-Dajjal will not enter except Mecca and Medina, and there will be no entrance (road) (of both Mecca and Medina) but the angels will be standing in rows guarding it against him, and then Medina will shake with its inhabitants thrice (i.e. three earth-quakes will take place) and Allah will expel all the nonbelievers and the hypocrites from it."
"There will be no town which Ad-Dajjal will not enter except Mecca and Medina, and there will be no entrance (road) (of both Mecca and Medina) but the angels will be standing in rows guarding it against him, and then Medina will shake with its inhabitants thrice (i.e. three earth-quakes will take place) and Allah will expel all the nonbelievers and the hypocrites from it."
-------------------------------
