Monday, January 21, 2019

Deobandi Farce



Pre -Debate (Shaykh Asrar Rashid vs Usman Iqbal Deobandi)
devbandi debates from 100 years Here

==========================================
Anwaar e Shariat on Imam Bukhari Here
==========================================
--
==========================================
deobandi claims blasphemy in malfuzat (alahazrat) Here
======================================
-
*Reply: Abu Hasan: “ if indeed, alahazrat (al-iyadhu billah) committed a blasphemy,
Why were your elders sleeping? or were they stoned?
Why did not thanawi write a refutation?
Where were all your musketeers and knights hiding all these years?
--
*Remember one thing: if they were indeed blasphemies, and you cannot produce Fatawa of your scholars FROM BACK THEN - that will rebound on your maulvis toowho kept silent.

==========================================
Deobandi Here said (Asrar Rashid: Blasphemy 1 - Prophet ISA Alayhis Salaam Failed)
==========================================
--
*Reply: Anwaar e Shariat on Nabiy Isa عليه السلامHere
Abu Hasan: “one thing is now certainmufti nizamuddin multaniis not among alahazrat's students (the tone and careless choice of words is a clear marker. one of the common benefits of being in the company of alahazrat's books and students, is that one speaks about elder ulama, saHabah, prophets and especially, sayyiduna RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam with deference and respect due to them - and being careful in the words and idoms used.”
--
========================================

Deobandi Here said (Asrar Rashid: Blasphemy 2- Disgusting Blasphemy Against Our Prophet )
============================================
--
*Reply: Mawlana Umar Ichrawi on hazir nazir Here
--

===============================================
*Jan 2019
==========================
Deobandi Here said (Asrar Rashid: Blasphemy 3- Molvi Ahmad Ridha Khan's Blasphemy Based On His Father's Principle)
======================================
--
*Reply: Usman devbandi on using 'tuu' for RasulAllah  Here
Abu Hasan: so 'tuu' is blasphemy?
according to usman devbandi, mahmud al-hasan devbandi is ablasphemer; so also shafi usmani.
please note the same verses: Here
mahmud hasan devbandi's translation. perhaps usman needs to look up who mahmud al-hasan is, do look up and call him a blasphemer. please do, please do.
of course, taqi usmani may not like it, but usman devbandi calls shafi usmani a blasphemer. enjoy zameel and co.
(note: none of the 'barelwis' ever called them blasphemers, for using the word 'tuu')
shafi usmani munafiqun: Here
--
======================================
Deobandis charge Blasphemy on mawlana abdu'l sami'y rampuri: Here
======================================
--

==========================================
Deobandi Here said: (Asrar Rashid: Blasphemy 4- Molvi Ahmad Ridha Khan's Blasphemy Against Aisha (RA)
==========================================
--
*Reply: Sayyidah Ayishah and Malfuzat e Alahazrat: Here
Abu Hasan: alahazrat said: "sayyidah ayishah raDi'Allahu `anha said something and if anyone else would say that, he would be executed". this is a hadith from musnad abi ya'ala. (Here)
sayyidah ayishah raDi'Allahu anha was upset at something and she said to RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam: "Do you not claim that you are the Messenger of Allah"? RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallamsmiled and said: "Umm Abdallah, do you doubt it?" she says, i repeated: "Do you not claim that you are the Messenger of Allah? Why don't you do justice?"
--
tell me would it be pardonable for any muslim to tell RasulAllah SallAllahu alayhi wa sallam: "you are the one who claims that he is the Messenger of Allah?" (al-iyadhu billah.)
--
alahazrat is only emphasising the greatness of sayyidah ayishahand the special status she had with RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam, and how beloved she was was to him. raDi'Allahu anha wa SallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam. but trust a deobandi to twist it into insult! la Hawla wa la quwwata illa billah.
--
Scans page,331: Here page,332: Here
--

===========================================

Deobandi Here said: (Asrar Rashid: Blasphemy 5- Molvi Ahmad Ridha Khan's Blasphemy Against The Prophet () and His Wives)
===========================================
--
Reply: Shab bāshī - spending the night Here
Abu Hasan: imam muhammad ibn abdu'l baqi al-zurqani is famous for his sharh of mawahib al-ladunniyyah of imam al-qaSTallani. he born in 1055 AH and passed away in 1122 AH. his father is the famous maliki scholar, imam abdul Baqi ibn yusuf al-zurqani, the exegete of mukhtaSar al-khalil. among the works of al-zurqani (the son) are: anwar kawakib nahj al-salik sh. muwaTTa' imam malik and sharh al-bayquniyah.
this devvie (deobandi) says that imam zurqani did not say it anywhere.but it can be found in the sharh al-mawahib, v.8 p.358 as shown below. (aqdas had already posted but here is a screenshot of the printed page).
now will he retract? and apologise? (don't hold your breath...) but there are other mistakes. the devbandi says that they believe in the lives of prophets after their passing. but thanawi said that their lives are 'barzakhiyah'. this has led to an internal disagreement with devs (deobandis), calling hayati and mamati devs (deobandis), even though all of them are soulless beings.
notice in the snippet, i have posted from zurqani, that imam subki said (and zurqani affirmed) that their lives are 'haqiqiyah', real, and not just figurative.
also note that alahazrat's statement from al-malfuz speaks in respectful tone, unlike the 'explanation' by the filthy deobandi which are from his own mind - not found in al-malfuz.
[zurqani: scan Here]
Abu Hasan: as for mr.devbandi's holier-than-thou outburst on talking about parents etc. and making a scene about alahazrat's use of a rather demure word 'shab-bashi', i advise him to please look up deo literature for their treatment of such subjects. hope he has some advice for qasim nanotvi, who examines in this topic in detail his aab e Hayaat. but of course,zameel-e-shaytan will drop from somewhere to justify the most outrageous things devs say, but vilify harmless words said by sunnis. also in cases where both parties have said the same thing (such as the tuu issue),devs vilify sunnis, all the while sitting on a high horse praising the usage of their own elders. la Hawla wa la quwwata illa billah. [download qasim's work Here [archive.org/download/Aab-e-...ab-e-Hayat By Qasim Nanotvi]
1323 edition Here  [archive.org/details/AabEHayat By Molana Qasim Nanotvi]
--
*Note: while thanawi said that the life of nabiy sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam is 'barzakhiyah', khalil flatly refused it in his muhannad. so deos can have a version for the right occasion. and of course, have a middle-ground to link both: "duniyawiyyah-barzakhiyyah" the left-right, the whitest-black. they try hard to be vague and equivocating - so they can jump over to either side as the occasion demands. Here

==========================================
Deobandi Here  said: (Molvi Ahmad Raza Khan Says The Pious Watch Husband & Wife Intimacy Live!)
==========================================
--

Reply: devbandis traducing alahazrat for ibriz quote Here
Abu Hasan: alahazrat wrote hundreds of books. and fatawa. but they are all beyond the reach of these farceurs and punchinellos. they pick up comments from his malfuz sharif which are short impromptu answers and try to twist them, quote out of context and lie.
Note: if the devbandi has guts - i dare him to read the first ten pages of sub'Han al-subbuH, if he wants to show off his scholarship. and with Allah as his witness (that is, if he believes in Allah and judgement day), let him try to read it and make a video about it.
-
Note: he himself is reading that alahazrat has quoted sijilmasi from his al-ibriz; alahazrat is only reporting it. and if he must indeed create a scene about this statement, he should excoriate sijilmasi and al-ibriz instead of alahazrat.
-
kitab al-ibriz, p.31:Here
-----------------------------------------------------------
Deobandi Scholar Mawlana Aashiq Ilahi Merathi has translated this book.Here is the scan of his translation. Translation of Deobandi Editionof Al Ibriz: Here
--
=========================================
Reply to zameel Deobandi on Alahazrat Here
=========================================
--
=========================================
Deobandis Frothing Heresy Here
=========================================
-
Abu Hasan: notice that shaykh barzanji repeats in arabic what alahazrat said in mutamad and attests his takfir, saying if they said so, they are kafir.
deos translate BACK from the arabic to urdu - which confirms that alahazrat's translation in arabic was accurate! compare it with original ibarat.
-

now tell me where did shaykh barzanji retract?
=========================================
--
*October 2019
===============================
Quote: Deobandi said: “Shāh Waliyyullāh Dehlawī: Asking Needs (Istighāthah) from the Dead is Impermissible and Kufr” : Here
============================
--
*Reply: Al-Tafhimat al-Ilahiyyah -Shah Waliullah Dahlawi : Here
--
==========================================


Brailvi ULMA ka CHISHTI RasoolULLAH peh ILMI Jawab in Urdu: Here
--


(Edited by ADHM)